Skip to main content

A Way Forward for Preschool Teacher Education and Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technological Innovations in Education

Abstract

In Sweden educational technology is an integrated and all-round accepted component of the preschool curriculum (Lpfö18) and both the National Agency for Education and the European Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027) underlines the importance of digitally competent and confident teachers. Assuming a social constructivist approach, this chapter explores the possibility that technological competence is not simply inherent in actions performed, rather it is a mode of thinking that is applied when considering how to address unsolved problems. The main focus of the study is thus to investigate teacher attitudes to learning, where learning is seen as a collaborative co-constructed product of the teacher and child. The chapter does this through mapping the current state of technology in relation to Swedish ECEC practice against the background of steering documents, and the preschool teacher education program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andreotti, V. (2011). Towards decoloniality and diversality in global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9, 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in sociology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., & Grimley, L. (2001). Parenting in the global community: A cross cultural perspective. In M. Fine & S. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of diversity in parent education (pp. 97–132). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. (2014). Utdanningens vidunderlige risiko. Bergen Fagbokforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbour, M. (2020). Using digital technology in early education teaching: learning from teachers’ teaching practice with interactive whiteboard. International Journal of Early Years Education [Online], 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1997). The ecology of developmental processes. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charioca, V., Siraj-Blatchford, J., Pramling-Samuelsson, I., Sherida, S., Esparteiro, B., Saude, S., Passarinho, A., Espirito Santo, A., Nuez, R., & Genova, K. (2005). ICT in the early years: Handbook for trainers. Impresso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danby, S., Fleer, M., Davidson, C., & Hatzigianni, M. (Eds.). (2018). Digital childhoods: Technologies and children’s everyday lives (Vol. 22). Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshof, L. (2003). Technological education, interdisciplinarity, and the journey toward sustainable development: Nurturing new communities of practice. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 3, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshof, L. (2005). Teacher’s interpretation of sustainable development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshof, L. (2009). Toward sustainable practices in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshof, L. (2020). Transcending the age of stupid: Learning to imagine ourselves differently. Journal for Activist Science & Technology Education, 1(1), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, K. (2018). Education for sustainable development and narratives of Nordic exceptionalism: The contributions of decolonialism, Nordidactica. Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filho, W., Evangelos, M., & Pace, P. (2009). Education for sustainable development: Current discourses and practices and their relevance to technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Turnbull. (2019). Enhancing the learning of technology in early childhood settings, Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, J. (2003). Piaget, pedagogy, and evolutionary psychology, evolutionary psychology. human-nature.com, 1, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. N. (2010). Reflections concerning technology: A case for the philosophy of technology in early childhood teacher education and professional development programs. In S. Izumi-Taylor, S. Blake (Eds.), Technology for early childhood education and socialization: developmental applications and methodologies (pp. 1–19). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. (2010). The ‘art’ of creative teaching: implications for higher education. Teaching in education, 15(5), 607–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J., Elvstrand, H., & Hellberg, K. (2015). Gender and technology in free play in Swedish early childhood education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, S., & Super, C. (1993). The developmental niche: Implications for children’s literacy development. In L. Eldering & P. Leseman (Eds.), Early interaction and culture: Preparation for literacy. The interface between theory and practice (pp. 115–132). UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernwall, P. (2016). ‘We have to be professional’—Swedish preschool teachers’ conceptualization of digital media. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. M., & Elshof, L. (2007). Sustainable practices as an aspect of technological literacy: Research findings from secondary school teachersʼ and their classrooms. Presented at the PATT-18 Pupils Attitudes Towards technology International Conference on Design and Technology education research, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., Green, L., Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight: Young children and their internet use. EU Kids. Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52630/1/Zero_to_eight.pdf

  • Kelly, S. K., Sharpe, R. M., & Fotou, N. (2022). Early years and key stage 1 teachers’ attitudes towards outdoor and online play. Education, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsson, B. (2018). Green machines? Destabilizing discourse in technology education for sustainable development. Critical Education, 9(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larke, L. R. (2019). Agentic neglect: Teachers as gatekeepers of England’s national computing curriculum. British Journal of Educational Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12744

  • Layton, D. (1992). Values and design and technology, design curriculum matters. Loughborough University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marklund, L. (2019). Swedish preschool teachers’ perceptions about digital play in a workplace-learning context. Early Years. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2019.1658065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertala, P. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in early childhood education: A meta-ethnographical synthesis of qualitative research. Computers in Human Behavior, 101(2019), 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlöf, C., Höst, G. E., & Hallström, J. (2017). Swedish technology teachers’ attitudes to their subject and its teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlöf, C., Hallström, J., & Höst, G.E. (2019) Self-efficacy or context dependency? Exploring teachers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the use of educational robotics: Exploring pre-service and in-service early childhood teacher profiles. Educational Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2006). Technology education for sustainable futures. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 11(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2013). Teaching and learning for sustainable development: ESD research in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 733–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2018). Sustainability as a transformative factor for teaching and learning in technology education. Handbook of Technology Education, 827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2011). PATT 25; CRIPT 8—Perspectives on learning in design & technology education. Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J., & Lubben, F. (2009). The social agenda of education for sustainable development within design and technology: The case of the sustainable design award. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(2), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J., Taisch, M., & Ortega Mier, M. O. (2017). Influencing factors to facilitate sustainable consumption: From the experts’ viewpoints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(1), 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J. (Ed.). (2006). Developing new technologies for young children. Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2009). Education for sustainable development in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2015). Is it time to remove ICT from the early learning goals? Early Years Educator, 17(8), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Brock, L. (2016, April). Early childhood digital play and the zone of proximal developmental flow (ZPDF). Proceedings I Congreso Internacional de Innovacion Y Tecnologia Educativa en Educacion Infantil, Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Palmer, N. (2011). Knowledge, learning processes and ICT in early childhood education. He Kupu, 2(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Whitebread, D. (2003). EBOOK: Supporting ICT in the early years. McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., & Edwards, S. (2015). Digital play and technologies in the early years. Early years (London, England) [Online], 35(2), 227–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H-Y., Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). Your guide to outstanding childhood practice in ICT. Practical Pre-Sxchool Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Agency for Education [Skolverket]. (2010). Education Act 2010:800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Agency for Education [Skolverket]. (2016). Preschool Curriculum. [Läroplan för förskolan, Lpfö], 1998, and the amended Preschool Curriculum 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M., & von Otter, A.-M. (2008. June 18–21). Technology teachers’ different ways of thinking about sustainable development in technology education research and practice. In N. Seerly, J. Buckley, D. Canty, & J. Phelan (Eds.), Technology education: Perspectives on human capacity and development, PATT36 International conference. Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undheim, M. (2021). Children and teachers engaging together with digital technology in early childhood education and care institutions: A literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2002, September). Report of the world summit on sustainable development. Johannesburg. A/Conf.199/20* Accessed at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/478154?ln=en

  • University of Borås. (2022). Educational plan for the Preschool teacher program. University of Borås Sweden. https://kursinfodoc.hb.se/PdfMaker.aspx?type=program&code=LGFÖR&revision=19,100&language=SV

  • Wodak, R. (2011). Complex texts: Analysing, understanding, explaining and interpreting meanings. Discourse Studies, 13(5), 623–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, N. (2017). Teaching and learning with tablets: A case study of twenty-first-century skills and new learning. In N. Kucirkova & G. Falloon (Eds.), Apps, technology and younger learners: International evidence for teaching (pp. 57–72). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Frank, K. (2006). The social life of technology: An ecological analysis of technology diffusion in schools. Pedagogies, 1(2), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Yngvesson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yngvesson, T., Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2023). A Way Forward for Preschool Teacher Education and Technology. In: Garvis, S., Keane, T. (eds) Technological Innovations in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2785-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2785-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2784-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2785-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics