Abstract
The proliferation of new technologies in the digital landscape presents significant challenges for policymakers and scholars in public policy and administration. The rapid pace of technological development and decentralization of the digital world has resulted in a “pacing problem” between existing regulatory frameworks and the changing technological landscape. This information asymmetry gap complicates public authorities and regulatory bodies to effectively govern and regulate the latest digital revolutions. One such advancement is the Metaverse, which represents the next step in the evolution of the internet from a two-dimensional interaction to a three-dimensional immersive experience. Metaverse enables opportunities for alternative public services such as health, education, and infrastructure. However, it also poses privacy, data protection, interoperability, and cybersecurity risks. This research examines the digitalization of the public sector and the current regulatory gaps in the virtual universe. Besides, the research considers the potential opportunities and threats that Metaverse technology will reveal in the administrative field within the context of “digital era governance” (DEG). Furthermore, the concept of “Metaverse governance” and its various components and research agenda are examined in depth. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the implications of the Metaverse on public policy and administration and to identify potential solutions to the challenges posed by this technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rosenberg, L.: Regulation of the Metaverse: a roadmap. In: 2022 the 6th International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulations (2022)
Egliston, B., Carter, M.: Critical questions for Facebook’s virtual reality: data, power and the Metaverse. Internet Policy Rev. 10(4) (2021). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1610
Dwivedi, Y.K., et al.: Metaverse beyond the hype: multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 66, 102542 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
Garon, J.M.: Legal implications of a ubiquitous Metaverse and a Web3 future. SSRN J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4002551
Chen, D., Zhang, R.: Exploring research trends of emerging technologies in health Metaverse: a bibliometric analysis. SSRN J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3998068
Qin, H.X., Wang, Y., Hui, P.: Identity, Crimes, and Law Enforcement in the Metaverse (2022). Online. http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.06134
Hudson, J.: Informatization and public administration: a political science perspective. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2(3), 318–339 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/136911899359619
Jreisat, J.E.: Administrative reform in developing countries: a comparative perspective. Public Admin. Dev. 8(1), 85–97 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230080108
Farazmand, A. (ed.): Administrative Reform in Developing Nations. Praeger, Westport, Conn (2002)
Uzun, M., Yıldız, M., Önder, M.: Big questions of artificial intelligence (AI) in public administration and policy. J. Polit. Sci. 31(2), 423–442 (2022). https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1121900
Janssen, M., Kuk, G.: The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 371–377 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011
Layne, K., Lee, J.: Developing fully functional E-government: a four stage model. Gov. Inf. Q. 18(2), 122–136 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Welch, E.W.: Linking citizen satisfaction with E-government and trust in government. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 15(3), 371–391 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui021
Silcock, R.: What is E-government. Parliam. Aff. 54(1), 88–101 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.88
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., Weerakkody, V.: Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 473–487 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.004
Cromer, C.: Understanding web 2.0’s influences on public e-services: a protection motivation perspective. Innovation 12(2), 192–205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.192
Hendler, J.: Web 3.0 emerging. Computer 42(1), 111–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2009.30
Barassi, V.: Activism on the Web: Everyday Struggles Against Digital Capitalism, 1st ed. Routledge (2015). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870991
Hirsch, D.D.: The glass house effect: big data, the new oil, and the power of analogy. Big Data 66 (2014)
Onder, M., Uzun, M.M.: Roles of artificial intelligence (AI) on COVID-19 pandemic crisis management policies. Int. J. Public Adm. Digit. Age 8(2), 1–13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.294122
ITU: 2.9 Billion People Still Offline. ITU (2021). Online. https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2021-11-29-FactsFigures.aspx. Accessed 23 Jan 2023
Fenwick, M., Kaal, W.A., Vermeulen, E.P.M.: Regulation tomorrow: strategies for regulating new technologies. In: Kono, T., Hiscock, M., Reich, A. (eds.) Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law, pp. 153–174. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1080-5_6
Downes, L.: The Laws of Disruption: Harnessing the New Forces That Govern Life and Business in the Digital Age. Basic Books, New York, NY (2009)
Marchant, G.E.: Addressing the pacing problem. In: Marchant, G.E., Allenby, B.R., Herkert, J.R. (eds.) The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem, pp. 199–205. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1356-7_13
Lynn, L.E., Jr.: The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: what traditional public administration really stood for. Public Adm. Rev. 61(2), 144–160 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00016
Hood, C., Rothstein, H., Baldwin, R.: The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York (2001)
Hood, C.: A public management for all seasons? Public Adm. 69(1), 3–19 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Paul, H., Jonathan, Z.: Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications. Econ. Soc. 20(1), 5–9 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149100000001
Osborne, D.: Reinventing government. Public Prod. Manag. Rev. 16(4), 349–356 (1993)
Weiss, T.G.: Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Q. 21(5), 795–814 (2000)
Kettl, D.F.: The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for the Twenty-First Century. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2012)
Saxena, K.B.C.: Towards excellence in e-governance. Int. J. Public Sec. Manag. 18(6), 498–513 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733
Bannister, F., Connolly, R.: The future ain’t what it used to be: forecasting the impact of ICT on the public sphere. Gov. Inf. Q. 37(1), 101410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101410
Dunleavy, P.: New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 16(3), 467–494 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Tinkler, J., Bastow, S.: Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government. Oxford University Press (2006)
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H.Z.: The second wave of digital era governance. Presented at the APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper (2010)
Margetts, H., Dunleavy, P.: The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371(1987), 20120382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Wang, Y., et al.: A survey on Metaverse: fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3202047
Riha, D., Maj, A.: The Real and the Virtual: Critical Issues in Cybercultures. Brill, Leiden (2020). https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848880122
Fernandez, C.B., Hui, P.: Life, the Metaverse and Everything: An Overview of Privacy, Ethics, and Governance in Metaverse (2022). Online. http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.01480. Accessed 25 Jan 2023
Clement, J.: Topic: Metaverse, Statista (2022). Online. https://www.statista.com/topics/8652/Metaverse/. Accessed 25 Jan 2023
Kraus, S., Kanbach, D.K., Krysta, P.M., Steinhoff, M.M., Tomini, N.: Facebook and the creation of the Metaverse: radical business model innovation or incremental transformation? IJEBR 28(9), 52–77 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2021-0984
Bailenson, J.: Protecting nonverbal data tracked in virtual reality. JAMA Pediatr. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1909
Ning, H., et al.: A Survey on Metaverse: The State-of-the-Art, Technologies, Applications, and Challenges (2021)
Zagalo, N., Morgado, L., Boa-Ventura, A.: Virtual Worlds and Metaverse Platforms: New Communication and Identity Paradigms. IGI Global, Hershey, PA (2012)
Bibri, S.E., Allam, Z.: The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart cities: the ethics of the hyper-connectivity, datafication, algorithmization, and platformization of urban society. Comput. Urban Sci. 2(1), 22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00050-1
Keane, J.: South Korea is betting on the Metaverse—and it could provide a blueprint for others, CNBC, 30-May-2022. Online. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/30/south-koreas-investment-in-the-Metaverse-could-provide-a-blueprint.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uzun, M.M. (2023). Metaverse Governance. In: Esen, F.S., Tinmaz, H., Singh, M. (eds) Metaverse. Studies in Big Data, vol 133. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4641-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4641-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4640-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4641-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)