Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of Editor, Reviewer, and Author in Plastic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Good Physician, Good Plastic Surgeon

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

Twelve stories were collected which were written from the perspective of an editor and reviewer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kim JT. The value of originality and proper quotation. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39:279–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Huh S. How should authors address copyright issues before submission of manuscripts? Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39:445–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Oxford dictionaries. Devil's advocate. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/devil%27s%2Badvocate?q=devil%27s+advocate.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wikipedia. Devil's advocate [internet]. Wikimedia Foundation Inc.; 2013. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil%27s_advocate.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fanning W. Promotor fidei [Internet]. New York: Robert Appleton Company; 1911. [cited 2013 Apr 7]. Available from: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12454a.htm

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rolland R. Jean Christophe, Cannan G. translator. Whitefish, MN: Kessinger Publishing; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang K. The origins of deltopectoral flaps and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:1845–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peh WC, Ng KH. Role of the manuscript reviewer. Singapore Med J. 2009;50:931–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang K. The need for a reviewer to play Devil's advocate. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40:171–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kachewar SG, Sankaye SB. Reviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewer. Mens Sana Monogr. 2013;11:274–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC. Getting the most from review articles: a guide for readers and writers. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55:2155–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heller S. The changing role of a publisher and the publisher of the future. Drug News Perspect. 2007;20:413–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinhauser G, Adlassnig W, Risch JA, et al. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theor Med Bioeth. 2012;33:359–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, et al. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PLoS One. 2010;5:e10072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science. 1968;159:56–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstude K, Mussweiler T. What you feel is how you compare: how comparisons influence the social induction of affect. Emotion. 2009;9:1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. OECD. Frascati manual: proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. 6th ed; 2002. http://www.oecd.org/sti/frascatimanua. Accessed 27 May 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Levi B, Longaker MT. Research training in plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:383–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toledo-Pereyra LH. Ten qualities of a good researcher. J Investig Surg. 2012;25:201–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. Ethical principles of research in the humanities and social and Behavioural sciences and proposals for ethical review. http://www.uta.fi/english/research/ethics/guidelines/autonomy.html. Accessed 9 Oct 2016.

  21. Hwang K. Sine qua non conditions for research. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:594–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Qian S, Shiji (History) Biographies of Lian Po and Lin Xiangru. Seoul. Korea: Samsung Press; 2019. p. 218–29.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clayware HK, a potter. Seoul. Korea: Jaenam; 2020. p. 140–1.

    Google Scholar 

  24. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the role of authors and contributors. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed 14 Jun 2019.

  25. Saunders JBdeCM, O’Malley CD. The anatomical drawings of Andreas Vesalius. New York: Bonanza Books; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Woodruff P. The ajax dilemma: justice, fairness, and rewards. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (Updated Dec 2019). http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2020.

  28. Choi J. Cosmetic surgery: is it science or art? Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:672–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Teng PK, Ling TJ, Seng KW. Propensity to undergo cosmetic surgery and services in Seoul. Int J Commun Dev Manag Stud. 2019;3:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang DW. Plastic surgeons of Korean heritage: why it matters to me. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46:1–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ISAPS). ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2015 [internet]. Hanover, NH: ISAPS; 2019. [cited 2019 Jul 15]. https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/2016-ISAPS-Results-1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Seoul Touch Up. Korean plastic surgery statistics. Seoul: Seoul Touch Up; 2012. https://www.seoultouchup.com/korean-plastic-surgery-statistics/.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim KS. Into a global future with our members to serve the people. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46:99–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Korea (Republic of)

    Kun Hwang

Authors
  1. Kun Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Hwang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hwang, K. (2024). Role of Editor, Reviewer, and Author in Plastic Surgery. In: Good Physician, Good Plastic Surgeon. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1864-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1864-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-1863-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-1864-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation