Abstract
With the advent of modern wireless communication standards, it becomes a common scenario that images and videos are transmitted more often in our day-to-day applications. However, images and videos consume a large bandwidth if transmitted uncompressed. In many cases after compression and transmission through channels, the quality of the images and videos often gets deteriorated. Now, some applications require a considerable amount of image quality for better understanding and interpretation, e.g., transmission of medical images. The present standards have certain limitations in that, particularly if the noise is associated with images. With this paper we compared four image compression approaches JPEG, autoencoder, VGG, and vision transformer (ViT) for standard images and standard images with introduced Gaussian noise and CIFAR10 datasets. This paper consists of two parts, the first part gives general overview of JPEG which are still in use, being a benchmark for every compression algorithm since they are the foundation of image compression algorithms and then recent trends like compression using deep learning which includes autoencoder, neural network-based compression like VGG and the transformer-based compression like ViT which are trending and are giving more promising results. The second part consists of the comparison of these four approaches, calculating their MSE, PSNR and Compression Ratio using CIFAR10 datasets, standard images and standard image with introduced Gaussian noise to get better and promising results of image compression maintaining its quality. Thus, among all four approaches, ViT and VGG give the best compression ratio for standard images and CIFAR datasets, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ZainEldin H, Elhosseini MA, Ali HA (2015) Image compression algorithms in wireless multimedia sensor networks: a survey. Ain Shams Eng J 6(2):481–490
Dhawan S (2011) A review of image compression and comparison of its algorithms. Int J Electron Commun Technol 2(1):22–26
Yasin HM, Abdulazeez AM (2021) Image compression based on deep learning: a review. Asian J Res Comput Sci 8(1):62–76
Vijayvargiya G, Silakari S, Pandey R (2013) A survey: various techniques of image compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.6877
Pokle PB, Bawane NG (2013) Comparative study of various image compression techniques. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(5)
Hajar MY. Image compression based on deep learning: a review
Parmar CK, Pancholi K (2015) A review on image compression techniques. J Inf Knowl Res Electr Eng 2(2):281–284
Kaur R, Choudhary P (2016) A review of image compression techniques. Int J Comput Appl 142(1):8–11
Patel MI, Suthar S, Thakar J (2019) Survey on image compression using machine learning and deep learning. In: 2019 international conference on intelligent computing and control systems (ICCS). IEEE, pp 1103–1105
Han K, Wang Y, Chen H, Chen X, Guo J, Liu Z, Tang Y, Xiao A, Xu C, Xu Y, Yang Z(2022) A survey on vision transformer. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 45(1):87–110.
Wallace GK (1992) The JPEG still picture compression standard. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 38(1):xviii–xxxiv
Christopoulos C, Skodras A, Ebrahimi T (2000) The JPEG2000 still image coding system: an overview. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 46(4):1103–1127
Abd-Alzhra AS, Al-Tamimi MS (2022) Image compression using deep learning: methods and techniques. Iraqi J Sci 1299–1312
Kovenko V, Bogach І (2020) A comprehensive study of autoencoders applications related to images. In: International conference “information technology and interactions” (IT&I-2020). Workshops proceedings, Kyiv, Ukraine, 02–03 Dec 2020. Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, pp 43–54
Ameen Suhail KM, Sankar S (2020) Image compression and encryption combining autoencoder and chaotic logistic map. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A: Sci 44:1091–1100
Khan M, Jan B, Farman H (2019) Deep learning: convergence to big data analytics. Springer, Singapore, pp 31–42
Zhang Y (2018) A better autoencoder for image: convolutional autoencoder. In: ICONIP17-DCEC. Available at: http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/Tom.Gedeon/conf/ABCs2018/paper/ABCs2018_paper_58.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2017
https://viso.ai/deep-learning/vgg-very-deep-convolutional-networks/
Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556
Islam K (2022) Recent advances in vision transformer: a survey and outlook of recent work. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01536
Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, Houlsby N (2020) An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929
Khan S, Naseer M, Hayat M, Zamir SW, Khan FS, Shah M (2022) Transformers in vision: a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54(10s):1–41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Akhter, S., Raj, R., Subadar, R., Dutta, S.K. (2024). Comparison of Four Approaches of Image Compression for Wireless Communication. In: Bhateja, V., Chowdary, P.S.R., Flores-Fuentes, W., Urooj, S., Sankar Dhar, R. (eds) Evolution in Signal Processing and Telecommunication Networks. ICMEET 2023. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1155. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0644-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0644-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0643-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0644-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)