Skip to main content

Evaluation of Self Compacting Concrete with Fiber and Bagasse Ash

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Construction Materials and Management (ACMM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 346))

  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

The most versatile civil engineering construction material, concrete, because of its good compressive strength and flexibility, in handling as well as ability to shape it to required form, suffers from a few disadvantages because of its low tensile strength and durability. Another issue is that the production of important component of concrete, cement, is very energy consuming and impacts environment in all stages of production. To reduce these issues and also reduce the cost involved in cement, many supplementary cementitious materials are considered to substitute cement to the extent possible without impairing its mechanical properties. The tensile strength of concrete depends only with reinforcement, which is mainly steel bars. In this study industrial fiber i.e. Recron 3S is proposed to use as reinforcement and abundantly available Bagasse ash a pozzolanic materials as a replacing cement to the extent possible. Another problem in using concrete is that it requires compaction after placing, which is not always possible. This issue is circumvented by using self-compacting concrete. A study has been undertaken to produce SCC with different amounts of bagasse ash replacing the cement and with industrial fiber as reinforcement. To reduce high requirement of water for SCC required amount of superplasticizers used. The water content is determined based on slump tests, L box tests and V funnel test to obtain satisfactory passing ability and flowability for M50 concrete, respectively. Mechanical properties (compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength) of this concrete with different amounts of bagasse ash are determined after curing for periods up to 90 days. Results showed that 10% replacement of cement with bagasse ash can maintain good mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdul-Wahab, S. A., Al-Dhamri, H., Ram, G., & Chatterjee, V. P. (2021). An overview of alternative raw materials used in cement and clinker manufacturing. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1822949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabatabaeian, M., Khaloo, A., Joshaghani, A., & Hajibandeh, E. (2017). Experimental investigation on effects of hybrid fibers on rheological, mechanical, and durability properties of high-strength SCC. Construction and Building Materials, 147, 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azmee, N. M., & Shafiq, N. (2018). Ultra-high performance concrete: From fundamental to applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 9, e00197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sobolev, K., Kozhukhova, M., Sideris, K., Menéndez, E., & Santhanam, M. (2018). Alternative supplementary cementitious materials. In RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports (Vol. 25, pp. 233–282).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luhar, S., Cheng, T. W., & Luhar, I. (2019). Incorporation of natural waste from agricultural and aquacultural farming as supplementary materials with green concrete: A review. Composites Part B: Engineering, 175, 107076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zahedi, M., Ramezanianpour, A. A., & Ramezanianpour, A. M. (2015). Evaluation of the mechanical properties and durability of cement mortars containing nanosilica and rice husk ash under chloride ion penetration. Construction and Building Materials, 78, 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordeiro, G. C., Toledo Filho, R. D., Tavares, L. M., & Fairbairn, E. M. R. (2012). Experimental characterization of binary and ternary blended-cement concretes containing ultrafine residual rice husk and sugar cane bagasse ashes. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shah, V., Scrivener, K., Bhattacharjee, B., & Bishnoi, S. (2018). Changes in microstructure characteristics of cement paste on carbonation. Cement and Concrete Research, 109, 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chusilp, N., Jaturapitakkul, C., & Kiattikomol, K. (2009). Utilization of bagasse ash as a pozzolanic material in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 3352–3358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karim, M. R., et al. (2014). On the utilization of pozzolanic wastes as an alternative resource of cement. Materials, 7, 7809–7827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Soares, M. M. N. S., Garcia, D. C. S., Figueiredo, R. B., Aguilar, M. T. P., & Cetlin, P. R. (2016). Comparing the pozzolanic behavior of sugar cane bagasse ash to amorphous and crystalline SiO2. Cement and Concrete Composites, 71, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arenas-Piedrahita, J. C., et al. (2016). Mechanical and durability properties of mortars prepared with untreated sugarcane bagasse ash and untreated fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 105, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brogan C. (2021) Best ways to cut carbon emissions from the cement industry explored.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, N., & Wang, R. (2015). Sustainable technologies for the reclamation of greenhouse gas CO2. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakir, S., Raman, S. N., Safiuddin, M., Kaish, A. B. M. A., & Mutalib, A. A. (2020). Utilization of by-products and wastes as supplementary cementitious materials in structural mortar for sustainable construction. Sustainability, 12, 3888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuman, L., & Tucker, J. (1943). Tensile and other properties of concretes made with various types of cements. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Stands, 31, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbas, S., Sharif, A., Ahmed, A., Abbass, W., & Shaukat, S. (2020). Prospective of sugarcane bagasse ash for controlling the alkali-silica reaction in concrete incorporating reactive aggregates. Structural Concrete, 21, 781–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pillai, R. G., Gettu, R., & Santhanam, M. (2020). Use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in reinforced concrete systems – benefits and limitations. Revista ALCONPAT, 10, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Figueiredo, R. L., & Pavía, S. (2020). A study of the parameters that determine the reactivity of sugarcane bagasse ashes (SCBA) for use as a binder in construction. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Subedi, S., et al. (2021). Properties of engineered cementitious composites with raw sugarcane bagasse ash used as sand replacement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33, 04021231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pacewska, B., & Wilińska, I. (2020) Usage of supplementary cementitious materials: advantages and limitations: Part I. C–S–H, C–A–S–H and other products formed in different binding mixtures. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 142, 371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abdel Rahim Mohammed Abdel Rahim Ahmed, B. & Mahjoub Osman Mahjoub, S. (2001). The Effect of Admixtures on Concrete Properties.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Patel, N., Dave, R., Modi, S., Joshi, C., Vora, S., & Solanki, M. (2016). Effect of binary and quaternary blends on compressive strength. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 7, 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Akinpelu, M. A., Odeyemi, S. O., Olafusi, O. S., & Muhammed, F. Z. (2019). Evaluation of splitting tensile and compressive strength relationship of self-compacting concrete. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 31, 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalyani, V. N., Krishna, K. H., Gunnepalli, C., Pradesh, A., & Sai, A. N. A Comparitative Study of Compressive Strength and Split Tensile Strength on Effect of Size of Coarse Aggregate in Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete with Different Grades. www.ijert.org.

  26. Rithuparna, R., Jittin, V., & Bahurudeen, A. (2021). Influence of different processing methods on the recycling potential of agro-waste ashes for sustainable cement production: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. D. Kumara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumara, G.D., Sai Kumar, V., Sivapullaiah, P.V., Sreenivasa Murthy, A. (2023). Evaluation of Self Compacting Concrete with Fiber and Bagasse Ash. In: Vilventhan, A., Singh, S.B., Delhi, V.S.K. (eds) Advances in Construction Materials and Management. ACMM 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 346. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2552-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2552-0_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2551-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2552-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics