Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Solid and Liquid Waste Management in Urban and Rural Areas: Current Practices and Future Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Waste Management

  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

Solid and liquid waste management is critical to environmental sustainability and public health in urban and rural areas. This chapter overviews the various techniques and applications employed in managing waste in these diverse settings. In urban areas, the exponential growth of populations has led to an ever-increasing volume of waste, necessitating innovative solutions. The primary techniques include source segregation, recycling, and waste-to-energy conversion. Source segregation encourages residents to separate their waste into categories, making it easier to recycle and manage. Recycling programs are gaining prominence, diverting materials such as paper, plastic, and glass from landfills. Waste-to-energy facilities are also increasingly utilized, converting non-recyclable waste into electricity and heat, thereby reducing the burden on landfills. Conversely, rural areas face distinct challenges in waste management. The techniques applied in these regions focus on simplicity and sustainability. Open dumping and uncontrolled disposal have been common practices, but they are unsustainable and pose environmental hazards. Rural communities often implement community-based composting and organic farming techniques, utilizing biodegradable waste to enrich agricultural soil. Furthermore, decentralized waste management systems, such as biogas production from organic waste, offer dual benefits of waste reduction and clean energy generation, contributing to self-sufficiency in energy. This chapter also explores the crucial role of technological advancements in waste management. In urban areas, the use of smart bins, sensor-based monitoring, and data analytics optimizes waste collection routes, reducing operational costs and environmental impact. In rural areas, low-cost innovations like low-tech biodigesters for biogas generation are instrumental in reducing waste-related challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. (2022) Solid waste management. In: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management

  2. Chhay L, Reyad MAH, Suy R, Islam MR, Mian MM (2018) Municipal solid waste generation in China: influencing factor analysis and multi-model forecasting. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20:1761–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0743-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mian MM, Zeng X, Nasry A al N Bin, Al-Hamadani SMZF (2017) Municipal solid waste management in China: a comparative analysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0509-9

  4. Khan S, Naushad M, Lima EC, Zhang S, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J (2021) Global soil pollution by toxic elements: current status and future perspectives on the risk assessment and remediation strategies – a review. J Hazard Mater 417:126039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126039

  5. Nanda S, Berruti F (2021) Municipal solid waste management and landfilling technologies: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:1433–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01100-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashem AH, Hasanin M, Kamel S, Dacrory S (2022) A new approach for antimicrobial and antiviral activities of biocompatible nanocomposite based on cellulose, amino acid and graphene oxide. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 209:112172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang S, Yu Z, Ma X, Lin Y, Chen L, Liao Y (2018) Analysis of catalytic pyrolysis of municipal solid waste and paper sludge using TG-FTIR, Py-GC/MS and DAEM (distributed activation energy model). Energy 143:517–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.038

  8. Ghosh P, Shah G, Chandra R, Sahota S, Kumar H, Vijay VK, Thakur IS (2019) Assessment of methane emissions and energy recovery potential from the municipal solid waste landfills of Delhi, India. Bioresour Technol 272:611–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.069

  9. Jensen PE, Hennessy TW, Kallenborn R (2018) Water, sanitation, pollution, and health in the Arctic. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:32827–32830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3388-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Siebel MA, Rotter VS, Nabende A, Gupta J (2013) Clean development mechanism: a way to sustainable waste management in developing countries? Osterr Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft 65:42–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-012-0052-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke CS, Salas E, Smith-Jentsch K, Rosen MA (2012) Measuring macrocognition in teams: some insights for navigating the complexities. Macrocogn Metr Scenar Des Eval Real-World Teams 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315593173-4

  12. Venkata Mohan S, Nikhil GN, Chiranjeevi P, Nagendranatha Reddy C, Rohit M V, Kumar AN, Sarkar O (2016) Waste biorefinery models towards sustainable circular bioeconomy: Critical review and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 215:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.130

  13. Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU (2014) Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent – a critical review. Bioresour Technol 160:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120

  14. Mara D (2009) Waste stabilization ponds: past, present and future. Desalin Water Treat 4:85–88. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dillon PJ, Schrale G (1993) Wastewater irrigation and groundwater quality protection

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeong H, Kim H, Jang T (2016) Irrigation water quality standards for indirect wastewater reuse in agriculture: a contribution toward sustainable wastewater reuse in South Korea. Water 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040169

  17. Foster W, Azimov U, Gauthier-Maradei P, Molano LC, Combrinck M, Munoz J, Esteves JJ, Patino L (2021) Waste-to-energy conversion technologies in the UK: Processes and barriers – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 135:110226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110226

  18. Shindhal T, Rakholiya P, Varjani S, Pandey A, Ngo HH, Guo W, Ng HY, Taherzadeh MJ (2021) A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered 12:70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1863034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Liu J (2021) Mechanism and dynamic evolution of leachate collection system clogging in MSW landfills in China. Waste Manag 120:314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.057

  20. Scaglia B, Confalonieri R, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2010) Estimating biogas production of biologically treated municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol 101:945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.085

  21. Sohoo I, Ritzkowski M, Sultan M, Farooq M, Kuchta K (2022) Conceptualization of Bioreactor landfill approach for sustainable waste management in Karachi, Pakistan. Sustainability 14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Joseph AM, Snellings R, Van den Heede P, Matthys S, De Belie N (2018) The use of municipal solid waste incineration Ash in various building materials: A Belgian point of view. Materials (Basel). 11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Adetunji CO, Panpatte DG Microbial Rejuvenation of Polluted Environment

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar K (2011) Influence of ultrasonic treatment in Sewage Sludge. J Waste Water Treat Anal 02. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7587.1000115

  25. Więckol-Ryk A, Krzemień A, Smoliński A, Lasheras FS (2018) Analysis of biomass blend Co-firing for post combustion CO2 Capture. Sustainability 10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kanhar AH, Chen S, Wang F (2020) Incineration fly ash and its treatment to possible utilization: a review. Energies 13

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sansaniwal SK, Pal K, Rosen MA, Tyagi SK (2017) Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:363–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.038

  28. Montiel-Bohórquez ND, Agudelo AF, Pérez JF (2021) Effect of origin and production rate of MSW on the exergoeconomic performance of an integrated plasma gasification combined cycle power plant. Energy Convers Manag 238:114138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114138

  29. Materazzi M, Lettieri P, Mazzei L, Taylor R, Chapman C (2013) Thermodynamic modelling and evaluation of a two-stage thermal process for waste gasification. Fuel 108:356–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037

  30. Gupta P, Diwan B (2017) Bacterial Exopolysaccharide mediated heavy metal removal: a review on biosynthesis, mechanism and remediation strategies. Biotechnol Reports 13:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2016.12.006

  31. Hesnawi R, Dahmani K, Al-Swayah A, Mohamed S, Mohammed SA (2014) Biodegradation of municipal wastewater with local and commercial bacteria. Procedia Eng 70:810–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.088

  32. Sharma M, Agarwal S, Agarwal Malik R, Kumar G, Pal DB, Mandal M, Sarkar A, Bantun F, Haque S, Singh P, Srivastava N, Gupta VK (2023) Recent advances in microbial engineering approaches for wastewater treatment: a review. Bioengineered 14:2184518. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2023.2184518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang J-S, Chou C, Lin Y-C, Lin P-J, Ho J-Y, Lee Hu T (2001) Kinetic characteristics of bacterial azo-dye decolorization by Pseudomonas luteola. Water Res 35:2841–2850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00581-9

  34. Ghosh D, Ghorai P, Sarkar S, Maiti KS, Hansda SR, Das P (2023) Microbial assemblage for solid waste bioremediation and valorization with an essence of bioengineering. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:16797–16816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24849-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rebosura M, Salehin S, Pikaar I, Kulandaivelu J, Jiang G, Keller J, Sharma K, Yuan Z (2020) Effects of in-sewer dosing of iron-rich drinking water sludge on wastewater collection and treatment systems. Water Res 171:115396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115396

  36. Kumar A, Samadder SR (2020) Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: a review. Energy 197:117253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117253

  37. Afolalu SA, Ikumapayi OM, Ogedengbe TS, Kazeem RA, Ogundipe AT (2022) Waste pollution, wastewater and effluent treatment methods – an overview. Mater Today Proc 62:3282–3288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.231

  38. Lei Z, Yang S, Li Y, Wen W, Wang XC, Chen R (2018) Application of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to municipal wastewater treatment at ambient temperature: a review of achievements, challenges, and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 267:756–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.050

  39. Yurtsever A, Calimlioglu B, Sahinkaya E (2017) Impact of SRT on the efficiency and microbial community of sequential anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of textile industry wastewater. Chem Eng J 314:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.156

  40. Brennan RB, Clifford E, Devroedt C, Morrison L, Healy MG (2017) Treatment of landfill leachate in municipal wastewater treatment plants and impacts on effluent ammonium concentrations. J Environ Manage 188:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.055

  41. Veluchamy C, Kalamdhad AS (2017) Influence of pretreatment techniques on anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill sludge: a review. Bioresour Technol 245:1206–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.179

  42. Patwa A, Parde D, Dohare D, Vijay R, Kumar R (2020) Solid waste characterization and treatment technologies in rural areas: an Indian and international review. Environ Technol Innov 20:101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101066

  43. Vuković A, Velki M, Ečimović S, Vuković R, Štolfa Čamagajevac I, Lončarić Z (2021) Vermicomposting—facts, benefits and knowledge gaps. Agronomy 11

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ali U, Sajid N, Khalid A, Riaz L, Rabbani MM, Syed JH, Malik RN (2015) A review on vermicomposting of organic wastes. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 34:1050–1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12100

  45. Fajfrlíková P, Brunerová A, Roubík H (2020) Analyses of waste treatment in rural areas of east Java with the possibility of low-pressure briquetting press application. Sustainability 12

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vinti G, Vaccari M (2022) Solid waste management in rural communities of developing countries: an overview of challenges and opportunities. Clean Technol 4:1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4040069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kesari K, Jamal Q (2017) Review processing, properties and applications of agricultural solid waste: effect of an open burning in environmental toxicology. In: Environmental Science and Engineering (Subseries: Environmental Science). pp 161–181

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang H, Wang S, Zhang J, Tian C, Luo S (2021) Biochar application enhances microbial interactions in mega-aggregates of farmland black soil. Soil Tillage Res 213:105145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105145

  49. Bai N, Zhang H, Zhou S, Sun H, Zhao Y, Zheng X, Li S, Zhang J, Lv W (2020) Long-term effects of straw return and straw-derived biochar amendment on bacterial communities in soil aggregates. Sci Rep 10:7891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64857-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang Z, Wang J, Liu L, Ma J, Shen B (2020) Preparation of additive-free glass-ceramics from MSW incineration bottom ash and coal fly ash. Constr Build Mater 254:119345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119345

  51. Kumari P, Kumar A (2023) Advanced oxidation process: a remediation technique for organic and non-biodegradable pollutant. Resul Surf Interf 11:100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2023.100122

  52. Oturan MA, Aaron J-J (2014) Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater treatment: principles and applications. a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2577–2641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.829765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yaqoob M, Folgado Biot B, Nabi A, Worsfold PJ (2012) Determination of nitrate and nitrite in freshwaters using flow-injection with luminol chemiluminescence detection. Luminescence 27:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.1366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Martínez SB, Pérez-Parra J, Suay R (2011) Use of ozone in wastewater treatment to produce water suitable for irrigation. Water Resour Manag 25:2109–2124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9798-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kesari KK, Verma HN, Behari J (2011) Physical methods in wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Technol Manag 14:43–66. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2011.039257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kesari KK, Behari J (2008) Ultrasonic impact on bacterial population in sewage sample. Int J Environ Waste Manag 2:233–244. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2008.018245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

    Anirudh Pratap Singh Raman, Mohd Aslam & Prashant Singh

  2. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, NCR Campus, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, UP, India

    Anirudh Pratap Singh Raman, Mohd Aslam, Garima Pandey & Pallavi Jain

  3. Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

    Kamlesh Kumari

Authors
  1. Anirudh Pratap Singh Raman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohd Aslam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prashant Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Garima Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pallavi Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kamlesh Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Prashant Singh or Kamlesh Kumari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Technology Bhavan, Delhi, India

    Akanksha Gupta

  2. Department of Chemistry, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India

    Ravinder Kumar

  3. Special Centre for Nano Science, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi, India

    Vinod Kumar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raman, A.P.S., Aslam, M., Singh, P., Pandey, G., Jain, P., Kumari, K. (2024). Solid and Liquid Waste Management in Urban and Rural Areas: Current Practices and Future Perspectives. In: Gupta, A., Kumar, R., Kumar, V. (eds) Integrated Waste Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0823-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation