Abstract
Quality assessment of infrastructure often relies on performance and satisfaction analysis. Yet, pedestrians base their choices on previous experiences, perceptions, and infrastructure supportiveness, to which, traditional methods like Road Safety and Safety Performance Analysis fall short. Pedestrian decisions, influenced by ‘push factors’, determine whether they choose to walk or switch to other modes of transportation. Assigning numerical values to pedestrian experiences may lead to clustered responses due to personal biases. This paper employs a systems approach, applying Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis to understand the relationships between walkability factors and pedestrian behaviors. Further, the paper extracts important factors based on pedestrian behaviors: The paper identifies four groups of factors based on their importance in addressing pedestrian needs. It proposes a methodology for establishing hierarchies among qualitative factors, using different pedestrian behaviors as thresholds for different infrastructure conditions and experiences. Through the process, the paper identifies the absence of surface evenness, difficulty in accessing buses and IPT, and lack of cleanliness as the most important (linked factors) and common causes for various strategies ahead of the commencement of pedestrian journey. On the other side, inadequate night illumination, overcrowding, lack of continuity of walkways, presence of obstruction on walkways, lack of accessibility, and perception of an unsafe pedestrian environment as important factors that needs to be addressed as interventions to improve ‘on-arrival’ or on site experience of pedestrian supportiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Figures in bracket () adjacent to the factors represent their respective x and y co-ordinates, i.e., represented in Table 7.1 in Appendix 1.
References
Ahmad M, Tang X, Qiu J, Ahmad F (2019) Interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis for identifying and benchmarking significant factors of seismic soil liquefaction. Appl Sci 9(2):233
Alexander CM (1975) The oregon experiment (center for environmental structure series). Oxford University Press, Oregon, Eugene
Alfonzo MA (2005) To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environ Behav 37(6):808–836
Ashima A, Manoj Kumar K (2021) Crowd dynamics: a tool in shaping urban spaces. Int J Sci Res (IJSR)
Bhise R, Patil AP (2013) Role of adjoining edges in supporting pedestrians in public places. In: International conference on cities, people and places
Brierley K (2013) The effects of pedestrian delay and overcrowding on our streets & the rationale for shorter blocks and through blocks links. Karl Brierley, City of Melbourne
Budzynski M, Gobis A (2021) Assessment of the influence of road infrastructure parameters on the behaviour of drivers and pedestrians in pedestrian crossing areas. Energies
City Spidey (Community Reporter) (2022) Uneven footpaths in Dwarka—height of lack of planning. City Spidey https://www.cityspidey.com/news/16439/uneven-footpaths-in-dwarka-height-of-lack-of-planning#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20rules%20of,should%20be%2015%20cm%20maximum. Accessed 2 Feb 2022
Coppola NA, Marshall WE (2021) Sidewalk static obstructions and their impact on clear width. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 200–212
Doxiadis C (1970) Ekistics, the science of human settlements. Science 170(3956):393–404
Ewing R, Handy S (2009) Measuring the unmeasurable: urban design qualities related to walkability. J Urban Des 14(1):65–84
Farrington DP, Weish DB (2003, 2008) Effects of improved street lighting on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews
Felder M (2021) Familiarity as a practical sense of place. Sociol Theory 39(3):180–199
Fisk U (2016) Grist. Retrieved from Should you avoid walking if the air is polluted? https://grist.org/living/should-you-avoid-walking-if-the-air-is-polluted/
Folkman S (2013) Stress: appraisal and coping. Springer, New York
Freud S (1920–22) Beyond pleasure principle group psychology and other works. Hogarth Press, London
Gehl J (1987) Life between buildings. Island Press
Gehl J (2010) Cities for people. Inland Press, Washington, Covelo and London
Godet M (1994) From anticipation to action: a handbook of strategic prospective
Harms IM, van Dijken JH (2019) Walking without awareness. Front Psychol 10
Hunter Fors CC (nd) Lighting for sidewalks, buildings, and crosswalks. Retrieved from Sustainable Development codes
Hureau A (2020) Parking spaces: Why more parking leads to a lack of parking. Accessed https://ahureau.medium.com/parking-spaces-why-more-parking-leads-to-a-lack-of-parking-edfd5d68fc27
IIED (2019) Making Indian cities inclusive means making them more walkable. International Institute for Environmental Development. https://www.iied.org/making-indian-cities-inclusive-means-making-them-more-walkable. Accessed 1 December 2022
Jacobs J (1961) Death and life of Great American cities. Random House, New York City
Jessica Chou SS (2019) Why San Francisco is putting pedestrians first on its main thoroughfare. Retrieved from Politico Magazine https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/05/23/san-francisco-transportation-transit-bike-lanes-cars-pedestrians-226922/
Karssenberg H, Laven J (2017) The city at eye level. Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft, The Netherlands
Kielar PM, Borrmann A (2016) Modeling pedestrians’ interest in locations: a concept to improve simulations of pedestrian destination choice. Simula Model Pract Theory 61:47–62
Kim EJ, Kim J (2020) Does environmental walkability matter? The role of walkable environment in active commuting. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 17(4):1261
Krier R (1993) Urban space. Rizzoli
Long YC (2017) Does block size matter? The impact of urban design on economic vitality for Chinese cities. Environment and Planning B urban analytics and city science. Accessed https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318029894_Does_block_size_matter_The_impact_of_urban_design_on_economic_vitality_for_Chinese_cities
Malone DW (1975) An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling. Proc IEEE 63(3):397–404
Mangal SK, Mangal M (2013) Research methodology in behavioural sciences. Prentice Hall India Learning Private Limited
Mascioa PD, D’Alessandro A (2020) Walking on the safe side: a methodology to assess pavement quality conditions for pedestrians. Transp Res Procedia 360–367
Mohamad S, Said I (2018) Familiarity factors of street features in pedestrian wayfindings. Int J Built Environ Sustain 201–207
Moreira FD, Rezende S, Passos F (2022) Public toilets from the perspective of users: a case study in a public place. Brazil Water Health 20(1):41–53
Murray MM (2021) These 8 cities around the world are putting their focus on biking and walking—not cars. Accessed Ted.com https://ideas.ted.com/these-cities-around-the-world-are-focusing-on-biking-and-walking-instead-of-cars/
Naik A (2022) Wizards at making a virtue of necessity’: street vendors in India. Socio-Legal Review, National Law school of India, Bangalore
Nasar JL (1997) Landscapes of fear and stress. Environ Behav 29(3):291–323
Osama A, Sayed T (2017) Evaluating impact of connectivity, continuity and topography of sidewalk network on pedestrian safety and accident analysis. Accid Anal Prevent 107:117–125
Othayoth D, KrishnaRao KV (2020) Assessing the relationship between perceived waiting time and level of service at signalized intersection under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Asian Transport Studies.
Park K, Ewing R (2019) Street life and the built environment in an auto-oriented US region. Cities 88:243–251
Patil AP, Dongre AR (2014) Emergent properties of the public realm and encroachments in the urban environment. Nexus Netw J 437–465
Pedestrian Overcrowding and Emotions in Thessaloniki, Greece (2017). The City at Eye Level https://thecityateyelevel.com/stories/pedestrian-overcrowding-and-emotions-in-thessaloniki-greece/. Accessed 21 December 2022
Rahm J (2019) Urban outdoor lighting: pedestrian perception, evaluation and behaviour in the lit environment. Lund University, Sweden
Rebecca Steinbach CP (2015) The effect of reduced street lighting on road casualties and crime in England and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analysis. J Epidemiol Commun Health.
Rome P, Mukherjee M (2013) Car parking—a perennial problem of Kolkata. Int J Sci Res (IJSR) 2583–2587
Sayyar EC (2011) Urban diversity and pedestrian behavior—refining the concept of land-use mix for walkability. In: Space syntax symposium 8: SSS8. Sweden
Schepers P, den Brinker B (2017) Pedestrian falls: a review of the literature and future research directions. J Saf Res 62:227–234
Shastry MA (2010) Spatial assessment of transit oriented development in Ahmedabad, India. PhD thesis, Ahmedabad, India
Speck J (2013) Walkable city: how downtown can save america, one step at a time. North Point Press
Speisser N, Damas C (2018) Impact of waiting times on pedestrians’ and car drivers’ behaviour. In: 7th transport research arena TRA 2018, Vienna, Austria
Spoon S (2005) What defines walkability: walking behavior correlates. Masters Thesis in Regional Planning in the Department of City and Regional Planning, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The Times of India (2022) Kolkata: survey finds encroachment in all 3 hawking zones, calls for action. The Times of India, Kolkata, December 23, 2022
Ujang N (2008) Place attachment, familiarity and sustainability of urban place identity. Enhancing Park Utilization through Assessing the Functions of Place Attachment, Putra, Malaysia
van der Bijl B, Vreeswijk J (2011) Car drivers’ perception and acceptance of waiting time at signalized intersections. In: IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA, pp 451–456
Warfield J (1974) Life and Works. Accessedhttps://warfield.gmu.edu/exhibits/show/warfield/innovator/ism
Welle B, Liu Q (nd) World Resources Institute (WRI). Retrieved from CITIES SAFER BY DESIGN| guidance and examples to promote traffic safety through urban and street design||(2.1 Block Size): https://publications.wri.org/citiessafer/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
-
(i)
appendix 1: list of factors of walkability and experience of space
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dasgupta, S., Sen, J. (2024). Why Pedestrians Do not Walk on Walkways?. In: Goswami, A.K., Aithal, B.H., Maitra, S., Banerjee, A. (eds) Infrastructure and Built Environment for Sustainable and Resilient Societies. IBSR 2023. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1503-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1503-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-1502-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-1503-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)