Skip to main content

Economic Instruments and Their Revenue Expenditures Toward Green Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Transitions and Climate Change Issues in Asia

Abstract

Asian countries have been facing various environmental problems, ranging from air and water pollution to climate change. At the same time, many people seek higher income and further economic development, which requires more government revenue. This paper introduces carbon pricing, environmental tax, and emissions trading schemes, all schemes that can help achieve the two objectives: environmental conservation and revenue raising. The paper reviews experiences from the implementation of these policy instruments from the perspective of raising revenue and the effectiveness in environmental conservation with focus on Asia. Specifically, the experiences in India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the People’s Republic of China, and Singapore show that governments can raise revenue while reducing emissions. We conclude our paper with policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.nccs.gov.sg/media/publications/singapores-national-communications-and-biennial-update-reports.

  2. 2.

    Source: Carbon tax revenue is from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1241742/carbon-tax-revenues-worldwide-by-selected-country/. The amount of carbon tax collection was S$197.6 million ($147.3 million) according to Haver. The total tax revenue is from https://data.gov.sg/dataset/iras-collection-by-tax-type-annual.

  3. 3.

    Cess can be defined as a specific form of tax levied by the government over the base tax liability of the taxpayer, for revenue generation for any specific purposes.

  4. 4.

    https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout=list&systems%5b%5d=46.

  5. 5.

    https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/map_data.

  6. 6.

    The economic agent with inelastic demand (or supply) bears tax burden most, while an agent with elastic demand (or supply) can avoid or bears the least (tax) burden. Thus, while higher price (induced by tax) may be effective for correcting the externality and internalizing the cost (on society), this has direct effect on household budget and, subsequently, the welfare of the households.

  7. 7.

    https://www.ema.gov.sg/cmsmedia/8RSU.pdf.

  8. 8.

    https://www.e-stat.go.jp/statsearch/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00200561&tstat=000000330001&cycle=7&tclass1=000000330001&tclass2=000000330019&tclass3=000000330020&tclass4val=0.

  9. 9.

    We must mention that there may be backlash against carbon taxes, even when the tax increase is gradual (e.g., Yellow Jackets movement in France).

References

  • Agnolucci, P. (2009). The effect of the German and British environmental taxation reforms: A simple assessment. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3043–3051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberini, A., Gans, W., & Velez-Lopez, D. (2011). Residential consumption of gas and electricity in the US: The role of prices and income. Energy Economics, 33(5), 870–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimura, T. H., & Abe, T. (2021). The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: What factor contributed to the emission reduction? Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23(3), 517–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimura, T. H., Kaneko, S., Managi, S., Shinkuma, T., Yamamoto, M., & Yoshida, Y. (2019). Political economy of voluntary approaches: A lesson from environmental policies in Japan. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimura, T. H., & Matsumoto, S. (2021). Carbon pricing in Japan. Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimura, T.H., Sugino, M. (2023) Implications of deglobalization on energy and carbon neutrality in Asia and the Pacific Region. Asian Economic Policy Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12444

  • Arimura, T. H., Duan, M., & Oh, H. (2021). EEPS special issue on carbon pricing in East Asia. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzaghi, M., & Squalli, J. (2015). How price inelastic is demand for gasoline in fuel-subsidizing economies? Energy Economics, 50, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. (2018). The (Republic of) Korea emissions trading scheme. Challenges and emerging opportunities. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/469821/korea-emissions-trading-scheme.pdf

  • Asian Development Bank. (2020). Briefing note on ETS progress of PRC. Briefing notes to EASI/EARD. (December). Internal. Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. (2021a). Greening markets: market-based approaches for environmental management in Asia. https://www.adb.org/publications/greening-markets-environmental-management-asia

  • Asian Development Bank. (2021b). Role of carbon pricing to foster green recovery and growth. Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS210403-2

  • Bernard, J. T., Bolduc, D., & Yameogo, N. D. (2011). A pseudo-panel data model of household electricity demand. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(1), 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuermann, C., & Santarius, T. (2006). Ecological tax reform in Germany: Handling two hot potatoes at the same time. Energy Policy, 34(8), 917–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg. (2021). Top carbon market launch won’t help (the People’s Republic of) China tame emissions yet. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-16/top-polluter-china-launches-trading-in-biggest-carbon-market

  • Bureau, B. (2011). Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France. Energy Economics, 33(1), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Liao, H. (2015). Is the price elasticity of demand for coal in China increasing? China Economic Review, 36, 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, T., Lyons, S., Scott, S., Tol, R. S., & Verde, S. (2009). The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy, 37(2), 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, T. (2021). Pricing carbon: Trade-offs and opportunities for India. In A. Mitra (Ed.), Reconciling India’s climate and industrial targets: A policy roadmap (pp. 73–88). Observer Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Carbon Forum. (2018). 2018 (People’s Republic of) China carbon pricing survey. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://ets-china.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2018-CCPS-EN-E-version.pdf

  • Chindarkar, N., & Goyal, N. (2019). One price doesn’t fit all: An examination of heterogeneity in price elasticity of residential electricity in India. Energy Economics, 81, 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicenia, A. (2018, January 18). (People’s Republic of) China’s environmental protection tax. China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-environmental-protection-tax/

  • Cronin, J. A., Fullerton, D., & Sexton, S. (2019). Vertical and horizontal redistributions from a carbon tax and rebate. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S169–S208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabla-Norris, E., Daniel, J., Nozaki, M., Alonso, C., Balasundharam, V., Bellon, M., & Kilpatrick, J. (2021). Fiscal policies to address climate change in Asia and the Pacific. Departmental Papers, 2021, 007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dergiades, T., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2008). Estimating residential demand for electricity in the United States, 1965–2006. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2722–2730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissou, Y., & Siddiqui, M. S. (2014). Can carbon taxes be progressive? Energy Economics, 42, 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E., Greenstone, M., & Hanna, R. (2008). Indoor air pollution, health and economic well-being. SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, 1(1), 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency. (1997). Japan’s experience of air pollution: Challenge to the sustainable development. Kogai Kenko Higai Hosho Yobo Kyokai.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. Retrieved May 7 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/carbon_border_adjustment_mechanism_0.pdf

  • Fan, S., & Hyndman, R. J. (2011). The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3709–3719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K. (2007). Output-based allocation of emission permits for mitigating tax and trade interactions. Land Economics, 83(4), 575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowlie, M., Petersen, C., & Reguant, M. (2021). Border carbon adjustments when carbon intensity varies across producers: Evidence from California. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremstad, A., & Paul, M. (2019). The impact of a carbon tax on inequality. Ecological Economics, 163, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzke, F., & Vance, C. (2021). An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States? Energy Economics, 95, 104982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, J. H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 157–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M., Pande, R., Ryan, N., & Sudarshan, A. (2019). The Surat emissions trading scheme a first look at the world’s first particulate trading system. Retrieved September 1, 2021, from https://epic.uchicago.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ETS_INDIA_ResearchSummaryFinal-.pdf

  • Gujarat Pollution Control Board. (2019). Pilot emissions trading scheme for selected industries in Surat, Gujarat. Retrieved September 1, 2021, from https://gpcb.gujarat.gov.in/uploads/GPCB_ETS_CIRCULAR_19112019.pdf

  • Hamamoto, M. (2021a). Impact of the Saitama prefecture target-setting emissions trading program on the adoption of low-carbon technology. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23, 501–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamamoto, M. (2021b). Target-setting emissions trading program in Saitama prefecture: Impact on CO2 emissions in the first compliance period. In T. H. Arimura & S. Matsumoto (Eds.), Carbon pricing in Japan (pp. 117–127). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., Liu, S., Han, Y., & Peng, K. (2020). The nature of state-owned enterprises and collection of pollutant discharge fees: A study based on Chinese industrial enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Knittel, C. R., & Sperling, D. (2008). Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. The Energy Journal, 29(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, J., & Oh, H. (2015). (The Republic of) Korea’s emissions trading system: an attempt of non-annex i party countries to reduce GHG emissions voluntarily. PMR Presentation and Article. Retrieved from https://www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/KETS_HyunOh1.pdf

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). The role of (the People’s Republic of) China’s ETS in power sector decarbonization. A joint paper by the IEA and Tsinghua Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy. Retrieved September 6, 2021, from https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-chinas-ets-in-power-sector-decarbonisation

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) (2018). India’s energy transition: Subsidies for fossil fuels and renewable energy, 2018 update. Retrieved August 23, 2021, from https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/india-energy-transition-2018update.pdf

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2020). Mapping India’s energy subsidies 2020: Fossil fuels, renewables, and electric vehicles 2020 Annex Update. Retrieved August 23, 2021, from https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/india-energy-transition-2020-annex.pdf

  • International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2021a). (The People’s Republic of) China National ETS. Retrieved August 9, 2021, from https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout=list&systems%5B%5D=55

  • International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2021b). Kazakhstan emissions trading scheme. Retrieved October 22, 2021, from https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout=list&systems%5B%5D=46

  • International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) (2021c). (The Republic of) Korea emissions trading scheme. Retrieved August 9 , 2021, from https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout=list&systems%5B%5D=47

  • International Emissions Trading Association. (2020). Carbon market business brief: (Republic of) Korea. Retrieved June 16, 2021, from https://ieta.org/resources/Resources/CarbonMarketBusinessBrief/CarbonMarketBusinessBriefsKorea2020.pdf

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2017). Energy access outlook 2017: From poverty to prosperity. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from https://www.oecd.org/publications/energy-access-outlook-2017-9789264285569en.htm

  • Inoue, N., Matsumoto, S., & Morita, M. (2021). Inequalities in the impact of the carbon tax in Japan. In T. H. Arimura & S. Matsumoto (Eds.), Carbon Pricing in Japan (pp. 217–234). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K. (2014). Do consumers respond to marginal or average price? Evidence from nonlinear electricity pricing. American Economic Review, 104(2), 537–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association. (2020). Japanese automobile industry 2020. Retrieved from https://www.jama.or.jp/industry/ebook/2020/book_j/book.pdf

  • Jeuland, M., Pattanayak, S. K., & Bluffstone, R. (2015). The economics of household air pollution. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 7(1), 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, S., Jiang, F., Li, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). Assessment of the performances of pollutant discharge fee in (the People’s Republic of) China. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z., & Shao, S. (2014). Distributional effects of a carbon tax on Chinese households: A case of Shanghai. Energy Policy, 73, 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanjilal, K., & Ghosh, S. (2018). Revisiting income and price elasticity of gasoline demand in India: New evidence from cointegration tests. Empirical Economics, 55(4), 1869–1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K., Koshal, M., Yamamoto, K., Miyazima, S., & Yamada, Y. (2007). Demand for gasoline in Japan. Demand for Gasoline in Japan, 1000–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Meena, H. M., & Verma, K. (2017). Water pollution in India: its impact on the human health: Causes and remedies. International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences 12(2), 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyo, S., Janzen, B. G., & Smith, H. M. (2009). Border adjustment measures in proposed us climate change legislation-a new chapter in America’s leadership on climate change. Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 9(3), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Duan, M., Deng, Z., & Zhang, H. (2021). Assessment of the performance of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in (the People’s Republic of) China. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23(3), 593–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. (2017). (The People’s Republic of) China: New law replacing pollution discharge fee with environmental protection tax. Retrieved August 6, 2021, from https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2017-02-08/china-new-law-replacing-pollution-discharge-fee-with-environmental-protection-tax/

  • Lin, C. Y. C., & Zeng, J. J. (2013). The elasticity of demand for gasoline in (the People’s Republic of) China. Energy Policy, 59, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. (2017). Cess. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://mpcb.gov.in/miscellaneous-topics-information/cess

  • Mathur, A., & Morris, A. C. (2014). Distributional effects of a carbon tax in broader US fiscal reform. Energy Policy, 66, 326–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehling, M. A., Van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C. (2019). Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law, 113(3), 433–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, H., & Rehdanz, K. (2010). Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Great Britain. Energy Economics, 32(5), 949–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment (MoE,Government of Japan). (2021). Emission reduction effect from tax for climate change mitigation. Presented at the Carbon Pricing Subcommittee, the Environmental Council of Ministry of the Environment (in Japanese). Retrieved September 7, 2021, from https://www.env.go.jp/council/06earth/shiryou2.pdf

  • Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF, Government of India). (2011). Detailed project report: Pilot emissions trading schemes in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. Retrieved January 15, 2020, from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Detailed%20Project%20Report-mfes.pdf

  • Ministry of Forest, Environment and Climate Change. (Government of India). (1977). The water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://moef.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/No_36_1977_0.pdf

  • Ministry of Finance (MoF, Government of Japan). (2021, in Japanese). Green. Submitted to Fiscal System Council. Retrieved September 7, 2021, from https://www.mof.go.jp/about_mof/councils/fiscal_system_council/sub-of_fiscal_system/proceedings_sk/material/zaiseier20210430/1.pdf

  • Ministry of Law and Justice (Government of India). (2003, March 17). The water (prevention and control of pollution) Cess (Amendment) Act, 2003. New Delhi. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://www.iitr.ac.in/wfw/web_ua_water_for_welfare/water/wc_act_03.pdf

  • Morita, M., & Arimura, T. H. (2015). A policy evaluation of the eco-point program: the program’s impact on CO2 reductions and the replacement of home appliances. In Environmental subsidies to consumers (pp. 105–124). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortha, A., Arimura, T. H., Takeda, S., & Chesnokonova, T. (2023). Effect of a European carbon border adjustment mechanism on the APAC region: A structural gravity analysis. Discussion papers 23058, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, I., Mylonas, V., & Vernon, N. (2019). Reforming energy policy in India: Assessing the options. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. E., Loomis, D., & Wilson, R. (2011). Residential natural gas demand in Illinois: Evidence from the ARDL bounds testing approach. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 41(2), 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Information Bureau (PIB,Government of India). (2010). Proactive steps in budget 2010–11 for the environment. Retrieved August 11, 2021, from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=58419.02/06/2014

  • Rehdanz, K. (2007). Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Germany. Energy Economics, 29(2), 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2019a). Indoor air pollution. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://ourworldindata.org/indoor-air-pollution

  • Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2019b). Outdoor air pollution. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://ourworldindata.org/outdoor-air-pollution

  • Roppongi, H., Suwa, A., & Puppim De Oliveira, J. A. (2017). Innovating in sub-national climate policy: The mandatory emissions reduction scheme in Tokyo. Climate Policy, 17(4), 516–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, T., Qadir, M., Yamamoto, S., Endo, T., & Zahoor, A. (2013). Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation, treatment, and use. Agricultural Water Management, 130, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore National Climate Change Secretariat. (2020). Fourth biennial update. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.nccs.gov.sg/media/publications/singapores-national-communications-and-biennial-update-reports

  • Stone, C. (2015). The design and implementation of policies to protect low-income households under a carbon tax. Issue brief, Resources for the Future. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/9-21-15climate.pdf

  • Sugino, M., Morita, M., Iwata, K., & Arimura, T. H. (2017). Multiplier impacts and emission reduction effects of Joint Crediting Mechanism: Analysis with a Japanese and international disaggregated input–output table. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 19, 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0177-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, S., & Arimura, T. H. (2021). A computable general equilibrium analysis of environmental tax reform in Japan with a forward-looking dynamic model. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 503–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, S., Horie, T., & Arimura, T. H. (2012). A computable general equilibrium analysis of border adjustments under the cap-and-trade system: A case study of the Japanese economy. Climate Change Economics, 3(01), 1250003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. (2021). Budget 2021: Govt will review carbon tax rate, which will remain at $5 per tonne until 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/budget-2021-government-will-review-carbon-tax-rate-which-will-remain-at-5-per-tonne-until-2023

  • The Climate Reality Project. (2017). Handbook on carbon pricing instruments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timilsina, G. R. (2018). Where is the carbon tax after thirty years of research? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (8493).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verde, S. F., & Tol, R. S. (2009). The distributional impact of a carbon tax in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 40(3), 317.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2023). State and trends of carbon pricing 2023. Retrieved December 16, 2023, from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39796

  • Xu, S. (2021). Singapore says S$5 carbon tax ‘a start’ as it eyes higher levy. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-16/singapore-to-review-carbon-tax-increase-shortly-minister-says

  • Yamazaki, A. (2017). Jobs and climate policy: Evidence from British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S. H., Lim, H. J., & Kwak, S. J. (2009). Estimating the residential demand function for natural gas in Seoul with correction for sample selection bias. Applied Energy, 86(4), 460–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Zheng, X., & Han, Y. (2014). On the demand for natural gas in urban (People’s Republic of) China. Energy Policy, 70, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, A. A., & Resosudarmo, B. P. (2015). On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: The case of Indonesia. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 17(1), 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S., Chen, Z. M., Alsaedi, A., & Hayat, T. (2018). Price elasticity, block tariffs, and equity of natural gas demand in (the People’s Republic of) China: Investigation based on household-level survey data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Cai, W., & Feng, X. (2017). How do urban households in (the People’s Republic of) China respond to increasing block pricing in electricity? Evidence from a fuzzy regression discontinuity approach. Energy Policy, 105, 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Makoto Sugino, Aline Mortha, and Yukie Iwatsuka for comments and research assistance for this version. We also appreciate the comments from the reviewers of the first draft and the participants in the Asian Development Outlook workshop.

Funding

Toshi H. Arimura appreciated the financial support from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21H04945 and the Foundation of Japanese Bankers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshi H. Arimura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arimura, T.H., Chattopadhyay, M., Dendup, N., Tian, S.G. (2024). Economic Instruments and Their Revenue Expenditures Toward Green Asia. In: Lee, S., Zhang, S., Hong, J.H., Nabangchang-Srisawalak, O., Akao, KI., Resosudarmo, B.P. (eds) Energy Transitions and Climate Change Issues in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1773-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics