Skip to main content

Content Moderator Startle Response: A Qualitative Study

  • 108 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS,volume 695)

Abstract

Commercial content moderators review user-generated content (UGC) to ensure the posts meet platform policies, guidelines, community standards, and regional laws. While the majority of posted UGC is deemed acceptable, a large amount of content remains, which is classified as non-compliant and may include gore, violence, suicide, child sexual abuse material (CSAM), and pornography, to name a few. Because of this, content moderators have a greater prevalence of their nervous system activating a startle response, which can impact emotional, psychological, and physiological processes. Prior research on content moderators has failed to explore moderators’ initial reactions to content from the start of employment through tenure as the subjection to material and habituation increases. This study takes an in-depth look at moderators’ experiences from recruiting, through training, and production to better understand the content moderators’ startle response and factors that enable startle habituation. The current study sample consisted of 78 total respondents—38 content moderators in the Philippines employed by TaskUs Inc. and 40 in Estonia employed by Sutherland Global Services. Employee tenure ranged from 0 to 6 months. Succeeding our analysis, transparency, understanding, and preparedness were major themes identified as the critical factors found within both companies when exploring the activation of the startle response and facilitation of habituation following content exposure. These themes were prevalent in the employment life-cycle's recruiting, training, and production phases.

Keywords

  • Commercial content moderation
  • Startle response
  • Startle habituation
  • Well-being
  • Resilience
  • Employee life cycle
  • Recruiting
  • Training

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arsht A, Etcovitch D (2018) The human cost of online content moderation. Harvard Law Review Online, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Retrieved from https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/the-human-cost-ofonline-contentmoderation

  2. Beg M (2015) Socio-physicochemical interpretation of theory on emotions. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1825.4241

  3. Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Cuthbert BN, Lang PJ (2001). Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion 276–298

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carmi E (2019) The hidden listeners: regulating the line from telephone operators to content moderators. Int J Commun 13:440–458

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newton C (2019) The trauma floor. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/25/18229714/cognizant-facebook-content-moderator-interviews-trauma-working-conditions-arizona

  6. Chandrasekharan E, Gandhi C, Mustelier MW, Gilbert E (2019) Crossmod: a cross-community learning-based system to assist reddit moderators. In: Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol 3(CSCW), pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen A (2014) The laborers who keep dick pics and beheadings out of your facebook feed. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/

  8. Chen GD, Radziwon KE, Kashanian N, Manohar S, Salvi R (2014) Salicylate-induced auditory perceptual disorders and plastic changes in nonclassical auditory centers in rats. Neural Plast 2014:658741

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Chotiner I (2019) The underworld of online content moderation. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-underworld-of-online-content-moderation

  10. Dang B, Riedl MJ, Lease M (2018) But who protects the moderators? The case of crowdsourced image moderation. Cornell University

    Google Scholar 

  11. De la Casa LG, Mena A, Ruiz-Salas JC (2016) Effect of stress and attention on startle response and prepulse inhibition. Physiol Behav 165:179–186

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Deuter CE, Kuehl LK, Blumenthal TD, Schulz A, Oitzl MS, Schachinger H (2012) Effects of cold pressor stress on the human startle response. PloS One 7(11)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gorwa R, Binns R, Katzenbach C (2020) Algorithmic content moderation: technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data Soc 7(1):2053951719897945

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartman ME, Ladwig MA, Ekkekakis P (2021) Contactless differentiation of pleasant and unpleasant valence: asssessment of the acoustic startle eye blink response with infrared reflectance oculography. Behav Res Meth 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kiger ME, Varpio L (2020) Thematic analysis of qualitative data: Amee Guide no. 131. Med Teach 42(8):846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030

  16. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1990) Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychol Rev 97(3):377–395

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Maguire M, Delahunt B (2017) Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland J Teach Learn High Educ 9(3):3351–33514. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335

  18. Martin WL, Murray PS, Bates PR (2012) The effects of startle on pilots during critical events: a case study analysis. In: Aviation psychology and applied human factors—working toward sezo accidents Conference 2012. Griffith University, pp 387–394

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mukhopadhyay B (2020) Warning: the (open) secret lives of content moderators. Cassandra voices. https://cassandravoices.com/society-culture/society/warning-the-open-secret-lives-of-content-moderators/

  20. Nielsen Norman Group (2000) Why you only need to test with 5 users. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/#:~:text=Not%20true

  21. Phelps BJ, Doyle-Lunders L, Harsin-Waite A, Hofman N, Knutson LM (2012) Demonstrating habituation of a startle response to loud noise. Behav Anal Today 13(1):17–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100714

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Reagh ZM, Knight DC (2013) Negative, but not positive emotional images modulate the startle response independent of conscious awareness. Emotion 13(4):782

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts ST (2016) Commercial content moderation: digital laborers’ dirty work. Western Lib 12

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schachter S, Singer J (1962) Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychol Rev 69(5):379–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046234

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Silbermann J (2020) They’re looking out for the internet. But who’s looking out for them? Onlabor. https://onlabor.org/theyre-looking-out-for-the-internet-but-whos-looking-out-for-them/

  26. Steiger M (2020) Building a resilient workforce: programming for commercial content moderation staff.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steiger M, Bharucha TJ, Venkatagiri S, Riedl MJ, Lease M (2021) The psychological well-being of content moderators: the emotional labor of commercial moderation and avenues for improving support. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vaidyanathan U, Malone SM, Miller MB, McGue M, Iacono WG (2014) Heritability and molecular genetic basis of acoustic startle eye blink and affectively modulated startle response: a genome-wide association study. Psychophysiology 51(12):1285–1299

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Valsamis B, Schmid S (2011) Habituation and prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle in rodents. J Vis Exp 55:e3446

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express deep gratitude for those content moderators who participated in the research and so willingly shared their experiences. With this knowledge, we can better support the well-being of all reviewers. Additionally, the authors would like to thank content moderators worldwide for the tremendous and much-needed work that they do safeguarding the internet and social media platforms for the end-user.

Funding

The research study was conducted without any external funding (Table 1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

TaskUs Inc. and Sutherland Global Services employ the authors and content moderators interviewed for the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bharucha, T., Steiger, M.E., Manchanda, P., Mere, R., Huang, X. (2024). Content Moderator Startle Response: A Qualitative Study. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, R.S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Eighth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. ICICT 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 695. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3043-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3043-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-3042-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-3043-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)