Skip to main content

An Experimental Study on Optimal Evaluation and Operational Conditions of Thermal Energy Systems in Green Building

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmental Engineering for Ecosystem Restoration (IACESD 2023)

Abstract

Currently, the building industry is focusing on the requirement for high energy utilization. It is critical to optimize energy use by utilizing renewable resources. The use of phase-change materials in thermal energy storage systems is gaining popularity in passive applications for green buildings due to their innovative approach. The proposed work focuses on the incorporation of MWCNT additive sodium poly acrylate as PCM materials into the walls, panels, and roofs of passive structures, as well as the assessment of optimal energy consumption in green buildings via indoor environmental quality (IEQ). A novel framework was developed using the response surface method and the hill climbing technique to identify the most efficient use of energy output, charging time, and heat transfer rate based on the input phase such as input air condition temperature (25–28 °C), air conditioner flow rate (100–600 cfm) and relative humidity (35–55%). According to the results, the optimal energy transfer rate of the PCM wall was found to be 53.86 during a charging duration of 39 min. The amount of thermal energy stored by the PCM wall to maintain the room temperature of 26 degrees Celsius was discovered to be 15,400 kJ. This energy is adequate to keep the room temperature stable for 3 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Polo-Labarrios MA et al (2020) Comparison of thermal performance between green roofs and conventional roofs. Case Stud Therm Eng, 21:100697. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2020.100697

  2. Schade J et al (2021) The thermal performance of a green roof on a highly insulated building in a sub-arctic climate. Energy and Buildings, 241:110961. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110961

  3. Vijayan DS et al (2022) Thermal performance of energy-efficient buildings for sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 29(34): 51130–51142. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17602-3

  4. Geng Y et al (2019) A review of operating performance in green buildings: energy use, indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction. Energy Build, 183:500–514. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017

  5. Kevern JT (2011) Green building and sustainable infrastructure: sustainability education for civil engineers. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract, 137(2):107–12. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000048

  6. Chrysanidis T (2023) A case of lateral buckling under seismic action using a prism column specimen. Struct Eng Int 33(1):125–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2021.2003741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu P, Low SP (2010) Project management and green buildings: lessons from the rating systems. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract, 136(2):64–70. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000006

  8. Windapo A et al (2021) Use and performance of conventional and sustainable building technologies in low-income housing. Sustain Cities Soc, 65:102606. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102606

  9. Vijayan DS (2023) A review on eminent application and performance of nano based silica and silica fume in the cement concrete. Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 56:103105. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103105

  10. Rodi, W.N.W et al. (2015) Depreciation between Conventional and green office buildings. Procedia Econ Financ, 31:661–670. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01154-5

  11. Wong L et al. (2020) Energy performance evaluation and comparison of sampled brazilian bank buildings with the existing and proposed energy rating systems. Energy Build., 225:110304. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110304

  12. Blanco I, Convertino F (2023) Thermal performance of green façades: research trends analysis using a science mapping approach. Sustain, 15(13):9981. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139981

  13. Chrysanidis T (2023) Experimental and numerical research on cracking characteristics of medium-reinforced prisms under variable uniaxial degrees of elongation. Eng Fail Anal, 145. 107014, ISSN 1350-6307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.107014

  14. Gibson GE et al. (1995) Preproject-planning process for capital facilities. J Constr Eng Manag, 121(3):312–318. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:3(312)

  15. Kylili A, Fokaides PA (2015) European smart cities: the role of zero energy buildings. Sustain Cities Soc, 15:86–95. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.003

  16. Han J et al. (2009) A comparative analysis of urban and rural residential thermal comfort under natural ventilation environment. Energy and Buildings, 41(2):139–45. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.08.005

  17. Takoradi Technical University, Department of Building Technology. Takoradi, GHANA, et al. (2019) Factors affecting the capacity of small to medium enterprises (sme) building construction firms in Ghana. J Constr Dev Ctries, 24(1):49–63. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.3

  18. Das O (2015) Water conservation aspects of green buildings. Int J Adv Res, 04(25):75–79. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2015.0425012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Vijayan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baskar, N., Vijayan, D.S., Parthiban, D., Kumar, R.S., Sivasuriyan, A., Barik, I. (2024). An Experimental Study on Optimal Evaluation and Operational Conditions of Thermal Energy Systems in Green Building. In: Vinod Chandra Menon, N., Kolathayar, S., Sreekeshava, K.S. (eds) Environmental Engineering for Ecosystem Restoration. IACESD 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 464. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0910-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0910-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0909-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0910-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics