Abstract
“Life without an aim is like a ship without a sail”. This is very true with the present generation. They are very focused and at a very young age, they set their career goals. While in school, they know about their strengths, abilities, and start working on them. From the secondary level, they start thinking about the particular area of studies they will opt for in their future, whether they will opt for science, commerce, humanities, or opt for a job-oriented course. The parents also play an important role and help their wards with the selection of their streams so that they have a secure future. This is possible when the right decision is taken at the right time. Thus, it is very important to choose the right course and complete giving your best, and fulfill one dream of reaching the top. The right decision taken helps to allow the student to discover both their interests and skills. So, an effort has been made to develop a mathematical model (math model) with these features, which is made up of multiple decision trees. This study is based on the RFs Algorithm (RFA), an innovative assemble classifier that figures a large number of decision trees to improve the decision over the single tree classifier. With the help of the RFA, a classification model was proposed and the outcome of the model is depending on the voting system in which several classifiers are running autonomously.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dey S, Ghosh DN (2016) An integrated approach of multi-criteria group decision making techniques to evaluate the overall performance of teachers. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 7(5):38–45
Dey S, Ghosh DN (2015) Non-teaching staff performance analysis using multi-criteria group decision making approach. Int J Educ Learn 4(2):35–50
Mondal SD, Ghosh DN, Dey PK (2021) Prediction of NAAC grades for affiliated institute with the help of statistical multi criteria decision analysis. Int J Eng Appl Phys 1(2):116–126
Dey S, Ghosh DN (2019) Comparative evaluation of students’ performance in campus recruitment of a technical institution through Fuzzy-MCDM techniques. Int J Comput Sci Eng 7(1):232–236
Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140
Ho TK (1998) The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(8):832–844
Breiman L (2001) RFs. Mach Learn 45:5–32
Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall, New York
Dietterich TG (2000) An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, and randomization. Mach Learn 40:139–157
Kwok SW, Carter C (1988) Multiple decision trees. Uncertainty Artif Intell, pp 213–220
Criminisi A, Shotton J, Konukoglu E (2011) Decision forests: a unified framework for classification, regression, density estimation, manifold learning, and semi-supervised learning. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis 7(2–3):81–227
Criminisi A, Shotton J (2013) Decision forests for computer vision and medical image analysis. Springer Science & Business Media
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mondal, S.D., Ghosh, D.N., Dey, P.K. (2023). Prediction of Future Career Course of Students Through RF Algorithm. In: Chakraborty, B., Biswas, A., Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Advances in Data Science and Computing Technologies. ADSC 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1056. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3656-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3656-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3655-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3656-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)