Skip to main content

Carcinoma Breast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Holistic Approach to Breast Disease

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women. Screening for breast cancer reduces breast cancer-related mortality, and earlier detection facilitates less aggressive treatment. Invasive breast carcinoma has a wide range of histological appearances. The major histological features that help to further characterize histological subtype are based on architecture, nuclear features and stromal features; Nottingham grading (detailed below); the presence or absence of tumour in the angiolymphatic spaces (only peritumoural lymphovascular invasion is assessed in breast cancer, and this should be differentiated from tissue retraction); and an associated in situ component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee SC, Jain PA, Jethwa SC, Tripathy D, Yamashita MW. Radiologist’s role in breast cancer staging: providing key information for clinicians. Radiographics. 2014;34(2):330–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ACR BIRADS atlas 5th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Popli MB. Pictorial essay: mammographic features of breast cancer. Ind J Radiol Imaging. 2001;11(4):175.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gokhale S. Ultrasound characterization of breast masses. Ind J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(3):242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO classification of tumours: breast tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta K, Kumaresan M, Venkatesan B, Chandra T, Patil A, Menon M. Sonographic features of invasive ductal breast carcinomas predictive of malignancy grade. Ind J Radiol Imaging. 2018;28(1):123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, Bluemke DA. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1719–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Joint Committee on Cancer. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (editors), Cancer staging manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moller Talman ML, Jensen MB, Rank F. Invasive lobular breast cancer. Prognostic significance of histological malignancy grading. Acta Oncologica. 2007;46(6):803–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopez JK, Bassett LW. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, US, and MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 2009;29(1):165–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marrazzo E, Frusone F, Milana F, Sagona A, Gatzemeier W, Barbieri E, Bottini A, Canavese G, Rubino AO, Eboli MG, Rossetti CM, Testori A, Errico V, De Luca A, Tinterri C. Mucinous breast cancer: a narrative review of the literature and a retrospective tertiary single-Centre analysis. Breast. 2020;49:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong SJ, Lim HS, Lee JS, Park MH, Yoon JH, Park JG, Kang HK. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: MRI findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(5):W482–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ha KY, DeLeon P, DeLeon W. Invasive mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2013;26(3):295–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Capella C, Eusebi V, Mann B, et al. Endocrine differentiation in mucoid carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology. 1980;4:613–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pareja F, Selenica P, Brown DN, Sebastiao APM, da Silva EM, Da Cruz PA, Del A, Fu L, Weigelt B, Brogi E, Reis-Filho JS, Wen HY. Micropapillary variant of mucinous carcinoma of the breast shows genetic alterations intermediate between those of mucinous carcinoma and micropapillary carcinoma. Histopathology. 2019;75(1):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13853. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bitencourt AG, Graziano L, Osório CA, Guatelli CS, Souza JA, Mendonça MH, Marques EF. MRI features of mucinous cancer of the breast: correlation with pathologic findings and other imaging methods. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(2):238–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vilaverde F, Rocha A, Reis A. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: advantages and limitations of breast tomosynthesis. Case Rep Radiol. 2016;2016:3906195.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernández-Aguilar S, et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast and associated intra-epithelial lesions: a comparative study with invasive low-grade ductal carcinomas. Virchows Arch. 2005;447(4):683–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donato H, Candelária I, Oliveira P, Gonçalo M, Caseiro-Alves F. Imaging findings of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast with pathologic correlation. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2018;102(1):46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. McMullen ER, Zoumberos NA, Kleer CG. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: update on histopathology and molecular alterations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(12):1492–6. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2019-0396-RA.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang YL, Liu BB, Zhang X, Fu L. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(8):799–805. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0040-RA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsuo K, Fukutomi T, Hasegawa T, Akashi-Tanaka S, Nanasawa T, Tsuda H. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of apocrine breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer. 2002;9(1):43–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Londero AP, Bernardi S, Bertozzi S, Angione V, Gentile G, Dri C, Minucci A, Caponnetto F, Petri R. Synchronous and metachronous breast malignancies: a cross-sectional retrospective study and review of the literature. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:250727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bozzini A, Renne G, Meneghetti L, Bandi G, Santos G, Vento AR, Menna S, Andrighetto S, Viale G, Cassano E, Bellomi M. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2008;8(1):275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harini Gnanavel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gnanavel, H. et al. (2023). Carcinoma Breast. In: Dev, B., Joseph, L.D. (eds) Holistic Approach to Breast Disease. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0035-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0035-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0034-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0035-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics