Skip to main content

Discussion on the Reuse of Suboptimal Food Through the Perspective of Sustainable Food Circle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EcoDesign for Sustainable Products, Services and Social Systems II
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

The primary source of food waste is all due to the ingredients’ defects, which consumers do not favor. There are three categories: poor visual appearance, damaged packaging, and expiration date food, which lead to unnecessary food waste. This research hopes to discuss the solution of suboptimal food reuse through the perspective of sustainable development and the problem of food waste. The method mainly adopts literature analysis, the KJ (Kawakita Jiro) method, and interviews. Through the department of design, students converged the reuse solution through the KJ method. Five concept samples with poor visual appearance, as well as four concept samples each for damaged packaging and expiration date food were extracted. After the evaluation of concept samples by scholars, some solutions were put forward, including the best solution for poor visual appearance is “reuse of pet vegetable biscuits,” the best solution for reuse of damaged packaging is “planning of reduced packaging promotion activities,” and the best solution for expiration date food reuse is the “planning and design of store commodity management platform.” In addition, after cross-comparison with the best solutions of the three categories through the critical summary of the interviews, they all correspond to each other. In terms of the overall design strategy for reusing suboptimal food, three main application strategies were summarized: (1) the application of the concept of sustainable circulation, (2) the consumer’s point of view as the center, and (3) thinking about the utilization of food materials. The results of this study can be used as a reference for designers to make relevant designs and also as a reference for industries and governments in formulating strategies for sustainable development goals in food projects. At the same time, it hopes to provide scholars engaged in sustainable design research with a foundation for subsequent studies to promote a sustainable food circle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aschemann-Witzel J, De Hooge I, Amani P, Bech-Larsen T, Oostindjer M (2015) Consumer-related food waste: causes and potential for action. Sustainability 7(6):6457–6477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beretta C, Stoessel F, Baier U, Hellweg S (2013) Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland. Waste Manag 33(3):764–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bor AM, Blom G (1994) Introduction to environmental product development. Europe Design Center Ltd., Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) What is sustainable development. Our Common Future 8(9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn D, Feenstra GW, Lynch L, Sommer R (1990) Consumer acceptance of cosmetically imperfect produce. J Consum Affairs 24(2):268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burall P (1994) Green-ness is good for you. Design-London 544:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzby JC, Farah-Wells H, Hyman J (2014) The estimated amount, value, and calories of postharvest food losses at the retail and consumer levels in the United States. USDA-ERS Econ Inform Bull 121

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps O, Ishdorj A, Murano PS, Field L, Hutto A, Storey M (2019) Waste not want not. Choices 34(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceschin F, Gaziulusoy I (2016) Evolution of design for sustainability: from product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Des Stud 47:118–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SK, Bai JF, Jin ZH, Wang DY, Liu G, Gao S, Bao JL, Li XT, Li R, Jiang NQ, Yan WJ, Zhang SG (2017) Reducing food loss and food waste: some personal reflections. J Nat Resour 32(4):529–538

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hooge IE, Oostindjer M, Aschemann-Witzel J, Normann A, Loose SM, Almli VL (2017) This apple is too ugly for me!: Consumer preferences for suboptimal food products in the supermarket and at home. Food Qual Prefer 56:80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Laurentiis V, Corrado S, Sala S (2018) Quantifying household waste of fresh fruit and vegetables in the EU. Waste Manag 77:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveline J (2013) Amsterdam Circular Strategy, City of Amsterdam. https://www.amsterdam.nl/wonen-leefomgeving/duurzaam-amsterdam/

  • F.A.O. (2013) Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/i3347e/i3347e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • F.A.O. (2014) Food loss and food waste. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/food-loss-and-food-waste/flw-data

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaziulusoy I, Erdoğan Öztekin E (2019) Design for sustainability transitions: origins, attitudes and future directions. Sustainability 11(13):3601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, Van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A (2011) Global food losses and food waste. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloran A, Clement J, Kornum N, Bucatariu C, Magid J (2014) Addressing food waste reduction in Denmark. Food Policy 49:294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmert JR, Symmank C, Pannasch S, Rohm H (2017) Have an eye on the buckled cucumber: an eye tracking study on visually suboptimal foods. Food Qual Prefer 60:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang DS (1995) Principles and techniques of Taiwanese KJ method. China Productivity Center, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire A, Limbourg S (2019) How can food loss and waste management achieve sustainable development goals? J Clean Prod 234:1221–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E (2009) New design knowledge. Des Stud 30(1):4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. North Point Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth MK, Birney C, Cuéllar A, Finn SM, Freeman M, Galloway JN, Meyer E (2019) A systems approach to assessing environmental and economic effects of food loss and waste interventions in the United States. Sci Total Environ 685:1240–1254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papanek V, Fuller RB (1971) Design for the real world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S (2010) Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 365(1554):3065–3081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendeville S, Cherim E, Bocken N (2018) Circular cities: mapping six cities in transition. Environ Innov Soc Trans 26:171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1968) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spool JM (2004) The KJ-technique: a group process for establishing priorities. Center Centre Inc., North Andover

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckli S, Niklaus E, Dorn M (2018) Call for testing interventions to prevent consumer food waste. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:445–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theotokis A, Pramatari K, Tsiros M (2012) Effects of expiration date-based pricing on brand image perceptions. J Retail 88(1):72–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White K, Lin L, Dahl DW, Ritchie RJ (2016) When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. J Mark Res 53(1):110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2020) The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets (Vol. 2020). Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/ca9692zh/CA9692ZH.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tu, JC., Chu, KH. (2024). Discussion on the Reuse of Suboptimal Food Through the Perspective of Sustainable Food Circle. In: Fukushige, S., Kobayashi, H., Yamasue, E., Hara, K. (eds) EcoDesign for Sustainable Products, Services and Social Systems II. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3897-1_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics