Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fornix Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Advances in Ocular Surgery

Part of the book series: Current Practices in Ophthalmology ((CUPROP))

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

Ocular surface reconstruction presents a complex challenge that often requires multiple stages for successful rehabilitation. This chapter explores the crucial role of mucous membrane grafting in the backbone of reconstruction, alongside the prudent utilization of vascular flaps in severe or ischemic cases. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of eyelid-globe reflection for preserving movement, protecting the ocular surface, and facilitating prosthesis placement in anophthalmic cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Solomon A, Espana EM, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for reconstruction of the conjunctival fornices. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):93–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding J, et al. Eyelid and fornix reconstruction in abortive cryptophthalmos: a single-center experience over 12 years. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(11):1576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, Lee SH. Amniotic membrane transplantation for conjunctival surface reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):765–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ucar F, et al. Facilitated tenon-free conjunctival autograft preparation and limited tenon removal technique in pterygium surgery. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2021;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of a large conjunctival autograft for recurrent pterygium. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(6):469–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K. Transplantation of amniotic membrane and limbal autograft for patients with recurrent pterygium associated with symblepharon. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(3):235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Marticorena J, et al. Pterygium surgery: conjunctival autograft using a fibrin adhesive. Cornea. 2006;25(1):34–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh PK, et al. Conjunctival autografting without fibrin glue or sutures for pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2013;32(1):104–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro MS, Friend J, Thoft RA. Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21(1 Pt 1):135–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(5):709–22; discussion 722–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson HWA, Collin JRO. Mucous membrane grafting. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:230–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Osaki TH, et al. Management of severe cicatricial entropion with labial mucous membrane graft in cicatricial ocular surface disorders. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(6):1531–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh S, Narang P, Mittal V. Labial mucosa grafting for lid margin, anterior lamellar, and posterior lamellar correction in recurrent cicatricial entropion. Orbit. 2021;40(4):301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koreen IV, Taich A, Elner VM. Anterior lamellar recession with buccal mucous membrane grafting for cicatricial entropion. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25(3):180–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. BhalaguruIyyan A, et al. Evaluation of the extent of primary buccal mucosal graft contracture in augmentation Urethroplasty for stricture urethra: a prospective observational study at a tertiary healthcare Centre. Adv Urol. 2021;2021:9913452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lauer G, Schimming R, Frankenschmidt A. Intraoral wound closure with tissue-engineered mucosa: new perspectives for urethra reconstruction with buccal mucosa grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(1):25–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muruganandam K, et al. Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: a prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):72–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood DN, et al. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol. 2004;172(2):580–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Geerling G, Raus P, Murube J. Minor salivary gland transplantation. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:243–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sant’ Anna AE, et al. Minor salivary glands and labial mucous membrane graft in the treatment of severe symblepharon and dry eye in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(2):234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saluja G, Patel BC, Gupta P. Mucous Membrane Graft. In: StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL); 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grixti A, Malhotra R. Oral mucosa grafting in periorbital reconstruction. Orbit. 2018;37(6):411–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neuhaus RW, Baylis HI, Shorr N. Complications at mucous membrane donor sites. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93(5):643–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuckelkorn R, et al. Autologous transplantation of nasal mucosa after severe chemical and thermal eye burns. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74(5):442–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Halama AR, et al. Density of epithelial cells in the normal human nose and the paranasal sinus mucosa. A scanning electron microscopic study. Rhinology. 1990;28(1):25–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wenkel H, Rummelt V, Naumann GO. Long term results after autologous nasal mucosal transplantation in severe mucus deficiency syndromes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(3):279–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross GS, Bell J. Myocardial infarction associated with inappropriate use of topical cocaine as treatment for epistaxis. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10(3):219–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Naumann GO, et al. Autologous nasal mucosa transplantation in severe bilateral conjunctival mucus deficiency syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(8):1011–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Suh JD, Ramakrishnan VR, DeConde AS. Nasal floor free mucosal graft for skull base reconstruction and cerebrospinal fluid leak repair. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(2):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinberg DA, et al. Eyelid mucous membrane grafts: a histologic study of hard palate, nasal turbinate, and buccal mucosal grafts. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(3):211–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee AC, et al. Socket reconstruction with combined mucous membrane and hard palate mucosal grafts. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33(6):463–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beatty RL, et al. Intraoral palatal mucosal graft harvest. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9(2):120–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldberg RA, et al. Management of severe cicatricial entropion using shared mucosal grafts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(9):1255–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen MS, Shorr N. Eyelid reconstruction with hard palate mucosa grafts. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8(3):183–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim JW, Kikkawa DO, Lemke BN. Donor site complications of hard palate mucosal grafting. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;13(1):36–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmitzer S, et al. The Anophthalmic socket—reconstruction options. J Med Life. 2014;7 Spec No. 4:23–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Korn BS, et al. Treatment of lower eyelid malposition with dermis fat grafting. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):744–751 e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhattacharjee K, et al. Comparative analysis of use of porous orbital implant with mucus membrane graft and dermis fat graft as a primary procedure in reconstruction of severely contracted socket. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(2):145–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Inchingolo F, et al. Use of dermal-fat grafts in the post-oncological reconstructive surgery of atrophies in the zygomatic region: clinical evaluations in the patients undergone to previous radiation therapy. Head Face Med. 2012;8:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gupta H, et al. Dermis fat graft for pediatric exenteration-challenging but rewarding. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(3):169–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jovanovic N, et al. Reconstruction of the orbit and Anophthalmic socket using the dermis fat graft: a major review. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;36(6):529–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leaf N, Zarem HA. Correction of contour defects of the face with dermal and dermal-fat grafts. Arch Surg. 1972;105(5):715–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Davis RE, Guida RA, Cook TA. Autologous free dermal fat graft. Reconstruction of facial contour defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(1):95–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bonavolonta G, et al. Orbital dermis-fat graft using periumbilical tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):23–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shore JW, et al. Management of complications following dermis-fat grafting for anophthalmic socket reconstruction. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(10):1342–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Quaranta-Leoni FM, et al. Dermis-fat graft in children as primary and secondary orbital implant. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;32(3):214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Collar RM, et al. The versatility of the temporoparietal fascia flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(2):141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wormald PJ, Alun-Jones T. Anatomy of the temporalis fascia. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105(7):522–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hashmi A, et al. Safe zone for dissection in frontotemporal region to avoid injury to the temporal branch of facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(7):2322–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ellis DS, Toth BA, Stewart WB. Temporoparietal fascial flap for orbital and eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(4):606–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sahin I, et al. Total lower eyelid reconstruction with superficial temporal fascia flap and porous polyethylene implant: a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(1):110–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rootman DB, et al. Ocular surface, fornix, and eyelid rehabilitation in Boston type I keratoprosthesis patients with mucous membrane disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31(1):43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koizumi N, et al. Comparison of intact and denuded amniotic membrane as a substrate for cell-suspension culture of human limbal epithelial cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(1):123–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fernandes M, et al. Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Cornea. 2005;24(6):643–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee HS, Kim JC. Effect of amniotic fluid in corneal sensitivity and nerve regeneration after excimer laser ablation. Cornea. 1996;15(5):517–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bajaj MS, et al. Evaluation of amniotic membrane grafting in the reconstruction of contracted socket. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(2):116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dua HS, Maharajan VS, Hopkinson A. Controversies and limitations of amniotic membrane in ophthalmic surgery. In: Reinhard T, Larkin DFP, editors. Cornea and external eye disease. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2006. p. 21–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Hao Y, et al. Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea. 2000;19(3):348–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shanbhag SS, Chodosh J, Saeed HN. Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation with cyanoacrylate glue for acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(3):560–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Neuhaus RW, Hawes MJ. Inadequate inferior cul-de-sac in the anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(1):153–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Demirci H, Elner SG, Elner VM. Rigid nylon foil-anchored polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) sheet stenting for conjunctival fornix reconstruction. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(9):1736–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Putterman AM, Scott R. Deep ocular socket reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(7):1221–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lama PJ, Fechtner RD. Antifibrotics and wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48(3):314–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Khaw PT, et al. Five-minute treatments with fluorouracil, floxuridine, and mitomycin have long-term effects on human Tenon's capsule fibroblasts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(8):1150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Priel A, et al. Use of antimetabolites in the reconstruction of severe anophthalmic socket contraction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28(6):409–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tawfik HA, et al. Revisiting the role of the myofibroblast in socket surgery: an Immunohistochemical study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;32(4):292–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kamal S, et al. Serial sub-conjunctival 5-fluorouracil for early recurrent anophthalmic contracted socket. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(12):2797–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mattout HK, Fouda SM, Al-Nashar HY. Evaluation of topical mitomycin-C eye drops after reconstructive surgery for anophthalmic contracted socket. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4621–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Pallavi Singh & Daniel B. Rootman

Authors
  1. Pallavi Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel B. Rootman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Edmund Tsui

  2. Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Simon S. M. Fung

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Rohan Bir Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, P., Rootman, D.B. (2023). Fornix Reconstruction. In: Tsui, E., Fung, S.S.M., Singh, R.B. (eds) Current Advances in Ocular Surgery. Current Practices in Ophthalmology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1661-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1661-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1660-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1661-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation