Abstract
Retention and success in online learning has been handicapped by the absence of on-campus student–student or teacher–student contacts, which are the established mechanisms for promoting social and academic integration. This chapter proposes a model with which online teachers can promote the development of virtual learning communities, characterised by social and academic integration elements. The model proposes that a supportive online environment would be promoted if there were four elements of high quality online pedagogy present: bite-sized videos of interest and relevance; learning materials that are well organised and provide a clear learning roadmap; discussion forums that are set up and moderated so as to result in lively student–student and student–teacher interaction; and; online teachers being approachable and responsive to communication with individual students through email, phone and online communication platforms. The model proposes a causal link between the online supporting environment and the formation of virtual learning communities, with elements of both social and academic integration. The model was tested with structural equation modelling (SEM), which showed a very good fit to the data. Data for testing the SEM model were collected with a questionnaire with measures for the four pedagogical elements of the model and the formation of learning communities. The elements of the model were then briefly illustrated and substantiated with data from interviews with sutudents. This research is of significance as it establishes a mechanism by which online teachers can promote virtual learning communities, leading to social and academic integration, without the need for direct on-campus contact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2020). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622–634.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Brindley, J. E. (2014). Learner support in online distance education: Essential and evolving. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Anderson (Eds.),Online distance education: Towards a research agenda (pp. 287–310). Athabasca University Press.
Cain, D. L., Marrara, C., Pitre, P. E., & Armour, S. (2007). Support services that matter: An exploration of the experiences and needs of graduate students in a distance learning environment. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 18(1), 42–56.
Chou, C., Bentler, P., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A monte carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44(2), 347–357.
Dare, L. A., Zapata, L. P., & Thomas, A. G. (2005). Assessing the needs of distance learners: A student affairs perspective. New Directions for Student Services, 2005(112), 39–54.
Engstrom, C., & Tinto, V. (2008). Access without support is not opportunity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.46-50
Forrester, G., Motteram, G., Parkinson, G., & Slaouti, D. (2005). Going the distance: Students’ experiences of induction to distance learning in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(4), 293–306.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in on-line discussions. Springer.
James, R., Krause, K.-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
Kelly, A. F., & Mulrooney, H. M. (2019). Student perceptions of belonging at university: A qualitative perspective. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, (14).
Kember, D., & Ginns, P. (2012). Evaluating teaching and learning: A practical handbook for colleges, universities and the scholarship of teaching. Routledge.
Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 249–263.
Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2008). Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 341–353.
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.
Lentell, H. (2003). The importance of the tutor in open and distance learning. In R. Mills & A. Tait (Eds.), Rethinking learner support in distance education: Change and continuity in an international context (pp. 64–76). Routledge.
Mason, R. (2003). Online and supporting students: New possibilities. In R. Mills & A. Tait (Eds.), Rethinking learner support in distance education: Change and continuity in an international context (pp. 90–101). Routledge.
MacCallum, R., Browne, M., & Sugawara, H. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.
Owens, J., Hardcastle, L., & Richardson, B. (2009). Learning from a distance: The experience of remote students. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 53–74.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. StataCorpLLC
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college. University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (2012). Enhancing student success: Taking the classroom success seriously. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(1), 1–8.
Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review (HEA Report 11). Retrieved from The Higher Education academy website: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf
Acknowledgements
Copyright in the Online Learning Support questionnaire is owned by David Hicks and David Kember (© David Hicks and David Kember, 2022). Readers are encouraged to make use of the questionnaire for purposes of research and the evaluation of teaching and learning, provided that due acknowledgement is made and this chapter in the book is cited in any resulting publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kember, D., Hicks, D. (2023). Modelling the Way Teachers Can Support the Retention and Success of Online Students. In: Kember, D., Ellis, R.A., Fan, S., Trimble, A. (eds) Adapting to Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0898-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0898-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0897-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0898-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)