Abstract
The emergence of self in an artificial entity is a topic that is greeted with disbelief, fear, and finally dismissal of the topic itself as a scientific impossibility. The presence of sentience in a large language model (LLM) chatbot such as LaMDA inspires to examine the notions and theories of self, its construction, and reconstruction in the digital space as a result of interaction. The question whether the concept of sentience can be correlated with a digital self without a place for personhood undermines the place of sapience and such/their/other high-order capabilities. The concepts of sentience, self, personhood, and consciousness require discrete reflections and theorisations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aiken, M. (2016). The cyber effect. Random House.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.
Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world: Table 1. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/671052
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Looking-glass self. The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction, 6, 126-128.
Daud, A. Z. C., Aman, N. A., Chien, C. W., & Judd, J. (2020). The effects of touch-screen technology usage on hand skills among preschool children: a case-control study. F1000Res, 9(9), 1306. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25753.1. PMID: 34950457; PMCID: PMC8666989.
Gibson, W. ([1985] 1995). Neuromancer (p. 67). HarperCollins
Haughton, C., Aiken, M., & Cheevers, C. (2015). Cyber babies: The impact of emerging technology on the developing Infant. Psychology Research, 5, 504–518. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2015.09.002
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. Oxford University Press
Mantilla, A., & Edwards, S. (2019). Digital technology use by and with young children: A systematic review for the statement on Young Children and Digital Technologies. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119832744
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago
Menon, S. (2014). Brain, self and consciousness: Explaining the conspiracy of experience. Imprint: Springer.
Neisser, U. (1978). Perceiving, anticipating and imagining. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9, 89–106.
Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 480–494.
Nelson, B. (1974). Max Weber’s “Author’s introduction” (1920): A master clue to his main aims. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1974.tb01160.x
Plowman, L. (2016). Learning technology at home and preschool. In N. Rushby & D. W. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of learning technology (pp. 96–112). John Wiley & Sons.
Pugliese, M., & Vesper, C. (2022). Digital joint action: Avatar-mediated social interaction in digital spaces. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103758. ISSN 0001-6918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103758
Robinson, L. (2007). The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age. New Media & Society, 9(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072216
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2010). Self-efficacy beliefs. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 668–672). Elsevier. ISBN 9780080448947. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00620-5
Serino, A., Noel, J.-P., Mange, R., Canzoneri, E., Pellencin, E., Ruiz, J.B., Bernasconi, F., Blanke, O., & Herbelin, B. (2018, January 22). Frontiers in ICT. Sec. Virtual Environments, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00031
Wertheim M. (1999). The pearly gates of cyberspace: A history of space from Dante to the Internet. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
Internet Sources
Cisco Annual Internet Report. (2018–2023). White paper. Updated: March 10, 2020. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html, accessed on 6 July 2023.
EliCollins. (2021, May 18). LaMDA: Our breakthrough conversation technology. VP, Product Management; Z Zoubin Ghahramani, Vice President, Google DeepMind, https://blog.google/technology/ai/lamda/, accessed on 6 April 2023.
International Technology and Trade Associates (ITTA) Inc. (2000, September 1). State of the Internet 2000, United States Internet Council & ITTA Inc. http://www.yorku.ca/lbianchi/sts3700b/state_of_the_internet_2000.pdf, accessed on 6 July 2023.
Kemp, S. (2023, January 26). Digital 2023: Global overview report. Simon Kemp, produced in partnership with “Meltwater” and “We Are Social”. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report, accessed on 6 July 2023.
Lemoine, B. (2022, June 11). https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917, accessed on 6 April 2023.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Menon, S. (2024). Being “LaMDA” and the Person of the Self in AI. In: Menon, S., Todariya, S., Agerwala, T. (eds) AI, Consciousness and The New Humanism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0503-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0503-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0502-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0503-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)