Skip to main content

Assessing Synthetic Voices for Mental Health Chatbots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Eighth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (ICICT 2023)

Abstract

Considering the possibility to exploit information and communication technologies (ICT) and specifically speaking chatbots, in the mental health domain, a study is proposed aimed at testing the perceptual features of different synthetic voices considering some fundamental aspects of human–computer interaction, namely users’ acceptance and expectations. More specifically, the effect of synthetic voices’ gender and quality on user’s preferences were investigated. The study involved 40 participants, recruited in Northern Ireland, split into two groups: mental health experts and participants living with depression and/or anxiety. Six synthetic voices, three females and three males, characterized by different quality levels were developed for the experiment, exploiting free online synthesizers. The Virtual Agent Voice Acceptance Questionnaire (VAVAQ) was used to collect data regarding preferences toward the different synthetic voices. Results showed that participants’ preferences seem to be affected by both the gender and the quality of a synthetic voice. In particular, participants preferred female voices and high-quality voices. Results also seem to suggest that the quality of a synthetic voice could have a stronger impact on users’ evaluations compared to voice’s gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (2017) Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates (No. WHO/MSD/MER/2017.2)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reinert R, Fritze D, Nguyen T (2021) The state of mental health in America. Mental Health America

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corrigan PW (2000) Mental health stigma as social attribution: implications for research methods and attitude change. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 7(1):48–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell Á, Navarro‐Pérez JJ, Mestre MV (2020) Challenges and barriers in mental healthcare systems and their impact on the family: a systematic integrative review. Health & Soc Care Commun

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beilby LJ, Zakos J, McLaughlin GA (2014) U.S. Patent No. 8,630,961. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

    Google Scholar 

  6. McTear MF, Callejas Z, Griol D (2016) The conversational interface, vol 6, no 94. Springer, Cham, p 102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Araujo T (2018) Living up to the chatbot hype: the influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput Hum Behav 85:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elmasri D, Maeder A (2016) A conversational agent for an online mental health intervention. In: International conference on brain informatics. Springer, Cham, pp 243–251

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang J, Li Q, Xue Y, Cheng T, Xu S, Jia J, Feng L (2015) Teenchat: a chatterbot system for sensing and releasing adolescents’ stress. In: International conference on health information science. Springer, Cham, pp 133–145

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lovejoy CA (2019) Technology and mental health: the role of artificial intelligence. Eur Psychiatry 55:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamita T, Ito T, Matsumoto A, Munakata T, Inoue T (2019) A chatbot system for mental healthcare based on SAT counseling method. Mobile Inf Syst

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gardiner PM, McCue KD, Negash LM, Cheng T, White LF, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Jack B, Bickmore TW (2017) Engaging women with an embodied conversational agent to deliver mindfulness and lifestyle recommendations: a feasibility randomized control trial. Patient Educ Couns 100(9):1720–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Delahunty F, Wood ID, Arcan M (2018) First insights on a passive major depressive disorder prediction system with incorporated conversational chatbot. In: AICS, pp 327–338

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rick SR, Goldberg AP, Weibel N (2019) SleepBot: encouraging sleep hygiene using an intelligent chatbot. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on intelligent user interfaces: companion, pp 107–108

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gaffney H, Mansell W, Edwards R, Wright J (2014) Manage Your Life Online (MYLO): a pilot trial of a conversational computer-based intervention for problem solving in a student sample. Behav Cogn Psychother 42(6):731–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Falala-Séchet C, Antoine L, Thiriez I, Bungener C (2019) Owlie: a chatbot that provides emotional support for coping with psychological difficulties. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on intelligent virtual agents, pp 236–237

    Google Scholar 

  17. Inkster B, Sarda S, Subramanian V (2018) An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (Wysa) for digital mental well-being: real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6(11)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M (2017) Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health 4(2)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fulmer R, Joerin A, Gentile B, Lakerink L, Rauws M (2018) Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health 5(4)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zamora J (2017) I’m sorry, Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that: chatbot perception and expectations. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human agent interaction, pp 253–260

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zumstein D, Hundertmark S (2017) Chatbots—an interactive technology for personalized communication, transactions and services. IADIS Int J WWW/Internet 15(1)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tatai G, Csordás A, Kiss Á, Szaló A, Laufer L (2003) Happy chatbot, happy user. In: International workshop on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar MN, Chandar PL, Prasad AV, Sumangali K (2016) Android based educational chatbot for visually impaired people. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiaráin NN, Chasaide AN (2016) Chatbot technology with synthetic voices in the acquisition of an endangered language: motivation, development, and evaluation of a platform for Irish. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’16), pp 3429–3435

    Google Scholar 

  25. Esposito A, Amorese T, Cuciniello M, Esposito AM, Troncone A, Torres MI, Schlohl S, Cordasco G (2018) Seniors’ acceptance of virtual humanoid agents. In: Italian forum of ambient assisted living. Springer, Cham, pp 429–443

    Google Scholar 

  26. Esposito A, Amorese T, Cuciniello M, Riviello MT, Esposito AM, Troncone A, Cordasco G (2019) Elder user’s attitude toward assistive virtual agents: the role of voice and gender. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  27. Esposito A, Amorese T, Cuciniello M, Riviello MT, Esposito AM, Troncone A, Cordasco G (2019) The dependability of voice on elders’ acceptance of humanoid agents. In: 20th annual conference of the international speech communication association: crossroads of speech and language, INTERSPEECH 2019, Vol 2019. International Speech Communication Association, pp 31–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chang RCS, Lu HP, Yang P (2018) Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan. Comput Human Behav 84:194–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mullennix JW, Stern SE, Wilson SJ, Dyson CL (2003) Social perception of male and female computer synthesized speech. Comput Human Behav 19(4):407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stevens C, Lees N, Vonwiller J, Burnham D (2005) On-line experimental methods to evaluate text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis: effects of voice gender and signal quality on intelligibility, naturalness, and preference. Comput Speech Lang 19(2):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ebert DD, Donkin L, Andersson G, Andrews G, Berger T, Carlbring P et al (2016) Does Internet-based guided-self-help for depression cause harm? An individual participant data meta-analysis on deterioration rates and its moderators in randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med 46(13):2679–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lucas GM, Gratch J, King A, Morency LP (2014) It’s only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput Human Behav 37:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bickmore TW, Mitchell SE, Jack BW, Paasche-Orlow MK, Pfeifer LM, O’Donnell J (2010) Response to a relational agent by hospital patients with depressive symptoms. Interact Comput 22(4):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mortada D (2019) Meet Q, the first gender-neutral voice assistant. NPR

    Google Scholar 

  35. Simon M (2019) The genderless digital voice the world needs right now. Wired

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the following projects:

• Project EMPATHIC, N. 769872, Horizon 2020

• Project MENHIR, N. 823907, Horizon 2020

• Project SIROBOTICS, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università, e della Ricerca (MIUR)

• Project ANDROIDS, N. 157264, V: ALERE 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Amorese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amorese, T. et al. (2024). Assessing Synthetic Voices for Mental Health Chatbots. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, R.S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Eighth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. ICICT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 695. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3043-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3043-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3042-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3043-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics