Skip to main content
  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

With the development of spinal endoscopic surgery, cervical decompression and discectomy has become the major endoscopic cervical spine surgery. The lack of clear anatomical landmarks and hindered visualization of anatomical structures due to narrow operating view are significant limitations in the endoscopic approach to the spine. Complications during the learning curve period of endoscopic spine surgery usually occur due to unfamiliarity with endoscopic image orientation and inappropriate approach to the surgical target. This can result in injury to neural structures, incomplete decompression, dural tear, wrong-level procedures, and excessive removal of facet joint in the initial series of patients. The learning curve is steep because endoscopic drilling is performed close to neural structures. To avoid complications associated with endoscopic spine surgery, various factors should be considered. The important step for obtaining a good surgical outcome after endoscopic spine surgery is an ideal entry point and trajectory during the surgical approach. To prevent insufficient decompression, the widest decompression as possible is often required. However, excessive facet joint removal and surgically induced instability could lead to persistent symptoms, recurrent disc herniation, and progressive neck pain. Prevention of postoperative dysesthesia is also an important factor for successful cervical endoscopic decompression. The surgeon is responsible for optimal outcomes, which could affect the frequency and severity of adverse events. Endoscopic cervical spine surgery should be performed carefully using an appropriate surgical technique with sufficient experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical and radiographic changes after percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a long-term follow-up. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(12):663–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. A new full-endoscopic technique for cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 87 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50(4):219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein NE. A review of complication rates for anterior cervical Diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maharaj MM, Mobbs RJ, Hogan J, Zhao DF, Rao PJ, Phan K. Anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):72–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubelski D, Healy AT, Silverstein MP, Abdullah KG, Thompson NR, Riew KD, et al. Reoperation rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy: a propensity-matched analysis. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1277–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi D, Petrik V, Fox S, Parkinson J, Timothy J, Gullan R. Motion preservation and clinical outcome of porous coated motion cervical disk arthroplasty. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(1):30–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(9):940–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Won S, Kim CH, Chung CK, Choi Y, Park SB, Moon JH, et al. Comparison of cervical sagittal alignment and kinematics after posterior full-endoscopic cervical Foraminotomy and discectomy according to preoperative cervical alignment. Pain Physician. 2017;20(2):77–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim HS, Wu PH, Lee YJ, Kim DH, Kim JY, Lee JH, et al. Safe route for cervical approach: partial Pediculotomy, partial Vertebrotomy approach for posterior endoscopic cervical Foraminotomy and discectomy. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:e273–e82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bucknall V, Gibson JA. Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: a review of the current literature. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26(1):2309499018758520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Komp M, Oezdemir S, Hahn P, Ruetten S. Full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy surgery for cervical disc herniations. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2018;30(1):13–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park Jae H, Jun SG, Jung Je T, Lee SJ. Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical Foraminotomy and Diskectomy with unilateral Biportal endoscopy. Orthopedics. 2017;40(5):e779–e83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song KS, Lee CW. The Biportal endoscopic posterior cervical inclinatory Foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: technical report and preliminary results. Neurospine. 2020;17(Suppl 1):S145–s53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sclafani JA, Kim CW. Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(6):1711–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McAnany SJ, Kim JS, Overley SC, Baird EO, Anderson PA, Qureshi SA. A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy: open versus minimally-invasive techniques. Spine J. 2015;15(5):849–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S-H, Lee JH, Choi W-C, Jung B, Mehta R. Anterior minimally invasive approaches for the cervical spine. Orthop Clin N Am. 2007;38(3):327–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn Y. Endoscopic spine discectomy: indications and outcomes. Int Orthop. 2019;43(4):909–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haviarová Z, Matejčík V, Kuruc R, Halgaš F. Extradural and intradural characteristics of the cervical nerve root anomalies. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;73:259–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HS, Raorane HD, Wu PH, Heo DH, Sharma SB, Jang IT. Incidental Durotomy during endoscopic stenosis lumbar decompression: incidence, classification, and proposed management strategies. World Neurosurg. 2020;139:e13–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim J-E, Choi D-J, Park EJ. Risk factors and options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal endoscopic spine surgery. Asian Spine J. 2020;14(6):790–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jonas R, Demmelmaier R, Wilke HJ. Influences of functional structures on the kinematic behavior of the cervical spine. Spine J. 2020;20(12):2014–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Yoon Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Because dural tears mainly occur during dissection of the root, sufficient medial pediculectomy is performed to secure sufficient space. If adhesion is present, it should be peeled off (from 21 to 30 s). If a dural tear occurs, it should be covered with the patch-blocking repair technique or gluing for small incidental tears (from 42 to 47 s) (MP4 60201 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, H.S., Park, J.Y. (2023). Prevention of Complications. In: Kim, H.S., Heo, D.H., Lim, K., Park, C.W., Park, CK. (eds) Advanced Technique of Endoscopic Cervical and Thoracic Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1133-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1133-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1132-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1133-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics