Skip to main content

Co-Benefits of Adopting Green Concept for the Sustainable Building Construction in Sri Lanka

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICSBE 2022 (ICSBE 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 362))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 431 Accesses

Abstract

As the world moves closer to achieving sustainable development, the idea of green building has emerged as one of the most important trends in the construction sector around the world. Buildings that are environmentally friendly use less energy and less water, which saves money while preserving natural resources. As a result of growing interest in the topic on a global scale, the development of environmentally friendly buildings has recently appeared as an emerging trend in Sri Lanka. According to the findings of several studies, the initial expenditure required for the construction of environmentally friendly buildings is considerably more than that of conventional buildings. When adopting a green idea for the construction of buildings, a developing nation like Sri Lanka needs to understand the genuine advantages as well as the difficulties that may arise. Therefore, the purpose of the research was to investigate the co-benefits connected with green buildings for a country like Sri Lanka and then to examine each co-benefit in terms of the amount of time that it may expect to be realized. The primary method for collecting data was a questionnaire survey. The statistical approach of the relative importance index was utilized to analyze the collected information. According to the findings, the development of an environmentally friendly building offers various environmental, economic, and social co-benefits to the owners as well as the users of those built environments. Further, the article discusses the relative levels of the significance of each building element within the context of sustainability, green building barriers, and green building approaches in Sri Lanka. Furthermore, most co-benefits are only attainable in the long run, which takes generally more than two years following the construction of a green building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abidin N (2010) Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept. Habitat International

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arif M, Egbu C, Haleem A, Kulonda D, Khalfan M (2009) State of green construction in india: drivers and challenges. J Eng Des Technol

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashuri PD (2010) An overview of the benefits and risk factors of going green in existing buildings. Int J Facility Manag 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azizi NZ, Abidin NZ, Raofuddin A (2015) Identification of soft cost elements in green projects exploring experts’ experience. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan EH, Qian QK, Lam PT (2009) The market for green building in developed Asian cities—the perspectives of building designers. Energy Policy 37(8):3061–3070

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cole (2005) Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles. Build Res Inf 455–467; Cole 2, Pahwa N (n.d.) [Online]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cole R (2000) Cost and value in building green. Build Res Inf 304–309

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cole R (2005) Building environmental assessment methods. Redefining intentions and roles. Build Res Inf 35(5):455–467

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooperation CFE (n.d.) Green building in North America: opportunities and challenges. [Online] Available at: : http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/2335-green-building-in-north-america-opportunities-and-challenges-en.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2022

  10. Council GB (n.d.) System, LEED green building rating. In: LEED green building rating. Washington DC USA, s.l.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Forum WE (2022) World Economic Forum. [Online] Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/07/economic-politics-debt-protest-crisis-sri-lanka/. Accessed 02 May 2022

  12. Heerwagen (2000) Green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity. s.l.:s.n.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hewage T, Mallika KI (2011) Current Trends in forest and environmental policies in Sri Lanka. In: International forestry and environment symposium, Colombo, Issue. University of Sri Jayewardenepura

    Google Scholar 

  14. IWb (2017) Green buildings market intelligence Sri Lanka country profile. World bank group, s.l.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jayalath M (2010). Build green to ensure sustainability. [Online] Available at: http://www.slema.org.lk/news_events/03082010/Presentation-on-Green-Buildings.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2022

  16. Jayalath MS (2010) Build green to ensure sustainability. . In Proceeding of the Sri Lanka energy managers association annual sessions, Issue 2010, Colombo 30 July 2010. Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kats G (2003) The costs and financial benefits of green buildings - a report to California’s sustainable building task force. [Online] Available at: https://www.usgbc.org/Docs/News/News477.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2022

  18. Kats G (2003) Green building costs and financial benefits. The USA. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kats G (n.d.) Green building costs and financial benefits. Massachusetts Technology collaborative USA, Issue 2003

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keats G (2003) The costs and financial benefits of green buildings - a report to California’s sustainable building task force [online]

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lanka GBCS (2010) Green rating system for the built environment. Sri Lanka. [Online] Available at: https://srilankagbc.org/. Accessed 09 May 2022

  22. Lavy S (2011) LEED accredited professionals‘ perceptions affecting credit point adoption. Facilities, s.l.: s.n

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lavy S, Ferna´ndez-Solis JL (2009) LEED accredited professionals‘ perceptions affecting credit point adoption, Facilities, 27(13–14)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morris P (2007) What does green cost? [Online] Available at: https://aecom.com/. Accessed 10 May 2022

  25. Nsairat A (2009) Developing a green building assessment tool for developing. s.l.:s.n

    Google Scholar 

  26. PahwaT (n.d.) Essay on green architecture. [Online] Available at: https://www.scribd.com/doc/14198163/Essay-on-Green-Architecture. Accessed 09 May 2022

  27. Richardson (n.d.) Institutional motivations and barriers to the construction of green buildings on campus. s.l.:s.n

    Google Scholar 

  28. Woolley T, Kimmins S, Harrison R, Harrison P (1997) Green building handbook. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. D. D. Mudannayaka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mudannayaka, M.A.D.D., Wijesundara, J. (2023). Co-Benefits of Adopting Green Concept for the Sustainable Building Construction in Sri Lanka. In: Dissanayake, R., et al. ICSBE 2022. ICSBE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 362. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3471-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3471-3_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3470-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3471-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics