Skip to main content

Being “LaMDA” and the Person of the Self in AI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
AI, Consciousness and The New Humanism
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

The emergence of self in an artificial entity is a topic that is greeted with disbelief, fear, and finally dismissal of the topic itself as a scientific impossibility. The presence of sentience in a large language model (LLM) chatbot such as LaMDA inspires to examine the notions and theories of self, its construction, and reconstruction in the digital space as a result of interaction. The question whether the concept of sentience can be correlated with a digital self without a place for personhood undermines the place of sapience and such/their/other high-order capabilities. The concepts of sentience, self, personhood, and consciousness require discrete reflections and theorisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aiken, M. (2016). The cyber effect. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world: Table 1. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/671052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Looking-glass self. The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction, 6, 126-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daud, A. Z. C., Aman, N. A., Chien, C. W., & Judd, J. (2020). The effects of touch-screen technology usage on hand skills among preschool children: a case-control study. F1000Res, 9(9), 1306. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25753.1. PMID: 34950457; PMCID: PMC8666989.

  • Gibson, W. ([1985] 1995). Neuromancer (p. 67). HarperCollins

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, C., Aiken, M., & Cheevers, C. (2015). Cyber babies: The impact of emerging technology on the developing Infant. Psychology Research, 5, 504–518. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2015.09.002

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantilla, A., & Edwards, S. (2019). Digital technology use by and with young children: A systematic review for the statement on Young Children and Digital Technologies. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119832744

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. (2014). Brain, self and consciousness: Explaining the conspiracy of experience. Imprint: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1978). Perceiving, anticipating and imagining. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (1974). Max Weber’s “Author’s introduction” (1920): A master clue to his main aims. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1974.tb01160.x

  • Plowman, L. (2016). Learning technology at home and preschool. In N. Rushby & D. W. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of learning technology (pp. 96–112). John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, M., & Vesper, C. (2022). Digital joint action: Avatar-mediated social interaction in digital spaces. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103758. ISSN 0001-6918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103758

  • Robinson, L. (2007). The cyberself: The self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age. New Media & Society, 9(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807072216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2010). Self-efficacy beliefs. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 668–672). Elsevier. ISBN 9780080448947. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00620-5

  • Serino, A., Noel, J.-P., Mange, R., Canzoneri, E., Pellencin, E., Ruiz, J.B., Bernasconi, F., Blanke, O., & Herbelin, B. (2018, January 22). Frontiers in ICT. Sec. Virtual Environments, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00031

  • Wertheim M. (1999). The pearly gates of cyberspace: A history of space from Dante to the Internet. New York: W. W. Norton & Company

    Google Scholar 

Internet Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangeetha Menon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Menon, S. (2024). Being “LaMDA” and the Person of the Self in AI. In: Menon, S., Todariya, S., Agerwala, T. (eds) AI, Consciousness and The New Humanism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0503-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics