Skip to main content

Modelling the Way Teachers Can Support the Retention and Success of Online Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adapting to Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education

Abstract

Retention and success in online learning has been handicapped by the absence of on-campus student–student or teacher–student contacts, which are the established mechanisms for promoting social and academic integration. This chapter proposes a model with which online teachers can promote the development of virtual learning communities, characterised by social and academic integration elements. The model proposes that a supportive online environment would be promoted if there were four elements of high quality online pedagogy present: bite-sized videos of interest and relevance; learning materials that are well organised and provide a clear learning roadmap; discussion forums that are set up and moderated so as to result in lively student–student and student–teacher interaction; and; online teachers being approachable and responsive to communication with individual students through email, phone and online communication platforms. The model proposes a causal link between the online supporting environment and the formation of virtual learning communities, with elements of both social and academic integration. The model was tested with structural equation modelling (SEM), which showed a very good fit to the data. Data for testing the SEM model were collected with a questionnaire with measures for the four pedagogical elements of the model and the formation of learning communities. The elements of the model were then briefly illustrated and substantiated with data from interviews with sutudents. This research is of significance as it establishes a mechanism by which online teachers can promote virtual learning communities, leading to social and academic integration, without the need for direct on-campus contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2020). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, J. E. (2014). Learner support in online distance education: Essential and evolving. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Anderson (Eds.),Online distance education: Towards a research agenda (pp. 287–310). Athabasca University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, D. L., Marrara, C., Pitre, P. E., & Armour, S. (2007). Support services that matter: An exploration of the experiences and needs of graduate students in a distance learning environment. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 18(1), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., Bentler, P., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A monte carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44(2), 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dare, L. A., Zapata, L. P., & Thomas, A. G. (2005). Assessing the needs of distance learners: A student affairs perspective. New Directions for Student Services, 2005(112), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, C., & Tinto, V. (2008). Access without support is not opportunity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.46-50

  • Forrester, G., Motteram, G., Parkinson, G., & Slaouti, D. (2005). Going the distance: Students’ experiences of induction to distance learning in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(4), 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2012). Student participation in on-line discussions. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Krause, K.-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. F., & Mulrooney, H. M. (2019). Student perceptions of belonging at university: A qualitative perspective. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, (14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Ginns, P. (2012). Evaluating teaching and learning: A practical handbook for colleges, universities and the scholarship of teaching. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2008). Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentell, H. (2003). The importance of the tutor in open and distance learning. In R. Mills & A. Tait (Eds.), Rethinking learner support in distance education: Change and continuity in an international context (pp. 64–76). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (2003). Online and supporting students: New possibilities. In R. Mills & A. Tait (Eds.), Rethinking learner support in distance education: Change and continuity in an international context (pp. 90–101). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R., Browne, M., & Sugawara, H. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J., Hardcastle, L., & Richardson, B. (2009). Learning from a distance: The experience of remote students. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. StataCorpLLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2012). Enhancing student success: Taking the classroom success seriously. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917

  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review (HEA Report 11). Retrieved from The Higher Education academy website: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

Copyright in the Online Learning Support questionnaire is owned by David Hicks and David Kember (© David Hicks and David Kember, 2022). Readers are encouraged to make use of the questionnaire for purposes of research and the evaluation of teaching and learning, provided that due acknowledgement is made and this chapter in the book is cited in any resulting publications.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hicks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kember, D., Hicks, D. (2023). Modelling the Way Teachers Can Support the Retention and Success of Online Students. In: Kember, D., Ellis, R.A., Fan, S., Trimble, A. (eds) Adapting to Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0898-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0898-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0897-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0898-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics