Abstract
A varied geographical and highly ethnicised area of the Eastern Himalaya, and the Brahmaputra Valley of the Indo-Myanmar frontier has been legitimised as India’s northeastern region. This defined territorial construct was mapped by dominant reference to international borders, boundedness, and geopolitics. Evolving political and economic geography remained paramount and sequential for the spatial and temporal specificities of the idea of the Northeast and its changing trajectories in India’s region-making process. This has largely unheeded its diverse ethno-cultural complexities, sovereign entities, cross-border ethnic-community relations, and various kinds of exchange relations, mainly in the domain of illegality. The homogenised construct of this region has been dominantly a state project from the colonial to early post-colonial to the neoliberal periods that persistently faced various contesting voices and subsequent conflicts and violence. This chapter takes the new developmental construct of the Indian state since 2014–2015 that re-validates the idea of the northeastern region as a geographical unit and entails a critical approach to revisit such a new approach of the state and its propensity to developmental construct against a contesting and conflictual reality of this region. It problematises such determinism, which is not grounded in the complex social predicament. It tends to make this regional labelling highly fragile and unsustainable in the scholarly debates and theoretical frame.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adrian, W., (2012). The visible hand, The Economist, January 21
Anbumozhi, V., Kutani, I., & Lama, M. P. (2019). Emerging connectivity between Northeast India and its neighbours. Confederation of Indian Industry
Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography., 2(2), 171–189.
Bhandar, B., & Goldenberg-Hiller, J. (2015). Staging encounters. In B. Bhandar, & J. Goldenberg-Hiller (Eds.), Plastic materialities: Politics, legality, and metamorphosis in the work of catherine Malabou (pp. 1–33). Duke University Press.
Bhattacharjee, S. (2023). Intensifying narcotic threat in the northeast. The Statesman
Bhattacharya, R., & Deka, N. (2021). Road matters at the periphery: India’s post- liberalisation road projects in the northeast. Journal of Economic and Social Development., 23(2), 321–337.
Bhattacharya, R. (2017). Insider or an outsider: Where is the Northeast in India’s act east policy? In A. Sarma, & S. Choudhury (Eds.), Mainstreaming the Northeast in India’s look and act east policy. Springer.
Bhattacharya, R. (2022). The idea of a sustained northeast in India’s transregional economic architecture. In A. B. Choudhury, & A. Ghosh (Eds.), Situating India’s Northeast in the Bay of Bengal regional architecture. Durham University, Wiley
Bhowmik, S., & Saha, R. (2021). Enhancing trade and development in India’s Northeast’, ORF Special Report. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/research/enhancing-trade-and-development-in-indias-northeast/
Buğra, A. (2017). Two lives of developmentalism: A polanyian view from Turkey. In I. Bono, & B. Hibou (Eds.), Development as a battlefield. International Development Policy Series No.8. Graduate Institute/Brill-Nijhoff
Chakraborty, A. S. (2021). Social imaginaries, minorities, and the post-colonial history of a region. In G. A. Sharma (Ed.), State vs. Society in Northeast India: History, Politics, and the Everyday (pp. 3–25). Sage Publications.
Ciută, F. (2008). Region? Why region? Security, hermeneutics, and the making of the black sea region. Geopolitics, 13(1), 120–147.
Escober, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.
Fernandes, W. (2005). Tribal customary laws and formal law interface in North East India: Implications for land relations.
Gudynas, E. (2010). El nuevo extractivismo del sigloxxi. Memoria Revista de Política y Cultura. Número, 242, 12–17.
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Blackwell.
Ji, M. (2006). Neoliberal developmentalism: State-led economic liberalisation in China [Ph.D. Thesis]. Cornell University.
Karlsson, B. G. (2011). Unruly hills: A political ecology of India’s Northeast. Berghahn Books
Khosla, M. (Ed.). (2014). Letters for a nation: From Jawaharlal Nehru to his chief ministers: 1947–1963 (pp. 58–59). Penguin India /Allen Lane.
Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialisation in the global periphery. Cambridge University Press.
Lama, M. P. (2017). Renewable agenda. The Kathmandu Post, 13 December.
Lama, M. P. (2020). Why a new development model. The Kathmandu Post, 4 October.
Malgavkar, P. D., & Ghiara, B. M. (1975). Regional development: Where and how? In L. K. Sen, (Ed.), Readings on micro-level planning and rural growth centres. National Institute of Community Development.
Martin, L., & Secor, A. J. (2013). Towards a post-mathematical topology. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 420–438.
Nee, V. (2000). The role of the state in making a market economy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 156(1).
Niti Aayog Report. (2017). Three years action agenda: 2014–15 to 2019–20. Government of India.
Paasi, A., Harrison, J., & Jones, M. (2018). Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories. Elgar.
Pereira, M. (2005). Globalisation and changing land relations in the northeast. Paper presented at seminar on The Impact of Globalisation on the Northeast. Himalayan Research Institute, Tezpur, Assam.
Planning Commission Report. (1997). Transforming the North-East. Government of India.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
Postero, N. (2017). The indigenous state: Race, politics, and performance in Plurinational Bolivia. California University Press.
Roy Burman, B. K. (1989) Problem and prospect of tribal development in North East India. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(13), 693–697.
Scott, J. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia Yale. Yale University Press.
Sharma, G. A., (ed.) (2021). State vs. society in Northeast India: History, politics and everyday. Sage Publication, pp. xxvii–xxx.
Shimray, U. A. (2004). Socio-political unrest in the region called North-East India. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(42), 4367–4643.
Siebert, H. (1969). Regional economic growth: Theory and policy. International Textbook Company.
Springer, S. (2010). Neoliberalism and geography: Expansion, variegations, formations. Geography Compass, 4(8), 1025–1038.
Thirumal, P. (2016). The making of the region: Perspectives from a non-savarna newspaper ‘(Part I). Retrieved from November 24 https://www.roundtableindia.co.in/the-making-of-the-region-perspectives-from-a-non-savarna-newspaper-part-i/
van Schendel, W. (2004). The Bengal Borderland: Beyond State and Nation in South Asia. Anthem Press.
Woods, M., Fois, F., Heley, J., Jones, L., Onyeahialam, A., Saville, S., & Welsh, M. (2021). Assemblage, place and globalisation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 46(2), 284–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhattacharya, R. (2024). The Idea of Northeast India: Contesting the Construct. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakraborty, G., Chakraborty, A.S. (eds) Indigeneity, Development and Sustainability. Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1436-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1436-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-1435-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-1436-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)