Skip to main content

Performance of Geocell Reinforced Expansive Soil Bed Under Circular Footing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Earth and Beyond (EGRWSE 2022)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of laboratory model experiments on a circular foundation to better understand the performance of geocell reinforced expansive soil. The subsoil in this study was formed by naturally occurring expansive soil. To strengthen the soil bed, chevron-patterned geocells formed of polypropylene geotextile were used. Geocell mattress’s height, geocell mattress’s pocket size, and the geocell mattress’s placement depth were all investigated in this testing program depth. In contrast to previous researchers, the reinforced bed’s improved performance is determined to a settlement corresponding to the soil bed’s failure settlement without reinforcement. The factors, non-dimensional, such as; If “bearing capacity improvement factor” and PRS% “settlement reduction factor”, are used to evaluate the performance of reinforced beds. The use of geocell as a reinforcement caused a substantial bearing capacity increase as well as the decrease of footing settlement, as indicated by the test findings. The use of a geocell mattress of ideal proportions placed directly below the footing base increased the reinforced bed’s bearing capacity greater than 200% and reduced footing settlement greater than 81%. The present study highlights the use of geocells toward the stabilization of the expansive soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hausmann MR (1990) Engineering principles of ground modification. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prabakar J, Sridhar RS (2002) Effect of random inclusion of sisal fibre on strength behaviour of soil. Constr Build Mater 16(2):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yarbaşı N, Kalkan E, Akbulut S (2007) modification of the geotechnical properties, as influenced by Freeze–Thaw, of granular soils with waste additives. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin L, Wang G, Kamai T, Zhang F, Yang J, Shi B (2011) Static liquefaction behavior of saturated fiber-reinforced sand in undrained ring-shear tests. Geotext Geomembr 29(5):462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Santoni RL, Webster SL (2001) Airfields and roads construction using fiber stabilization of sands. J Transp Eng 127(2):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma R, Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Yoon S (2009) Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 101(12):124–1255

    Google Scholar 

  8. El Sawwaf MA (2007) Behavior of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand over a soft clay slope. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fragaszy RJ, Lawton E (1984) Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades. J Geotech Eng 110(10):1500–1507

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guido VA, Dong K, Chang DK, Sweeney MA (1986) Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Can Geotech J 23(4):435–440

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hatami K, Bathurst RJ, Pietro PD (2001) Static response of reinforced soil retaining walls with nonuniform reinforcement. Int J Geomech 14:477–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Cook EE, Yen SC (1993) The bearing-capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 12(4):351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Léonard D, Vanelstraete A, Parewyck S (2002) Structural design of flexible pavements using steel netting as base reinforcement. Int J Geomech 2(3):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou H, Wen X (2008) Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh A, Ghosh A, Bera AK (2005) Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jute-geotextile. Geotext Geomembr 23(2):144–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Latha GM, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2006) Experimental and theoretical investigations on geocell-supported embankments. Int J Geomech 6(17):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  17. Latha GM, Murthy VS (2007) Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2007) Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds. Geotech Geol Eng 25(5):509–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pokharel SK, Han J, Parsons RL, Qian Y, Leshchinsky D, Halahmi I (2009) Experimental study on bearing capacity of geocell reinforced bases. In: Tuumluer, Al-Qadi (eds) Bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields. Taylor & Francis, pp 1159–1166

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dash SK (2010) Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. J Mater Civ Eng 22(5):533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tafreshi SNM, Dawson AR (2010) Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dash SK (2012) Effect of geocell type on load-carrying mechanisms of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Int J Geomech 12(5):537–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biswas A, Murali Krishna A, Dash SK (2013) influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems. Geosynth Int 209(6):376–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bazne MOA, Vahedifard F, Shahrokhabadi S (2014) the effect of geonet reinforcement on bearing capacity of low-compacted soft clay. Infrastructure Geotechnology 2(1):47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) Experimental and analytical studies on soft clay beds reinforced with bamboo cells and geocells. Int J Geosynthetics Ground Eng 1(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Indraratna B, Biabani MM, Nimbalkar S (2015) Behavior of geocell-reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading in plane-strain condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(1):04014081

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shadmand A, Ghazavi M, Ganjian M (2018) scale effects of footings on geocell reinforced sand using large-scale tests. Civil Eng J 4(3):497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehrjardi GT, Motarjemi F (2018) Interfacial properties of geocell-reinforced granular soils. Geotext Geomembr 46(4):384–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaur A, Gill KS, Singh P (2018) Bearing capacity improvement using geocell reinforced sand. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on sustainable waste management through design, pp 160–169

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kolathayar S, Suja P, Nair V, Krishna S, Tamilarasi G (2019) Performance evaluation of seashell and sand as infill materials in HDPE and coir geocell. Innov Infrastruct Solutions 4(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y, Deng A, Jaksa’ M (2019) Failure mechanisms of geocell walls and junctions. Geotext Geomembranes 47(2):104–120

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kuo CM, Chou FJ (2004) Development of 3-D finite element model for flexible pavements. J Chin Inst Eng 27(5):707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kolathayar S, Sowmya S, Priyanka E (2020) Comparative study for performance of soil bed reinforced with jute and sisal geocells as alternatives to HDPE Geocells. Int J Geosynthetics Ground Eng 6(4):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lal D, Prasanna KL, Rao KR, Kamalekkar P, Bajrang J (2020) Effect of geocell on the behaviour of soil. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 998, no 1. IOP Publishing, p 012024

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kolathayar, S. and Chitrachedu, R.K., “Model Footing Tests on Sand Bed to Evaluate Efficiency of Tire Crumb as Infill Materials in Geocells” In Advances in Geo-Science and Geo-Structures, Springer, Singapore 253–259 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gedela R, Karpurapu R (2021) Influence of pocket shape on numerical response of geocell reinforced foundation systems. Geosynth Int 28(3):327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. .Arvin MR, Heidari Sooreshjani M, Khademhosseini A (2021) Behaviour of geocell-reinforced strip footings on slopes. Geomech Geoeng 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  38. Biswas S, Hussain M, Singh KL (2021) Behaviour of jute and bamboo geocell with additional basal mat filled with different infill materials overlaying soft subgrade. Int J Geosynthetics Ground Eng 7(3):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar S, Sahu AK, Naval S (2020) Influence of jute fibre on CBR value of expensive soil. Civil Eng J 6(6):1180–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar S, Sahu AK, Naval S (2021) Study on the swelling behavior of clayey soil blended with geocell and jute fibre. Civil Eng J 7(8):1327–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dash SK (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19(4):235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2001) Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 19(8):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Latha MG, Somwanshi A (2009) Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footings on sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K, Latha MG (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation. Geotech Test J 23(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hegde AM, Sitharam TG (2014) Effect of infill materials on the performance of geocell reinforced soft clay beds. Geomech Geoeng 10(3):163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sitharam TG, Sireesh S (2006) Effects of base geogrid on geocell-reinforced foundation beds. Geomech Geoeng 1(3):207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research article is based on research work carried out at the Civil Engineering Department of Vaish Technical Institute, Rohtak (Haryana), India. Furthermore, we are gratefully acknowledged the friendly forbearance and the unstinted help provided by Dr. R. S. Keserwani in helping with the test setup.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, S., Naval, S., Sahu, A.K. (2023). Performance of Geocell Reinforced Expansive Soil Bed Under Circular Footing. In: Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K. (eds) Sustainable Earth and Beyond. EGRWSE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 370. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4041-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4041-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4040-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4041-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics