Skip to main content

Metaverse and Human Rights: Do We Need Metaversal Declaration of Human Rights?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metaverse

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 133))

  • 730 Accesses

Abstract

Human rights, which is the legacy of the Enlightenment and one of the best ideas that humanity has come up with, are defined as the rights that all humans have just by virtue of being human, and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), human rights appear as principles concerning special treatment to the members of certain (human) species. However, although the common definition is in this direction, there is no consensus on the concept of human rights in the doctrine. This confusion on the conceptualization of human rights makes it difficult to evaluate new problems that arise, and as a matter of course, we face human rights violations or rights inflation. It is possible to observe such situations, in terms of developing technologies and economic transformations. The requirements related to human rights, which are set forth in the UDHR with a certain understanding and subsequently intended to be protected by international law instruments, generally take into account the existing situations and technologies at the time of establishment of the relevant instruments. Therefore, the impacts of rapid advancements of new technologies on human rights are tried to be handled through interpretation of existing documents and/or through formation of additional protocols or new principles. On the other hand, since the international instruments impose obligations on the state parties, which bind themselves with these documents, the existing documents are not sufficient to protect human rights within the framework of the economic and technological transformation experienced and the role of the business in this context. Therefore, both different approaches of the concept of human rights, as well as the social, technological and economic transformations that have been experienced, create new problems that need to be solved in the relationship with human rights. In this context, although there is not an obvious definition of Metaverse, the impacts of Metaverse on human rights, which occupies the World agenda nowadays, seem to be frequently questioned in the coming days. Therefore, in this article, Kuçuradi's perspective on human rights as a foundation to address potential risks associated with the Metaverse concept will be explored, and subsequently potential solutions to arising human rights concerns will be proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While the fact that international human rights instruments only address states is one problem, the inadequacy of the instruments in the face of developing technologies, the records of states regarding their sovereign rights, and the contradictions within the instruments themselves can be counted among the reasons for the inadequate functioning of such human rights instruments and mechanisms. Kuçuradi also cites the contradictions in the existing main human rights documents among the reasons for the human rights problems and emphasizes that these documents should be revised in the light of clearer concepts and experiences to date [1].

  2. 2.

    In 2011, after the adoption of the Guiding Principles, Ecuador and South Africa took the issue of negotiations for a binding treaty to the United Nations, and after the adoption of this proposal by the United Nations Human Rights Council, an open-ended intergovernmental working group was established and negotiations on a treaty began. These negotiations have been ongoing since 2015 (Wettstein 2020, p. 31).

References

  1. Kuçuradi, İ.: İnsan Hakları Kavramları ve Sorunları. Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, Ankara (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dembour, M.-B.: What are human rights? four schools of thought. Hum Rights Quart 32, 1–20 30–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198061762.003.0002 (2010)

  3. Baxi, U.: Epilogue: Changing the paradigms of human rights, law against the state. In: Eckert et al. (ed.), pp. 266–285. Cambrigre University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Micheline, I.: What are human rights? six historical controversies. J. Hum. Rights 3(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475483042000224897 (2004)

  5. Donnelly, J.: Teoride ve Uygulamada Evrensel İnsan Hakları (M. Erdoğan, & L. Korkut, Çev.) Yetkin, Ankara (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uygun, O.: İnsan Hakları Kuramı. İnsan Hakları, Cogito 98, s. 13–44 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tepe, H.: İnsan Hakları Felsefesi. Bilgesu Yayıncılık, Ankara (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuçuradi, İ.: Felsefe ve İnsan Hakları. İ.K. (ed.) içinde, İnsan Haklarının Felsefi Temel- leri (3.Baskı) (s. 73–81). Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, Ankara (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mengüşoğlu, T.: İnsan Felsefesi (Gözden Geçirilmiş Yeni Baskı). Doğu Batı, İstanbul (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mengüşoğlu, T.: Felsefeye Giriş (Gözden Geçirilmiş Yeni Baskı). Doğu Batı, İstanbul (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuçuradi, İ.İ.H.: Kavramı ve Çeşitleri. İnsan Hakları Konferans Panel ve Sempozyumlar. (2. Baskı), s. 81–114. Ankara Barosu, Ankara (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hızel Çobansoy, G.: İnsan Hakları Açısından Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Sorunu. Unpublished Masters Thesis, İstanbul (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baxi, U.: From human rights to the right to be human: some heresies. Ind. Int. Centre Quart. 13(3/4), 185–200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23001445 (1986)

  14. Charamba, K.: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect in the Dawn of a Metaverse. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2022/14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4043254 (2022)

  15. Spence, E.: Meta Ethics for the Metaverse: The Ethics of Virtual Worlds, pp. 3–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234824743_Meta_Ethics_for_the_Metaverse_The_Ethics_of_VirtualWorlds (2008)

  16. Tepe, H.: Pratik Etik. Bilgesu Yayıncılık, Ankara (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dionisio John, D.N.: The Metaverse could actually help people. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/27/1036817/Metaverse-facebook-virtual-reality-augmented/ (2021)

  18. Jain, A.: Human rights in the Metaverse. https://mkai.org/human-rights-in-the-Metaverse/ (2022)

  19. Basu, T.: The Metaverse has a groping problem already. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/12/16/1042516/the-Metaverse-has-a-groping-problem/ (2021)

  20. Lau, P.L.: The Metaverse: three legal issues we need to address. https://theconversation.com/the-Metaverse-three-legal-issues-we-need-to-address-175891 (2022)

  21. Lavoie, R., Main, K., King, C.Vd: Virtual experience, real consequences: the potential negative emotional consequences of virtual reality gameplay. Virtual Real 25, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00440-y (2021)

  22. Ruggie, J.G: Just Business, Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. WW Norton Company, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wettstein, F.: The History of ‘Business and Human Rights’ and its Relationship with ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anita, R.: Closing the governance gap in the business and human rights arena: lessons from the anti-corruption movement, in human rights obligations of business. In: Deva, S., Bilchitz, D. (eds.), pp. 162–90. Cambridge University Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raso, F., Hilligoss, H., Krishnamurthy, V., Bavitz, C., Levin, K.: Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Locke, R.M.: Global rules, private actors: future challenges for business and human rights. In: Bauman Pauly, D., Nolan, J. (eds), Business and Human Rights: From Principles to Practice. Routledge, Londra (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Langlois, A.: Normative and Theoretical Foundations of Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198708766.003.0002 (2013)

  28. Shue, H.:Temel Hakların Evrenselliği. İoanna Kuçuradi (ed.) içinde, İnsan Haklarının Felsefi Temelleri (3. Baskı) (s. 39–66). Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. UNHRHC.: Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf (2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gokce Cobansoy Hizel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cobansoy Hizel, G. (2023). Metaverse and Human Rights: Do We Need Metaversal Declaration of Human Rights?. In: Esen, F.S., Tinmaz, H., Singh, M. (eds) Metaverse. Studies in Big Data, vol 133. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4641-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics