Skip to main content

Iranian EFL Teachers’ Challenges and Solutions in Using Computer-Assisted Assessment: Exploring EFL Teachers’ Experiential Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examined the Iranian EFL teachers’ challenges with computer-assisted assessment (CAA) and their solutions to such challenges. Through a transcendental phenomenology, we attempted to investigate EFL teachers’ experiential evidence to find the essence of the phenomenon—the challenges and solutions of CAA—from their voices. Hence, we collected autobiographical narratives of four Iranian EFL teachers and analyzed them based on Giori’s five-step framework. The findings showed that EFL teachers’ main challenges in integrating CAA into their classes were the lack of required infrastructures and teachers’ low technological literacy. The findings also indicated that teachers’ main solutions were alternative assessment to CAA, CALL teacher education, developing infrastructures, new identifications of technology, and students’ technological literacy. By analyzing their experiences critically, we found that they cannot distinguish between pedagogical and institutional infrastructures, which could be the origin of many of their challenges. Moreover, concerning their solutions, we found that the accountability of their solutions is not the same in the Iranian context. Finally, we conclude that EFL teacher education programs in general and CALL teacher education programs in particular need to change EFL teachers’ identifications about the concept of infrastructures and simultaneously develop teachers’ technological literacy and autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D., & McAusland, W. D. M. (2002). Computer assisted assessment. Retrieved from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/printable/caa_v5.pdf

  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debuse, J. C., Lawley, M., & Shibl, R. (2008). Educators’ perceptions of automated feedback systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology24(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1198

  • Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilay, Y. (2019). Effectiveness of learning management systems in higher education: Views of lecturers with different levels of activity in LMSs. Journal of Online Higher Education, 3(2), 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilay, Y., & Ghilay, R. (2012). Student evaluation in higher education: A comparison between computer assisted assessment and traditional evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gretes, J. A., & Green, M. (2000). Improving undergraduate learning with computer-assisted assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). Teacher education in CALL. John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J., & Musumeci, M. (2017). Integrating assessment with instruction through technology. In C. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology in second language teaching and learning (pp. 293–316). Wiley Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, M. (2012). Perceptions of university students regarding computer assisted assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marandi, S. S. (2019). Preparing for a digital future: CALL teacher education in Iran. In H. Reinders, C. Coombe, A. Littlejohn, & D. Tafazoli (Eds.), Innovation in language learning and teaching: The case of the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 223–240). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markee, N. (2013). Emic and etic in qualitative research. The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 404–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meihami, H. (2021). A narrative inquiry into Iranian EFL teacher educators’ voice about challenges of CALL teacher education. Teaching English with Technology, 21(2), 92–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meihami, H., & Esfandiari, R. (2021). Exploring EFL teachers’ professional identity development in a CALL teacher preparation program. JALT CALL Journal17(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.404

  • Muwanga-Zake, J. (2006). Applications of computer-aided assessment in the diagnosis of science learning and teaching. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 2(4), 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathan, M. M. (2012). Computer assisted language testing [CALT]: Advantages, implications and limitations. Research Vistas, 1(4), 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H. (2009). Technology and second language teacher education. In A. Bums & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 230–237). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen-Phelan, B., & Keegan, B. (2016). Case study on performance and acceptance of computer-aided assessment. International Journal for E-Learning Security, 6(1), 482–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, G., Holifield, P., & Brown, M. (2004). Implementation of computer assisted assessment: lessons from the literature. Research in Learning Technology12(3), 215 229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776042000259546

  • Smorti, A. (2011). Autobiographical memory and autobiographical narrative: What is the relationship? Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21.2.08smo

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell G (ed) (2012) Computer-assisted language learning: diversity in research and practice. Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvorov, R., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Computer-assisted language testing. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 594–613). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi, S., & Rahimi, A. (2015). Computer-assisted assessemnt: Highlights and challenges. Teaching English with Technology, 13(2), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torsani, S. (2016). CALL teacher education: Language teachers and technology integration. Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, J., Barcena, E. & Read, T. (2019). Refugees from MENA learning languages: Progress, principles and proposals. In H. Reinders, C. Coombe, A. Littlejohn, & D. Tafazoli, (Eds.), Innovation in language learning and teaching (pp. 19–38). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative social work. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010368316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture and power in online education. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajab Esfandiari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Esfandiari, R., Meihami, H. (2023). Iranian EFL Teachers’ Challenges and Solutions in Using Computer-Assisted Assessment: Exploring EFL Teachers’ Experiential Evidence. In: Tafazoli, D., Picard, M. (eds) Handbook of CALL Teacher Education and Professional Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0514-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0514-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0513-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0514-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics