Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Trends and Recent Advances in Civil Engineering

TRACE 2022: Recent Developments in Water Resources and Transportation Engineering pp 183–206Cite as

Climate and Water-Related Disasters and Eco-DRR (Disaster Risk Reduction) Sensitivity in Island Nations: Overview Analysis

Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE,volume 353)

Abstract

Atmospheric, geological, or hydrologic natural hazards occur at a variety of scales, from local to regional levels. These hazards lead to disasters when combined with vulnerability conditions and inadequate measures to mitigate the consequences. Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is a proactive approach aimed at reducing disaster risks by systematically analyzing the multiple factors that contribute to disasters. Integrated DRR involves building resilience in communities by (a) enhancing capacity building and knowledge sharing; (b) implementing mechanisms like early warning systems or solutions that can support the prevention of loss of lives and assets; (c) offering policy advice at the intersection of natural and social sciences, other areas (culture, education, communication, etc.); (d) boosting collaboration with key actors, including governments from national, state, and local level, civil societies, academia, and international organizations. An ecosystem-based approach to disaster reduction (Eco-DRR) has gained much attention around the world. The vulnerability of small island nations to natural hazards is high, and the consequences of disasters are devastating. Due to geographic location and limited resources, islands are highly susceptible to natural hazards such as hurricanes, water scarcity, earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions. The impact of these disasters can be long-lasting and far-reaching. In this synthesis, to highlight integrating ECO-DRR contributes significantly to reducing disaster risks. Effective ECO-DRR remains crucial for island communities to build resilience and prepare for the potential consequences of disaster impacts. In addition, stakeholders in these nations require systematic efforts to assess and manage direct and indirect factors that exacerbate the effects of disasters, such as resilient infrastructure in the water sector and other sectors.

Keywords

  • Eco-DRR
  • Risk governance
  • NBS
  • Hazards
  • Island nations

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adam W, Whelchel, Reguero BG, van Wesenbeeck B, Renaud FG, Advancing disaster risk reduction through the integration of science, design, and policy into eco-engineering and several global resource frames. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.030

  2. ADRC (2023) Information on disaster risk reduction of the member countries-Philippines (the). Retrieved from AsianDisaster Reduction Center: https://www.adrc.asia/nationinformation.php?NationCode=608&Lang=en

  3. Adriadapt (2023) AdriAdapt. Retrieved from Disaster Risk Reduction using eco-system services—Eco-DRR: https://adriadapt.eu/

  4. Alexander D (2013) Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2707–2716. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013(2013)

  5. Bo-Young H, Heo W-H (2019) Economic analysis of disaster management investment effectiveness in Korea. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113011

  6. Bogardi JJ, Fekete A (2018) Disaster-related resilience as ability and process: A concept guiding the analysis of response behavior before, during and after extreme events. Am J Clim Change 54–78

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bronfman NC, Cisternas PC, Repetto PB, Castañeda JV, Guic E (2020) Understanding the relationship between direct experience and risk perception of natural hazards. Risk analysis 40:2057–2070. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13526

  8. Cameron TA (2005) Individual option prices for climate change mitigation. J Publ Econ 283–301

    Google Scholar 

  9. Combest-Friedman C, Christie P, Miles E (2012) Household perceptions of coastal hazards and climate change in the Central Philippines. J Env Manag 137–148

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cvetković D, Nešović A, Terzić I (2021) Impact of people’s behavior on the energy sustainability of the residential sector in emergency situations caused by COVID-19. Energy build 230:110532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110532. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PMID: 33071442; PMCID: PMC7546652

  11. CLPU (2013) CLPU Guidebook, a guide to comprehensive land use plan preparation. Retrieved from League of Cities of the Philippines Secretariat: https://lcp.org.ph/UserFiles/League_of_Cities/file/HLURB_CLUP_Guidebook_Vol_1_11042015.pdf

  12. Davoudi S, Lawrence J, Bohland J (2018 [October]) Anatomy of the resilience machine. The resilience machine. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351211185-2

  13. Dedicatoria RMM, Diomampo CB (2019) Status of climate change adaptation in Southeast Asia region. In status of climate change adaptation in Asia and the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99347-8_8

  14. Dissanayaka KDCR, Tanaka N, Vinodh TLC (2022) Integration of Eco-DRR and hybrid defense system on mitigation of natural disasters (Tsunami and Coastal Flooding): a review. Nat Hazards 110:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04965-6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. European Commission (2023). Nature-based solutions. retrieved from european research executive agency: https://rea.ec.europa.eu/funding-and-grants/horizon-europe-cluster-6-food-bioeconomy-natural-resources-agriculture-and-environment/nature-based-solutions_en#:~:text=The%20Commission%20defines%20nature%2Dbased,benefits%20and%20help%20build%20resilience.

  16. Furuta N, Seino S (2016) Progress and Gaps in Eco-DRR policy and implementation after the great East Japan earthquake. In: Renaud F, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Estrella M, Nehren U (eds) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and adaptation in practice. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_13

  17. Gheuens J, Nagabhatla N, Perera EDP (2019) Disaster-risk, water security challenges and strategies in small island developing states (SIDS). Water 11:637. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040637

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Greiving S, Glade T (2013) Risk governance. In: Bobrowsky PT (eds) Encyclopedia of natural hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_298

  19. Government of Japan (2015) National plan for adaptation to the impacts of climate change. Tokyo: Government of Japan

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hallegatte S, Fay M, Barbier E (2018) Poverty and climate change: introduction. Environment and development economics 23(3):217–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X18000141

  21. History (2023) The 2004 Tsunami wiped away towns with ‘mind-boggling’ destruction. Retrieved from History: https://www.history.com/news/deadliest-tsunami-2004-indian-ocean

  22. Howe PD, Marlon JR, Mildenberger M, Shield BS (2019) How will climate change shape climate opinion? environmental reserach. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab466a

  23. Isao E, Sagara J, van Wesenbeeck B (2022) How nature-based solutions can help reduce flood risks. Retrieved from UNDRR-Prevention Web: https://www.preventionweb.net/news/how-nature-based-solutions-can-help-reduce-flood-risks

  24. IRGC (2023) What is risk governance? Retrieved from International Risk Governance Council: https://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster-risk-governance

  25. IUCN (2020) Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions. A user-friendly framework for the verification, design, and scaling up of NBS. First edition. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN

    Google Scholar 

  26. JICA (2013) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR), JICA‚s Eco-DRR cooperation in developing countries. Retrieved from Forest and Natural Environment Group, Global Environment Department, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA): https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/thematic_issues/disaster/c8h0vm0000bvqtv9-att/Ecosystem-basedDisasterRiskReduction.pdf

  27. Klein JA, Tucker CM, Steger CE, Nolin A, Reid R, Hopping KA, Yeh ET, Pradhan MS, Taber A, Molden D, Ghate R, Choudhury D, Alcántara-Ayala I, Lavorel S, Müller B, Grêt-Regamey A, Boone RB, Bourgeron P, Castellanos E, Chen X, Dong S, Keiler M, Seidl R, Thorn J, Yager K (2019) An integrated community and ecosystem-based approach to disaster risk reduction in mountain systems. Environ Sci Policy 94:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.034

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Laddaporn R, Vojinovic Z, Di Sabatino S, Leo LS, Capobianco5 V, Oen5 AMP, McClain1,2 ME, Lopez-Gunn6 E (2020) Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: a state-of-the-art review of the research area. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:243–270

    Google Scholar 

  29. Melissa LF, Acosta J, Wicker A, Whipkey K (2020) Short-term solutions to a long-term challenge: rethinking disaster recovery planning to reduce vulnerabilities and inequities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020482

  30. Matić BB, Karleuša B (2022) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction framework as a tool for improved river basin natural water retention capacity and environmental hazard resilience. Environ Sci Proc 21(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022021040

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Mizutori M (2020) Reflections on the sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: five years since its adoption. Int J Disaster Risk Sci, 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  32. MOE-Japan (2016) Eco-system based disaster risk reduction in Japan: a handbook for practitioners. Tokyo: Ministry of the Environment (Japan)

    Google Scholar 

  33. MOFA-JAPAN (2023) Disasters and disaster prevention in Japan. Retrieved from Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan: https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/disaster/21st/2.html

  34. Muhammad TC, Piracha A (2021) Natural disasters—origins, impacts, management. Encyclopedia, 1101–1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1040084

  35. Nadeera R, Palmer C, Dissanayake P, Yuwono TE (2022).Can nature-based solutions be an answer to the climate crisis? Retrieved from World Bank Blogs: https://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/can-nature-based-solutions-be-answer-climate-crisis

  36. Nicolas F, Sgobbi A, Happaerts S, Raynal J, Schmidt L (2017) Translating the Sendai Framework into action: the EU approach to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.015

  37. Niekerk DV (2011) Introduction to disaster risk reduction. Potchefstroom, South Africa: USAID, the united states agency for international development, The African Centre for Disaster Studies NWU Potchefstroom

    Google Scholar 

  38. OCHA (2022 [2021]) Disasters in numbers. New York: Reliefweb

    Google Scholar 

  39. O’Sullivan F, Mell I, Clement S (2020) Novel Solutions or rebranded approaches: evaluating the use of nature-based solutions (NBS) in Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, Vol 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.572527

  40. Partners for Resilience (2023) Up-scaling ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction, Phillipine. Retrieved from Partners for Resilience: https://www.partnersforresilience.nl/en/programmes/up-scaling-eco-drr

  41. Raza T (2018) Localizing disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in planners’ and decision makers’ agenda: Technical comprehensive model, Quezon City, Philippines. Procedia Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.169

  42. Republic of the Philippines CO (2009) Republic Act No. 10121. Manila: Republic of the Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rocque RJ, Beaudoin C, Ndjaboue R (2021) Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews Open 11:e046333. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333

  44. Ruangpan L, Vojinovic Z, Di Sabatino S, Leo LS, Capobianco V, Oen AMP, McClain ME, Lopez-Gunn E (2020) Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: a state-of-the-art review of the research area. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:243–270. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. Sorensen C, Saunik S, Sehgal M, Tewary A, Govindan M, Lemery J, Balbus J (2018) Climate change and women's health: impacts and opportunities in India. Advancing earth and space science 2(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GH000163

  46. Sowińska-Świerkosz B, García J (2022) A new evaluation framework for nature-based solutions (NBS) projects based on the application of performance questions and indicators approach. Sci Total Environ 787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147615

  47. World Economic Forum (2022) The global risks report. Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  48. Twigg J (2015) Disaster risk reduction. Good Practice Review 9. Humanitarian practice network, Overseas Development Institute. London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  49. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations; Geneva, Switzerland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  50. UNECE (2023) Sendai framework. Retrieved from UNECE: https://unece.org/sendai-framework

  51. UNDRR (2017) Disaster risk and resilience. Retrieved from UNDRR-Prevension web: https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/key-concepts/resilience

  52. UNDRR (2017) Understanding disaster risk, Vulnarability. Retrieved from UNDRR-Prevension Web: https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/component-risk/vulnerability

  53. UNDRR (2019) Trees have major role in disaster risk reduction, Eco-Drr Course Agrees. Retrieved from UNDRR-Prevension Web: https://www.preventionweb.net/news/trees-have-major-role-disaster-risk-reduction-eco-drr-course-agrees

  54. UNDRR (2020) The human cost of disasters: an overview of the last 20 years (2000–2019). Belgium: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

    Google Scholar 

  55. UNDRR (2021) Nature-based solutions for disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

    Google Scholar 

  56. UNDRR (2023) Vulnerability. Retrieved from Understanding Disaster Risk: https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/component-risk/vulnerability

  57. UNDRR (2023). Disaster risk reduction & disaster risk management. Retrieved from Understanding Disaster Risk: https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/key-concepts/disaster-risk-reduction-disaster-risk-management

  58. UNDRR (2017) In The Philippines, Mangroves are a valuable flood defense. Retrieved from UNDRR-Prevention Web: https://www.preventionweb.net/news/philippines-mangroves-are-valuable-flood-defense

  59. Valdez AIA (2018) The paradox of the salvage zone: examining the philippine coastal adaptation framework in the light of tropical cyclones and threats of sea level rise. The Melbourne law school 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  60. Walton D, Arrighi J, van Aalst M, Claudet M (2021) The compound impact of extreme weather events and COVID-19. IFRC, Geneva 34pc

    Google Scholar 

  61. World Bank (2018) Can Colombo reinvent itself as a Wetland City? Retrieved from World bank: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/02/01/can-colombo-reinvent-itself-as-wetland-city

  62. Zsido AN, Arato N, Inhof O, Matuz-Budai T, Stecina DT, Labadi B (2022) Psychological well-being, risk factors, and coping strategies with social isolation and new challenges in times of adversity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Psychol (Amst). 225:103538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103538. Epub 2022 Feb 21. PMID: 35219042; PMCID: PMC8858700

Download references

Acknowledgements

Contributions from the UNU-CRIS author are supported by the Flemish Government (Kingdom of Belgium) and the working partner of UNU-CRIS—Ghent University and the Vrije Universiteit, Brussels. We would also like to acknowledge the collaboration with The United Nations University Climate Resilience Initiative (https://cri.merit.unu.edu/) that allowed exchange and discourse on this topic since August 2021 and PEDRR (https://pedrr.org/) for thematic discussions and as a network facilitating exchange on the topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Architecture, Planning and Public Affairs, University of Texas at Arlington (UTA), Arlington, TX, USA

    Padmi Ranasinghe

  2. Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (UNU-CRIS), United Nations University, Bruges, Belgium

    Padmi Ranasinghe & Nidhi Nagabhatla

  3. School of Geography Earth Science and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

    Nidhi Nagabhatla

  4. United Nations University - Maastricht University (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Kelly Vrijens

Authors
  1. Padmi Ranasinghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nidhi Nagabhatla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly Vrijens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Padmi Ranasinghe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (CRIS), United Nations University, Brugge, Belgium

    Nidhi Nagabhatla

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Director, Center for Research and Education in Advanced Transportation Engineering Systems (CREATEs), Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA

    Yusuf Mehta

  3. Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

    Brijesh Kumar Yadav

  4. Flexible Pavement Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, Delhi, India

    Ambika Behl

  5. Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Madhuri Kumari

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 NBS program for Eco-DRR in the Philippines
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ranasinghe, P., Nagabhatla, N., Vrijens, K. (2024). Climate and Water-Related Disasters and Eco-DRR (Disaster Risk Reduction) Sensitivity in Island Nations: Overview Analysis. In: Nagabhatla, N., Mehta, Y., Yadav, B.K., Behl, A., Kumari, M. (eds) Recent Developments in Water Resources and Transportation Engineering. TRACE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 353. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2905-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2905-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2904-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2905-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

search

Navigation