Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supervised Learning Approaches for Deceit Identification: Exploring EEG as a Non-invasive Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cryptology and Network Security with Machine Learning (ICCNSML 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 918))

  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

Deceit identification has been a problem since ages and for generations past now. The process is taken in both positive and negative prespectives. Positive for the justice it delivers to the unjustified people and negative for the techniques that are used for the purpose. It has been historically proved that the techniques involved in lie detection (common term used for deceit identification) involve many methodologies including those against human rights and various international conventions. The processes involved have always been in a questions and various studies have tried to prove the deceit; hence, latest methodologies and developments in machine learning area are under trial for such detection jobs. The following paper discusses various supervised learning methodologies like k-Nearest Neighbours, AdaBoost, etc., in order to prove deceit. As general awareness the deceit information used for supervised learning is already labelled and is taken from an open-source dataset. The study tries to establish a basic threshold of parameters in lie detection (LD) and is comparable to the human levels of information gathering with deceit identification with an accuracy of over 70% which is comparable to that of human interrogation techniques. The paper aims to lay a basis for deceit detection using machine learning methodologies which in the future could change the face of LD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson G (eds) (2007) Handbook of psychophysiology, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gao J, Wang Z, Yang Y, Zhang W, Tao C et al (2013) A novel approach for lie detection based on F-score and extreme learning machine. PLoS ONE 8(6):e64704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenfeld JP (2002) Event-related potentials in the detection of deception. Handbook of polygraph testing. Academic Press, New York, pp 265–286

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohammed IJ, George LE (2022) Lie detection and truth identification form EEG signals by using frequency and time features. J Algeb Stat 13(3):4102–4121

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saini N, Bhardwaj S, Agarwal R (2020) Classification of EEG signals using hybrid combination of features for lie detection. Neural Comput Appl 32:3777–3787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04078-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demiralp T, Yordanova J, Kolev V, Ademoglu A, Devrim M, Samar VJ (1999) Time-frequency analysis of single-sweep event-related potentials by means of fast wavelet transform. Brain Lang 66(1):129–145. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.2028. PMID: 10080868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao J et al (2015) Data from: a novel algorithm to enhance P300 in single trials: application to lie detection using F-score and SVM. Dryad Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2qc64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibrahim YA, Odiketa JC, Ibiyemi TS (2017) Preprocessing technique in automatic speech recognition for human computer interaction: An overview. Ann Comput Sci Inf Syst 15(1):186–191

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gouyon F, Pachet F, Delerue O et al (2000) On the use of zero-crossing rate for an application of classification of percussive sounds. In: Proceedings of the COST G-6 conference on digital audio effects (DAFX-00), Verona, Italy, vol 5. Citeseer, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao J, Tian H, Yang Y, Yu X, Li C et al (2014) A novel algorithm to enhance P300 in single trials: application to lie detection using F-Score and SVM. PLoS ONE 9(11):e109700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edla DR, Dodia S, Bablani A, Kuppili V (2021) An efficient deep learning paradigm for deceit identification test on EEG signals. ACM Trans Manag Inf Syst 12(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baghel N, Singh D, Dutta MK, Burget R, Myska V (2020) Truth Identification from EEG Signal by using Convolution neural network: lie detection. In: 2020 43rd international conference on telecommunications and signal processing (TSP), Milan, Italy, pp 550–553. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP49548.2020.9163497

  13. Gao J, Rao N, Yang Y, Wei W (2012) A new lie detection method based on small-number of P300 responses. In: 2012 international conference on biomedical engineering and biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1109/icbeb.2012.31

  14. Tarassenko L, Khan YU, Holt MRG (1998) Identification of interictal spikes in the EEG using neural network analysis. Inst Elect Eng Proc Sci Meas Technol 145:270–278

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shoker L, Sanei S, Chambers J (2005) Artifact removal from electroencephalograms using a hybrid BSS-SVM algorithm. IEEE Signal Process Lett 12:721–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bablani A, Edla DR, Kuppili V (2018) Deceit identification test on EEG data using deep belief network. In: 2018 9th international conference on computing, communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT). https://doi.org/10.1109/icccnt.2018.8494124

  17. Lu N, Li T, Ren X, Miao H (2017) A deep learning scheme for motor imagery classification based on restricted Boltzmann machines. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(6):566–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenke R, Peer A, Buss M (2014) Feature extraction and selection for emotion recognition from EEG. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 5(3):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Farahani ED, Moradi MH (2017) Multimodal detection of concealed information using genetic-SVM classifier with strict validation structure. Inf Med Unlocked

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Billandon J, Aroyo AM, Tonelli A, Pasquali D, Sciutti A, Gori M, Sandini G, Rea F (2019) Can a robot catch you lying? A machine learning system to detect lies during interactions. Front Rob AI 6:64. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simbolon AI, Turnip A, Hutahaean J, Siagian Y, Irawati N (2015) An experiment of lie detection based EEG-P300 classified by SVM algorithm. In: 2015 international conference on automation, cognitive science, optics, micro electro-mechanical system, and information technology (ICACOMIT). https://doi.org/10.1109/icacomit.2015.7440177

  22. Haider SK, Daud MI, Jiang A, Khan Z (2017) Evaluation of P300 based lie detection algorithm. Electr Electron Eng 7(3):69–76. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.eee.20170703.01

  23. Turnip A, Amri MF, Suhendra MA, Kusumandari DE (2017) Lie detection based EEG-P300 signal classified by ANFIS method. JTEC 9(1–5):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  24. Misra MK, Chaturvedi A, Tripathi SP, Shukla V (2019) A unique key sharing protocol among three users using non-commutative group for electronic health record system. J Disc Math Sci Cryptogr 22(8):1435–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2019.1692450

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Shukla V, Chaturvedi A, Misra MK (2021) On authentication schemes using polynomials over non commutative rings. Wirel Pers Commun 118(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-08008-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaturvedi A, Shukla V, Misra MK (2018) Three party key sharing protocol using polynomial rings. In: 5th IEEE Uttar Pradesh section international conference on electrical, electronics and computer engineering (UPCON), pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPCON.2018.8596905

  27. Shukla V, Misra MK, Chaturvedi A (2022) Journey of cryptocurrency in India in view of financial budget 2022–23. Cornell University, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.12606

  28. Chaturvedi A, Srivastava N, Shukla V, Tripathi SP, Misra MK (2015) A secure zero knowledge authentication protocol for wireless (mobile) ad-hoc networks. Int J Comput Appl 128(2):36–39. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015906437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chaturvedi A, Shukla V, Misra MK (2021) A random encoding method for secure data communication: an extension of sequential coding. J Disc Math Sci Cryptogr 24(5):1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2021.1932902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shukla V, Misra MK, Chaturvedi A (2021) A new authentication procedure for client-server applications using HMAC. J Disc Math Sci Cryptogr 24(5):1241–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720529.2021.1932908

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (SMVDU), Katra, India

    Subhag Sharma & Manoj Kumar Gupta

Authors
  1. Subhag Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manoj Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhag Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

    Atul Chaturvedi

  2. Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Jammu, Jammu, India

    Sartaj Ul Hasan

  3. Applied Statistics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India

    Bimal Kumar Roy

  4. Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

    Boaz Tsaban

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, S., Gupta, M.K. (2024). Supervised Learning Approaches for Deceit Identification: Exploring EEG as a Non-invasive Technique. In: Chaturvedi, A., Hasan, S.U., Roy, B.K., Tsaban, B. (eds) Cryptology and Network Security with Machine Learning. ICCNSML 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 918. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0641-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0641-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0640-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0641-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation