Skip to main content

Quantifying Opinion Rejection: A Method to Detect Social Media Echo Chambers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2024)

Abstract

Social media echo chambers are known to be common sources of misinformation and harmful ideologies that have detrimental impacts on society. Therefore, techniques to detect echo chambers are of great significance. Reinforcement of supporting opinions and rejection of dissenting opinions are two significant echo chamber properties that help detecting them in social networks. However, existing echo chamber detection methods do not capture the opinion rejection behaviour, which leads to poor echo chamber detection accuracy. Measures used by them do not facilitate quantifying both properties simultaneously while preserving the connectivity between echo chamber members. To address this problem, we propose a new measure, Signed Echo (SEcho) that quantifies opinion reinforcement and rejection properties of echo chambers and an echo chamber detection algorithm, Signed Echo Detection Algorithm (SEDA) based on this measure, which preserves the connectivity among echo chamber members. The experimental results for real-world data show that SEDA outperforms the state-of-the-art echo chamber detection methods in detecting the communities with echo chamber properties, such as reinforcement of supporting opinions, rejection of dissenting opinions, connectivity between community members, spread of mis/disinformation and emotional contagion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://sites.google.com/view/kushani/publications.

  2. 2.

    https://sites.google.com/view/kushani/publications.

References

  1. Transfer learning in NLP for tweet stance classification. https://towardsdatascience.com/transfer-learning-in-NLP-for-tweet-stance-classification-8ab014da8dde. Accessed 29 Nov 2022

  2. Alatawi, F., Cheng, L., Tahir, A., et al.: A survey on echo chambers on social media: description, detection and mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05084 (2021)

  3. Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Del Vicario, M., et al.: Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PLoS ONE 11(8), e0159641 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., et al.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. JSTAT 2008(10), P10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi, D., Chun, S., Oh, H., et al.: Rumor propagation is amplified by echo chambers in social media. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cinelli, M., Morales, G.D.F., Galeazzi, A., et al.: The echo chamber effect on social media. PNAS 118(9), e2023301118 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cossard, A., Morales, G.D.F., Kalimeri, K., et al.: Falling into the echo chamber: the Italian vaccination debate on Twitter. In: Proceedings of ICWSM, vol. 14, pp. 130–140 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cota, W., Ferreira, S.C., Pastor-Satorras, R., et al.: Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Sci. 8(1), 1–13 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamieson, K.H., Cappella, J.N.: Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, vol. 1, p. 2 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamsal, R.: Design and analysis of a large-scale Covid-19 tweets dataset. Appl. Intell. 51(5), 2790–2804 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levy, G., Razin, R.: Echo chambers and their effects on economic and political outcomes. Annu. Rev. Econ. 11, 303–328 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S.J., et al.: Measuring the impact of Covid-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5(3), 337–348 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen, C.T.: Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme 17(2), 141–161 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pons, P., Latapy, M.: Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In: Yolum, I., Güngör, T., Gürgen, F., Özturan, C. (eds.) ISCIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3733, pp. 284–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11569596_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosvall, M., Axelsson, D., Bergstrom, C.T.: The map equation. EPJ-ST 178(1), 13–23 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Törnberg, P.: Echo chambers and viral misinformation: modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLOS ONE 13(9), e0203958 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Villa, G., Pasi, G., Viviani, M.: Echo chamber detection and analysis. SNAM 11(1), 1–17 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xia, C., Luo, Y., Wang, L., et al.: A fast community detection algorithm based on reconstructing signed networks. IEEE Syst. J. 16(1), 614–625 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Defence Science and Technology Group (DSTG), Australia, under the grant number, MyIP 11113.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kushani Perera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

Author, Kushani Perera is funded by DSTG, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perera, K., Karunasekera, S. (2024). Quantifying Opinion Rejection: A Method to Detect Social Media Echo Chambers. In: Yang, DN., Xie, X., Tseng, V.S., Pei, J., Huang, JW., Lin, J.CW. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14650. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2266-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2266-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-2265-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-2266-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics