Abstract
Over the past couple of decades, screen-film mammography has been replaced by full-field digital mammography (FFDM) improving the mammographic quality. However, sensitivity of mammography is often limited by breast density. Majority of recent advances like the digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and automated breast ultrasound (US) have been developed to either to overcome the limitations in standard mammography or to offer alternative imaging methods to improve detection of early breast cancer. In addition, other advances such as elastography offer better specificity and prehistological characterization of lesions especially when initial imaging findings are equivocal. Advances in image-guided intervention such as vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) helps in better sampling ability or option for lesion excision (VAE), thereby reducing the need for open surgical biopsies. Newer localization methods like radioactive/magnetic seeds and radiofrequency tags have offered flexibility for the breast surgeons, radiologists, and the patient in terms of time frame between the surgery and the localization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
World Health Organization (WHO). Global health estimates 2020: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2019. 2020. Accessed 11 Dec 2020.
Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):909–19.
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, Physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225(1):165–75.
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB. Digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Radiology. 2015;277:663–84.
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D’Orsi C, Karellas A. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. Med Phys. 2007;34(1):221–32.
Roth RG, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation. Radiographics. 2014;34(4):18.
Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Abrams GS, et al. Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(4):450–5.
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(22):2304–10.
Ghaderi KF, et al. Contrast-enhanced mammography: current applications and future directions. Radiographics. 2019;39(7):1907–20.
Patel BK, Naylor ME, Kosiorek HE, et al. Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion. Clin Imaging. 2017;46:44–52.
van Zelst JCM, Man RM. Automated three-dimensional breast US for screening: technique, artifacts, and lesion characterization. Radiographics. 2018;38(3):663–83.
Balleyguier C, Canale S, Ben Hassen W, Vielh P, Bayou EH, Mathieu MC, et al. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(3):427–34.
Balleyguier L, Ciolovan S, Ammari S, Canale S, Sethom S, RAI R, Vielh P, Dromain C. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications, diagnostic and interventional. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(5):503–13. ISSN 2211–5684.
Silverstein MJ, Skinner KA, Lomis TJ. Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:767–77.
Cox K, et al. Validation of a technique using microbubbles and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to biopsy sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in pre-operative breast cancer patients with a normal grey-scale axillary ultrasound. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(7):760–5.
Masud R, Al-Rei M, Lokker. Computer-aided detection for breast cancer screening in clinical settings: scoping review. JMIR Med Inform. 2019;7(3):e12660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gadde, S. (2023). Advances in Breast Imaging and Intervention. In: Dev, B., Joseph, L.D. (eds) Holistic Approach to Breast Disease. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0035-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0035-0_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0034-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0035-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)