Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of current concepts in etiopathogenesis, molecular alterations and diagnostic and reporting guidelines in prostatic carcinoma which is the second most common cancer in men. Acinar adenocarcinoma has been detailed with respect to its subtypes, grading and staging. Emphasis has been given on descriptions of Gleason score and group grades which form an important prognostic parameter in acinar adenocarcinoma. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal carcinoma of prostate need to be recognized as separate entities owing to therapeutic and prognostic implications. Neuroendocrine tumours of the prostate represent a considerable chunk of prostatic tumours, and their full spectrum has been outlined in detail. Evolving and established genomic markers have a role in genetic risk assessment, prognostication and providing therapeutic options in prostate cancer patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
Smith SC. General concepts, prostate carcinoma. In: Amin MB, Tickoo SK, editors. Diagnostic pathology: genitourinary. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Elsevier; 2016. p. 600–7.
Kench JG, Kristiansen G, Berney DM, et al. Acinar adenocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, editor. Urinary and male genital tumours, WHO classification of tumours series, vol. 8. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022.
Andreoiu M, Cheng L. Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Hum Pathol. 2010;41(6):781–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2010.02.011.
Rosoff JS, Prasad SM, Savage SJ. Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1353–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1080-9.
Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(2):244–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
van Leenders GJLH, van der Kwast TH, Grignon DJ, Evans AJ, Kristiansen G, Kweldam CF, Litjens G, McKenney JK, Melamed J, Mottet N, Paner GP, Samaratunga H, Schoots IG, Simko JP, Tsuzuki T, Varma M, Warren AY, Wheeler TM, Williamson SR, Iczkowski KA, ISUP Grading Workshop Panel Members. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(8):e87–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001497.
Epstein JI, Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):820–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00337-X.
Al-Ahmadie H. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. In: Amin MB, Tickoo SK, editors. Diagnostic pathology: genitourinary. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Elsevier; 2016. p. 590–9.
Netto GJ, Humphrey PA, Galluzzi CM. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, editor. Urinary and male genital tumours, WHO classification of tumours series, vol. 8. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022.
Singh PB, Nicholson CM, Ragavan N, Blades RA, Martin FL, Matanhelia SS. Risk of prostate cancer after detection of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on extended core needle biopsy: a UK hospital experience. BMC Urol. 2009;9:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-9-3.
Guo CC, Epstein JI. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significance. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:1528–35.
Epstein JI, Oxley J, Ro JY, Van der Kwast T, Zhou M. lntraductal carcinoma. In: Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs, 2016. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016.
Wobker SE, Epstein JI. Differential diagnosis of Intraductal lesions of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(6):e67–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000609.
Porter LH, Lawrence MG, Ilic D, Clouston D, Bolton DM, Frydenberg M, Murphy DG, Pezaro C, Risbridger GP, Taylor RA. Systematic review links the prevalence of Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate to prostate cancer risk categories. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):492–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.013.
Kwast THVD, Kristiansen G, McKenney JK. Ductal adenocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, editor. Urinary and male genital tumours, WHO classification of tumours series, vol. 8. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022.
Rubin MA. Treatment-related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, editor. Urinary and male genital tumours, WHO classification of tumours series, vol. 8. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022.
Klein EA, Kupelian PA, Witte JS. Does a family history of prostate cancer result in more aggressive disease? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1998;16:297–300.
Dias A, Kote-Jarai Z, Mikropoulos C, Eeles R. Prostate cancer Germline variations and implications for screening and treatment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(9):a030379. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a030379.
Gronberg H, Isaacs SD, Smith JR, Carpten JD, Bova GS, Freije D, Xu J, et al. Characteristics of prostate cancer in families potentially linked to the hereditary prostate cancer 1 (HPC1) locus. JAMA. 1997;27815:1251–5.
Ni Raghallaigh H, Eeles R. Genetic predisposition to prostate cancer: an update. Familial Cancer. 2022;21:101–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-021-00227-3.
Zheng SL, Sun J, Wiklund F, Smith S, Stattin P, Li G, Adami HO, et al. Cumulative association of five genetic variants with prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;3589:910–9.
Zafeiriou Z, Bianchini D, Chandler R, Rescigno P, Yuan W, Carreira S, Barrero M, et al. Genomic analysis of three metastatic prostate cancer patients with exceptional responses to carboplatin indicating different types of DNA repair deficiency. Eur Urol. 2019;751:184–92.
Nicolosi P, Ledet E, Yang S, Michalski S, Freschi B, O’Leary E, Esplin ED, et al. Prevalence of germline variants in prostate cancer and implications for current genetic testing guidelines. JAMA Oncol. 2019;54:523–8.
Giri VN, Knudsen KE, Kelly WK, Cheng HH, Cooney KA, Cookson MS, Dahut W, et al. Implementation of germline testing for prostate cancer: Philadelphia prostate cancer consensus conference 2019. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2798–811.
Cucchiara V, Cooperberg MR, Dall’Era M, et al. Genomic markers in prostate cancer decision making. Eur Urol. 2018;73(4):572–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.036.
Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, et al. DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1697–708.
Antonarakis ES, Lu C, Wang H, Luber B, Nakazawa M, Roeser JC, Chen Y, Mohammad TA, Chen Y, Fedor HL, Lotan TL, Zheng Q, De Marzo AM, Isaacs JT, Isaacs WB, Nadal R, Paller CJ, Denmeade SR, Carducci MA, Eisenberger MA, Luo J. AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):1028–38. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1315815.
Hempelmann JA, Lockwood CM, Konnick EQ, et al. Microsatellite instability in prostate cancer by PCR or next-generation sequencing. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0341-y.
Lotan TL, Tomlins SA, Bismar TA, Van der Kwast TH, Grignon D, Egevad L, Kristiansen G, Pritchard CC, Rubin MA, Bubendorf L. Report from the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consultation conference on molecular pathology of urogenital cancers. I. Molecular biomarkers in prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(7):e15–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001450.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Meenakshi Kamboj, Dr. Divya Bansal and Dr. Ankur Kumar for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Declaration
The authors declare that no funds, grants or other supports were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suryavanshi, M., Durga, G. (2023). Pathology and Staging. In: Singh, P., Nayak, B., Panaiyadiyan, S. (eds) A Guide to Management of Urological Cancers. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2341-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2341-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2340-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2341-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)