Skip to main content
  • 296 Accesses

Abstract

The review of research on attrition commences with research on face-to-face teaching. Early research on entry characteristics and their relationship to attrition was discredited, as it was found that such variables predicted little of the variance in retention and success. Instead, research concentrated on developing models which took into account what occurred during the course of study. The most highly cited is the model of Tinto, which posited that retention was promoted through students becoming socially and academically integrated with the college community, through student–student and student–teacher interaction on-campus. It has been found difficult to translate this influential research into the context of online teaching, as it lacks the direct student–student and student–teacher contact which provides the integrative mechanism. The chapter concludes by reviewing research into virtual communities in online learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2020). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edition). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. SAGE Open, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon. (2009). MISSING.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, T. V., & Brindle, K. A. (2017). Identifying facilitating factors and barriers to improving student retention rates in tertiary teaching courses: A systematic review. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(5), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1264927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, C. (2014). Developing a model and applications for probabilities of student success: A case study of predictive analytics. Open Learning: THe Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.931805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D., Ng, E., & Birch, D. (2009). Retention and progression of postgraduate business students: An Australian perspective. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. D., Campbell, S. M., Baker, H. M., & Leeds, E. M. (2014). The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., & Matzat, U. (2017). Predicting student performance from LMS data: A comparison of 17 blended courses using Moodle LMS. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2616312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delnoij, L. E. C., Dirkx, K. J. H., Janssen, J. P. W., & Martens, R. L. (2020). Predicting and resolving non-completion in higher (online) education—A literature review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1951). In J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, (Trans.), Suicide. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, C., & Tinto, V. (2008). Access without support is not opportunity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.46-50

  • Fan, S., Chen, L., Nair, M., Garg, S., Yeom, S., Kregor, G., & Wang, Y. (2021). Revealing impact factors on student engagement: Learning analytics adoption in online and blended courses in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(10), 608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S., Murray, K., & Frazer, N. A. (1985). Homesickness, health and efficiency in first year students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(2), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HESP, (2017). Improving retention, completion and success in higher education, higher education standards panel discussion paper (Canberra: Australian Government).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. J., Lanig, H., & Vaughan, W. (2007). Educating for equity and social justice: A conceptual model for cultural engagement. Multicultural Perspectives, 9(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., Cheung, W., & S. (2012). Student participation in online discussions: Challenges, solutions, and future research. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Krause, K.-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Leung, D., & Prosser, M. (2019). Has the open door become a revolving door? The impact on attrition of moving from elite to mass higher education? Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1629411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1989). A longitudinal-process model of drop-out from distance education. The Journal of Higher Education, 60(3), 278–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1995). Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress. Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 593–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers and Education, 48(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904271199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G. (1973). Towards a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(9), 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muljana, P. S., & Luo, T (2019). Factors contributing to student retention in online learning and recommended strategies for improvement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology. digitalcommons.odu.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. The Journal of Higher Education, 51(1), 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T. (Ed.) (1982). Studying student attrition. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G. (1988). Different worlds in the same classroom. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: New perspectives. Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, A., & Lykkegaard, E. (2022). Study environment factors associated with retention in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 7(1), 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, O. (2013). Supporting students for success in online and distance education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2, 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: A Socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2012). Enhancing student success: Taking the classroom success seriously. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. 1521025115621917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. (HEA Report 11) Retrieved from The Higher Education academy website: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf

  • Van Gennep, A. (1960). In M. Vizedom & G. Caffee (Trans.), The rites of passage. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kember, D., Fan, S. (2023). Review of Literature on Attrition. In: Kember, D., Ellis, R.A., Fan, S., Trimble, A. (eds) Adapting to Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0898-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0898-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0897-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0898-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics