Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Renewed Interest in Nuclear Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Radiation Environment, Volume 1

  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

The rising demand for electricity due to increase in global population coupled with better standard of living of people has contributed to increased greenhouse gas emissions as compared to pre-industrial levels. To limit the impacts of climate change and reduce dependency on already depleting reserves of fossil fuels, there is a growing interest worldwide in environmentally sustainable energy generation sources for providing power to industries, commercial establishments as well as houses. This chapter deliberates on the various events that have shaped the international perception of nuclear energy, pros and cons of nuclear power vis-a-vis other electricity generation systems and provides an assessment on the basis of technical, economic, life cycle, social and environmental parameters. Also discussed are the various non-electric applications of nuclear energy, average life-cycle carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions for different electricity generators as well as the importance of nuclear energy in achieving climate goals as per the Paris Agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sime RL (1998) Lise meitner and the discovery of nuclear fission. Sci Am 278(1):80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herken G (2000) Cardinal choices. Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker M (1991) Science, medicine and cultural imperialism. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seed D (2000) Dawn of atomic age. In: Seed D (ed) Imagining apocalypse: studies in clutural crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 88–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohta Y, Mine M, Wakasugi M, Yoshimine E, Himuro Y, Yoneda M, Yamaguchi S, Mikita A, Morikawa T (2000) Psychological effect of the Nagasaki atomic bombing on survivors after half a century. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 54:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weart SR (1991) Images of nuclear energy: Why people feel the way they do. IAEA Bullet 30–36

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walker JS, Wellock TR (2010) A short history of nuclear regulations, 1946–2009. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Atomic Energy Agency (2013) Eisenhower's atoms for peace: the speech that inspired the creation of the IAEA. IAEA Bullet 3–4, 4 Dec 2013

    Google Scholar 

  9. Science History Institute Museum and Library (2023) Digital collections - atoms for peace first day issue. Science History Institute Museum and Library. https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/c7jixao/viewer/aphw8u5. Accessed 14 July 2023

  10. Hore-Lacy I (2007) History of nuclear energy. In: Nuclear energy in the 21st century. Elsevier, pp 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg SM, Rosner R (2011) Nuclear reactors: generation to generation. American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bodansky D (2005) Nuclear energy: principles, practises and prospects. Springer New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mendl W (1965) The background of French nuclear policy. In: International affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol 41, no 1, pp 22–36

    Google Scholar 

  14. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1954) US NRC documents ML1613. 16 Sept 1954. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1613/ML16131A120.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2023

  15. World Nuclear Association (2022) World Nuclear Performance Report 2022. World Nuclear Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rhodes R, Beller D (2000) The need for nuclear power: viewpoint on the world's challenging energy future. IAEA Bullet 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. World Nuclear Association, “Uranium Markets,” World Nuclear Association, July 2023. [Online]. Available: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/uranium-markets.aspx. [Accessed 13 August 2023].

  18. Stamford L, Azapagic A (2011) Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power. Energy 36(10):6037–6057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Nuclear Association (2022) Carbon dioxide emission from electricity. Oct 2022. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-electricity.aspx. Accessed 3 Dec 2022

  20. Stamford L, Azapagic A (2012) Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK. Int J Energy Res 36:1263–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. United Nations (2023) Take action for the sustainable development goals. 31 May 2023. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 16 June 2023

  22. Schneider MFA (2020) The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2020. Mycle Schneider Consulting Project, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  23. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1979) Experimental Breeder Reactor I Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. ASME

    Google Scholar 

  24. US Department of Energy and US Department of the Navy (2013) The United States Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. US DOE

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erskine HG (1963) The polls: atomic weapons and nuclear energy. Public Opin Q 27(2):155–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Office of Technology Assessment (1984) Nuclear power in an age of uncertainty. US Congress, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barona J, Herzog S (2020) Public opinion on nuclear energy and nuclear weapons: The attitudinal nexus in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci 68:101567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. AM Petros'yants AM (1984) A pioneer of nuclear power. IAEA Bullet 42–46. Dec 1984

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones CG (2005) A review of the history of US radiation protection regulations, recommendations and standards. Health Phys 88(2):105–124

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hall JA (1987) The international atomic energy agency: origins and early years. Peace through scientific co-operation became an abiding purpose. IAEA Bullet 47–54. June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Auffant M (2022) Oil for atoms: the 1970s energy crisis and nuclear proliferation in the persian gulf. Texas National Security Review, vol 5, no 3

    Google Scholar 

  32. Char NL, Casik BJ (1987) Nuclear power development: history and outlook. IAEA Bullet 19–25. Sept 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lattanzio RK (2022) Clean air act: a summary of the act and its major requirements. Congressional Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  34. Robert LK, Barsky B (2002) Do we really know that oil caused the great stagflation? A monetary alternative. In: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2001

    Google Scholar 

  35. History.com Editors (2009) Watergate Scandal. History, 29 Oct 2009. https://www.history.com/topics/1970s/watergate. Accessed 14 July 2023

  36. Schneider M (2008) Nuclear power in France: beyond the Myth. Greens-EFA Group, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fehner TR, Gosling FG (2006) Battlefield of the cold war the Nevada test site. Atmospheric nuclear weapons testing 1951–1963, vol I. US Department of Energy

    Google Scholar 

  38. International Atomic Energy Agency (1970) Treaty on the non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kerr PK, Nikitin MBD (2023) Arms control and nonproliferation: a catalog of treaties and agreements. Congressional Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  40. Corey GR (1979) A brief review of the accident at Three Mile Island. IAEA Bullet 54–59. Oct 1979

    Google Scholar 

  41. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2003) Three Mile Island fact sheet. US NRC, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  42. Eklund S (1981) Nuclear power development-the challenge of the 1980s. IAEA Bullet 8–18. Sept 1981

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schneider M (2013) Nuclear power and the French energy transition: It’s the economics, stupid! Bullet At Sci 69(1)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mukaibo T (1986) Report from Japan: nuclear experience, prospects and plans. IAEA Bullet 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  45. World Information Service on Energy (2011), Chernobyl: chronology of disaster. WISE

    Google Scholar 

  46. World Health Organization (1995) Health consequences of the Chernobyl accident. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  47. International Atomic Energy Agency (2006) Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  48. The Chernobyl Forum (2006) Chernobyl’s legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  49. Baverstock K, Williams D (2006) The Chernobyl accident 20 years on: an assessment of the health consequences and the international response. Environ Health Perspect 114(9):1312–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hasenöhrl U, Kupper P (2021) Historicizing renewables: issues and challenges. Hist Technol 37(4):397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hu C, Woite G (1993) Nuclear power development in Asia. IAEA Bullet 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lester RK, Rosner R (2009) The growth of nuclear power: drivers and constraints. Daedalus 138(4):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. JA Lake JA (2006) The renaissance of nuclear energy. Econ Perspect 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  54. International Atomic Energy Agency (2015) The Fukushima Daiichi accident. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kramm L (2012) The German nuclear phase-out after Fukushima: a peculiar path or an example for others? Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 3(4):251–262

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hayashi M, Hughes L (2013) The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security. Energy Policy 59:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zissler R, Ohbayashi M (2019) The rise of renewable energy and the fall of nuclear power: competition of low carbon technologies. Renewable Energy Institute, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  58. Suzuki T (2015) Nuclear energy policy issues in Japan after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Asian Perspect 39(4):591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (2017) Nuclear power generation in Asia-Pacific-current policies and future perspectives. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dassonville C, Siemen T (2022) Nuclear energy: the arguments for the debate. Competence Centre for Climate and Social Justice|FES Just Climate, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  61. Locatelli G, Bingham C, Mancini M (2014) Small modular reactors: a comprehensive overview of their economics and strategic aspects. Prog Nucl Energy 73:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Skalamera M (2023) The geopolitics of energy after the invasion of Ukraine. Wash Q 46(1):7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Takizawa H (2021) Current status of Japan’s nuclear power. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dodman B (2023) France mulls nuclear revamp as Ukraine war prompts an energy mix rethink. France24, 13 Mar 2023. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20230313-france-mulls-nuclear-revamp-as-ukraine-war-prompts-an-energy-mix-rethink. Accessed 18 July 2023

  65. Nuclear Newswire (2023) Countries change nuclear policies in response to Ukraine war. Nuclear Newswire, 06 Jan 2023. https://www.ans.org/news/article-4623/countries-change-nuclear-policies-in-response-to-ukraine-war/. Accessed 18 July 2023

  66. Yurii A, Shomuyiwa DO, Zharkova A, Pavlo K (2022) Protecting the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant: a call for global action! Public Health Challenges

    Google Scholar 

  67. International Atomic Energy Agency (2022) Nuclear safety, security and safeguards in Ukraine: 2nd summary report by the director general. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (2023) Inflation reduction act expands support for nuclear power plants. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, 06 July 2023. https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/inflation-reduction-act-expands-support-for-nuclear-power-plants.html. Accessed 18 July 2023.

  69. UNESCO (2017) UNESCO moving forward the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  70. UNDP (2022) Sustainable development goals. 15 May 2022. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals

  71. Rogelj J, Shindell D, Jiang K, Fifita S, Forster P, Ginzburg V, Handa C, Kheshgi H, Kobayashi S, Kriegler E, Mundaca L, Séférian R, Vilarino MV, Calvin K, de Oliveira de Portugal Pereira JC, Edelenbosch O, Emmerling J, Fuss S, Gasser T, Gillett N, He C, Hertwich E, Höglund-Isaksson L, Huppmann D, Luderer G, Markandya A, Meinshausen M, McCollum D, Millar R, Popp A, Purohit P, Riahi K, Ribes A, Saunders H, Schädel C, Smith C, Smith P, Trutnevyte E, Xu Y, Zhou W, Zickfeld K (2018). Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Zhou MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (Eds.), Global warming of 1.5 °C pp 93–174. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  72. UKCOP26 (2022) COP26 goals. 15 May 2022. https://ukcop26.org/cop26-goals/

  73. UNECE (2021) Life cycle assessment of electricity generation options. UNECE, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  74. IEA (2020) Renewables 2020: analysis and forecast to 2025. IEA, France

    Google Scholar 

  75. Klopffer W, Grahl B (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practise. WIley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Wenheim

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. OECD NEA (2011) Technical and economic aspects of load following with nuclear power plants. OECD NEA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Stamford L, Azapagic A (2014) Life cycle sustainability assessment of UK electricity scenarios to 2070. Energy Sustain Dev 23:194–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. WNA (2021) Supply of Uranium. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/supply-of-uranium.aspx. Accessed 11 May 2022

  79. NEA and IAEA (2020) Uranium 2020: resources production and demand. OECD NEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  80. Schneider M, Froggatt A (2020) The world nuclear industry status report 2020. Mycle Schneider Consulting Project, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nea OECD (2018) The full costs of electricity provision. OECD NEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  82. US EIA (2022) Today in energy 2020. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45176. Accessed 11 May 2022

  83. Wang L, Wang Y, Du H, Zuo J, Man Li,RY, Zhou Z, Bi F, Garvlehn M (2019) A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power; A Chine study. Appl Energy 249:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  84. WHO (2020) WHO methods and data sources for gloval burden of disease estimates 2000–2019. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  85. IAEA (2022) Status and trends in spent fuel and radioactive waste management. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  86. WNA (2021) World nuclear performance report 2021. WNA, England and Wales

    Google Scholar 

  87. NPCIL (2021) NPCIL all plants. https://www.npcil.nic.in/content/302_1_AllPlants.aspx. Accessed 16 May 2022

  88. Patel S (2022) Flexible operation of nuclear power plants ramps up, 2019. https://www.powermag.com/flexible-operation-of-nuclear-power-plants-ramps-up/. Accessed 11 May 2022.

  89. WNA (2022) Nuclear fuel cycle overview, 2021. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/introduction/nuclear-fuel-cycle-overview.aspx. Accessed 11 May 2022

  90. Foro Nuclear (2021) Inforgraphics. https://www.foronuclear.org/en/resources/infographics/refueling-outage-in-spanish-nuclear-power-plants/. Accessed 11 May 2022

  91. ANS (2021) Power and oeprations. https://www.ans.org/news/article-2618/canadas-darlington1-ends-record-run/. Accessed 11 May 2022

  92. Bhose M (2019) 962-day continuous operation, Kaiga sets world record. https://www.deccanherald.com/national/940-day-continuous-operation-710840.html. Accessed 11 May 2022.

  93. Nea OECD (2007) Risks and benefits of nuclear energy. OECD NEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  94. IEA (2019) Average power generation construction time. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/average-power-generation-construction-time-capacity-weighted-2010-2018. Accessed 15 May 2022.

  95. IAEA (2021) Nuclear power reactors in the world. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sbesta (2021) Profiling the five largest solar power plants in India. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/largest-solar-power-plants-india/. Accessed 12 May 2022.

  97. Energy NS (2020) Profiling the top five wind power farms in India. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/top-wind-power-farms-india/. Accessed 12 May 2022

  98. IEA and NEA (2020) Projected costs of generating electricity. OECD NEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  99. WNA (2022) Uranium markets. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/uranium-markets.aspx. Accessed 12 May 2022

  100. Masanet E, Chang Y, Gopal A, Larsen P, Morrow W, Sathre R, Shehabi A, Zhai P (2013) Life-cycle assessment of electric power systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38:107–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Ding N, Liu J, Yang J, Yand D (2017) Comparative life cycle assessment of regional electricity supplies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 119:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Schlöemer S, Bruckner T, Fulton L, Hertwich E, McKinnon A, Perczyk D, Roy J, Schaeffer R, Sims R, Smith P, Wiser R (2014) Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T and Minx JC (eds.)]. Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  103. Anconda D, Mcveigh J (2001) Wind turbine-materials and manufacturing fact sheet. Princeton Energy Resources International LLC

    Google Scholar 

  104. WANO (2014) Performance indicators. WANO, London

    Google Scholar 

  105. IAEA (1996) One decade after Chernobyl: summing up the consequences of the accident. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  106. WNA (2021) Fukushima Daiichi accident. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-daiichi-accident.aspx. Accessed 14 May 2022

  107. BBC (2018) Japan confirms first Fukushima worker death from radiation. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45423575. Accessed 14 May 2022

  108. IRENA (2016) End of life management-solar photovoltaic panels. IRENA, Abu Dhabi

    Google Scholar 

  109. Stella C (2019) Unfurling the waste problem caused by wind energy. https://www.npr.org/2019/09/10/759376113/unfurling-the-waste-problem-caused-by-wind-energy. Accessed 15 May 2022

  110. May 2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/nuclear-power-in-a-clean-energy-system. Accessed 15 May 2023

  111. IPCC (1996) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  112. 2018. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/TAR-01.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2023

  113. 2022. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2022. Accessed 15 May 2023.

  114. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change. Accessed 15 May 2023.

  115. https://pris.iaea.org/pris/. Accessed 15 May 2023.

  116. https://climate.selectra.com/en/carbon-footprint/most-polluting-countries. Accessed 15 May 2023

  117. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement. Accessed 15 May 2023

  118. https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector. Accessed 15 May 2023

  119. IEA (2021) Net zero by 2050: a roadmap for the global energy sector. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  120. https://www.world-nuclear.org/our-association/what-we-do/the-harmony-programme.aspx. Accessed 15 May 2023.

  121. Cometto M, Contri P, Gulerce Z, Lazerwitz B, Magne B, Tot M, Turton H, Heek A (2022) Climate change and nuclear power securing clean energy for climate resilience

    Google Scholar 

  122. Ramana MV (2015) The forgotten history of small nuclear reactors. IEEE Spectr 52(5):44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Welter K, Reyes Jr J, Brigantic A (2023) Unique safety features and licensing requirements of the NuScale small modular reactor. Front Energy Res 11:1160150

    Google Scholar 

  124. Hussein EM (2020) Emerging small modular nuclear power reactors: a critical review. Phys Open 5:100038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Ingersoll D, Houghton Z, Bromm R, Desportes C (2014) NuScale small modular reactor for Co-generation of electricity and water. Desalination 340:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Shobeiri E, Genco F, Hoornweg D, Tokuhiro A (2023) Small modular reactor deployment and obstacles to be overcome. Energies 16:3468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Roser M, Rosado P, Ritchie H (2022) Energy. Our World in Data

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiation Safety Systems Division, Health, Safety and Environment Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, 400085, India

    Anirudh Chandra & Roopashree Shrivastava

Authors
  1. Anirudh Chandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roopashree Shrivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anirudh Chandra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Health, Safety and Environment Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Dinesh Kumar Aswal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chandra, A., Shrivastava, R. (2024). Renewed Interest in Nuclear Power. In: Aswal, D.K. (eds) Handbook on Radiation Environment, Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2795-7_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation