The paper presents an experimental digital form-finding method demonstrated on a tensegrity pavilion design. The creation process is driven by biological inspiration, relating the architectural design to the natural organism’s adaptation to its surroundings. In the Grasshopper parametric environment, we interrelate weather data, expressed through one Forming Force, with the process of form-finding. Employing Python scripts, the topological, structural, and geometric relations of the emerging 3D geometry are transformed under the influence of the weather. In an iterating loop, the tensegrity-like units gradually duplicate (grow), creating the ‘Weather Pavilion’. Through receiving environmental information, a weather-responsive structure simultaneously emerges. The resulting architectural form integrates the influence of the meteorological data and converts it to the optimal reaction to the specific microclimate. On a case study pavilion in Košice, the weather-driven design method is demonstrated, which (1) aims at improving climate-collaborative, sustainable building design in the future, (2) blends the Grasshopper-integrated techniques: form-finding employing a new plug-in Anisoptera (which integrates the weather information to the design process), and structural analysis through Karamba 3D, with architectural design.
- Python scripting
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
This Python-based script is employed in the form-finding process in Grasshopper and developed by the authors.
Abdelmohsen, S., Massoud, P., & Elshafei, A. (2016). Using tensegrity and folding to generate soft responsive architectural skins. In Complexity and Simplicity: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (pp. 529–536). University of Oulu.
Barozzi, M., Lienhard, J., Zanelli, A., et al. (2016). The sustainability of adaptive envelopes: Developments of kinetic architecture. Procedia Engineering, 155, 275–284.
Beesley, P., & Omar, K. (2009). Responsive architecture/performing instruments. The Architectural League of New York.
Duering, S., Chronis, A., & Koenig, R. (2020). Optimizing urban systems : Integrated optimization of spatial configurations. In: SimAUD: Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design (pp. 503–510).
Erhan, H., Wang, I., & Shireen, N. (2014). Interacting with thousands: A parametric-space exploration method in generative design. In: ACADIA 2014: Design Agency (pp. 619–625).
Eurocode 1. (2010). Actions on structures, Part 1–4: General actions. Wind actions. Brussels.
Funes, P., & Pollack, J. (1999). Computer evolution of buildable objects for evolutionary design by computers. Evolutionary Design by Computers, 1999, 387–403.
Hu, Y., & Li. Q. (2014). Study on an architect-oriented approach of structural performance-based design. In SIGgraDi 2014: Design in freedom (pp. 111–114). Blucher Design Proceedings.
Jun, J. W., Silverio, M., Llubia, J. A., et al. (2017). Remembrane. In CAAD Futures 17 (pp. 180–198).
Kabošová, L., Foged, I., Kmeť, S., et al. (2019). Hybrid design method for wind-adaptive architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 17, 1–16.
Kontovourkis, O., Phocas, M. C., Alexandrou, K. C., et al. (2017). Configuration and deformation control of a hybrid cable bending-active structure. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 5, 475–483.
Körner, A., Born, L., Mader, A., et al. (2018). Flectofold—a biomimetic compliant shading device for complex free form facades. Smart Materials and Structures, 27. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa9c2f
Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2010). Climate adaptive building shells: state of the art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483–493.
De Luca, F., Dogan, T., & Sepúlveda, A. (2021). Reverse solar envelope method. A new building form-finding method that can take regulatory frameworks into account. Automation in Construction, 123, 103518.
Malkawi, A. M., Srinivasan, R. S., Yi, Y. K., et al. (2005). Decision support and design evolution: Integrating genetic algorithms, CFD and Visualization. Automation in Construction, 14, 33–44.
Meagher, M. (2015). Designing for change: The poetic potential of responsive architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4, 159–165.
Motro, R. (2003). Tensegrity: Structural systems for the future (1st ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Natanian, J., Aleksandrowicz, O., & Auer, T. (2019). A parametric approach to optimizing urban form, energy balance and environmental quality: The case of Mediterranean districts. Applied Energy, 254, 113637.
Orhon, A. V. (2016). Adaptive building shells. In Efe, R., Matchavariani, L., Yaldır, A., et al. (Eds.), Developments in Science and Engineering (pp. 555–567). St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
Pellitteri, G., Lattuca, R., Concialdi, S., et al. (2009). Architectural shape generating through environmental forces. In Joining Languages, Cultures and Visions: Proceedings of the 13th International CAAD Futures Conference (pp. 875–886). Les Presses de Université de Montréal.
Peña, D. M., Llorens, I., & Sastre, R. (2010). Application of the tensegrity principles on tensile textile constructions. International Journal of Space Structures, 25, 57–67.
Persiani, S., Battisti, A., Persiani, S. G. L., et al. (2016). Autoreactive architectural facades-discussing unpowered kinetic building skins and the method of evolutionary optimization. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Adaptive Building Skins, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309285459
Schleicher, S., Lienhard, J., Poppinga, S., et al. (2015). A methodology for transferring principles of plant movements to elastic systems in architecture. CAD Computer Aided Design, 60, 105–117.
Senatore, G., Duffour, P., & Winslow, P. (2018). Exploring the application domain of adaptive structures. Engineering Structures, 167, 608–628.
Spisak, M., & Kmet, S. (2017). Shape and stress modification of a chosen tensegrity system. Procedia Engineering, 190, 637–644.
Tamke, M., Deleuran, A., Gengnagel, C., et al. (2015). Designing CNC knit for hybrid membrane and bending active structures structural membranes 2015. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textile Composites and Inflatable Structures: Structural Membranes 2015 (pp. 281–295).
Vasilkin, A. (2018). The use of methods of structural optimization at the stage of designing high-rise buildings with steel construction. E3S Web Conference, 33. Epub ahead of print 2018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183303078
Veenendaal, D., & Block, P. (2012). An overview and comparison of structural form finding methods for general networks. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49, 3741–3753.
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the following funds: VEGA 1/0626/22, VEGA 1/0129/20, and VEGA 1/0379/19 (Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic).
Editors and Affiliations
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baroš, T., Kabošová, L., Baroš, M., Katunský, D. (2023). Experimental Form-Finding Method. Case Study: ‘Weather Pavilion’. In: Mora, P.L., Viana, D.L., Morais, F., Vieira Vaz, J. (eds) Formal Methods in Architecture. FMA 2022. Digital Innovations in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2217-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2216-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2217-8