Skip to main content

Supply Chain Data Analytics for Predicting Delivery Risks Using Machine Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Emerging Technologies and AI/ML Algorithms (ICDAPS 2022)

Part of the book series: Asset Analytics ((ASAN))

  • 368 Accesses

Abstract

The most difficult predictive challenge in supply chain disruption management is order delivery delay. Identifying the risk in delivering an order in the scheduled time will help the company to focus on the prioritized orders to mitigate the disruption before its occurrence. This research presents a machine learning-based predictive model for delivery risk prediction of different product orders. The proposed approach deals with an imbalanced class problem, where the frequency of orders which have the delivery risk is rare when compared to the orders that do not. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) score is the selected performance metric for the proposed risk prediction problem. With a comparative analysis, it is found that the Random Forest model in Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) with the Tomek link gives a better performance with an AUC score of 0.80. It is also found that the Random Forest model performs better in SMOTE and SMOTE Tomek oversampling methods, whereas K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) performs well in the random oversampling technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MacKenzie CA, Barker K, Santos JR (2014) Modelling a severe supply chain disruption and post-disaster decision making with application to the Japanese earthquake and Tsunami. IIE Trans 46:1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817x.2013.876241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Katsaliaki K, Galetsi P, Kumar S (2021) Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03912-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kusrini E et al (2020) Risk mitigation on product distribution and delay delivery: a case study in an Indonesian manufacturing company. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 722, pp 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/722/1/012015

  4. Wang G, Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT et al (2016) Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: certain investigations for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ 176:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baryannis G, Validi S, Dani S et al (2018) Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions. Int J Prod Res 57:2179–2202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dani S (2009) Predicting and managing supply chain risks. In: Supply chain risk. Springer, Boston, pp 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Santis RB et al (2017) Predicting material backorders in inventory management using machine learning. In: IEEE Latin American conference on computational intelligence (LA-CCI). https://doi.org/10.1109/la-cci.2017.8285684

  8. Shajalal M, Hajek P, Abedin MZ (2021) Product backorder prediction using deep neural network on imbalanced data. Int J Prod Res 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1901153

  9. Brintrup A, Pak J, Ratiney D et al (2019) Supply chain data analytics for predicting supplier disruptions: a case study in complex asset manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 58:3330–3341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1685705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh S, Kumar R, Panchal R et al (2020) Impact of covid-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain. Int J Prod Res 59:1993–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1792000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. López V, Fernández A, García S et al (2013) An insight into classification with imbalanced data: empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics. J Inf Sci 250:113–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galar M, Fernandez A, Barrenechea E et al (2012) A review on ensembles for the class imbalance problem: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based approaches. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 42:463–484. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2161285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO et al (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay V. Panicker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thomas, A., Panicker, V.V. (2023). Supply Chain Data Analytics for Predicting Delivery Risks Using Machine Learning. In: Tiwari, M.K., Kumar, M.R., T. M., R., Mitra, R. (eds) Applications of Emerging Technologies and AI/ML Algorithms. ICDAPS 2022. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1019-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics