Abstract
The human experience of warfare is changing with the introduction of AI in the field of advance weapon technology. Particularly, in the last five years, autonomous weapon system (AWS) has generated intense debate globally over the potential benefit and potential problems associated with these systems. Military planners understand that AWS can perform the most difficult and complex tasks, with or without human interference and, therefore, can significantly reduce military casualties and save costs. These systems act as force multipliers to counter security threats. On the other hand, political pundits and public intellectuals opine that AWS, without human control, can lead to highly problematic ethical and legal consequences, and some even claiming that it is unethical to allow machines control the life and death of a human being. Several prominent public intellectuals, including influential figures like Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak called for banning of “offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control”. But on the contrary, the militaries believe that the AWS can perform better without human control and follow legal and ethical rules better than soldiers. The debate over the AWS is a continuous one. This chapter will look into the emergence of AWS, its future potential and how it will impact future war scenarios, focussing thereby on the debate over the ethical–legal use of AWS and the viewpoints of military planners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arkin, R. (2010). The case for ethical autonomy in unmanned systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 9(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2010.536402
Article 36. (2013). Killer robots: UK government policy on fully autonomous weapons. https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Policy_Paper1.pdf. Accessed Oct 06, 2022.
Asaro, P. (2012). On banning autonomous weapon systems: Human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making. International Review of the Red Cross, IRRC No., 886, 687–709.
Board, D. S. (2016). Autonomy. Defense Science Board.
Bowden, L. (1985, October). The story of IFF (identification friend or foe). IEE Proceedings.
Bowden, L. (1985). The story of IFF (Identification Friend or Foe). In IEE Proceedings (Vol. 132, No. Pt. A, pp. 435–437) October 6. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.
Cesur, R., Sabia, J. J., & Tekin , E. (2011, August). The psychological costs of war: military combat and mental health. The Digest, IZA Discussion Paper No. 5615(8).
Department of Defense. (2009). FY 2009–2034 unmanned systems integrated roadmap. Department of Defense.
de Sio, F. S., & van den Hoven, J. (2018). Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: a philosophical account. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 15 Feb 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015
Editorial, NY Times. (2016, July 12). When-police-use-lethal-robots. Retrieved from The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/opinion/when-police-use-lethal-robots.html
Freedberg, J.R., S. J. (2022, November 11). JAIC chief asks: Can AI prevent another 1914? Retrieved from Breaking Defense: https://breakingdefense.com/2020/11/jaic-chief-asks-can-ai-prevent-another-1914/
Gorrell, R., MacPhail, A., & Rice, J. (2016). Countering A2/AD with swarming. Air Command and Staff College Air University.
Hambling, D. (2022, December 11). U.S. to equip MQ-9 reaper drones with artificial intelligence. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2020/12/11/new-project-will-give-us-mq-9-reaper-drones-artificial-intelligence/?sh=51dddd687a8e
Human Rights Watch. (2016, April 11). Killer robots and the concept of meaningful human control. Retrieved from Human Rights Watch: https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/04/11/killer-robots-and-concept-meaningful-human-control
Industry Spotlight. (2021, September 13). Enhancing electronic support to achieve spectrum dominance within multi-domain operations. Retrieved from Shephard: https://www.shephardmedia.com/news/digital-battlespace/enhancing-electronic-support-achieve-spectrum-domi/
Melzer, N. (2008, December). Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 90(872).
Morgan, F. E., Boudreaux, B., Lohn, A. J., Ashby, M., Curriden, C., Klima, K., Grossman, D. (2020). Read online military applications of artificial intelligence. RAND Corporation.
NATO. (2021). Allied joint doctrine for joint targeting. NATO Standardization Office (NSO)
Rondeau, A. (2022, August). Rebalancing the science and art of war for decision advantage. Periodical, 148/8/1,434.
Saini R .K., V.K. Raju, M. S., & Chail, A. (2021). Cry in the sky: Psychological impact on drone operators. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, October 30(Suppl 1), S15–S19. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.328782. Epub 2021 Oct 22. PMID: 34908658; PMCID: PMC8611566.
Sandford, A., & Joly, J. (2021, December 15). ‘A threat to humanity’, NGOs and activists call for a ban on the use of ‘killer robots’. Retrieved from Euronews: https://www.euronews.com/2021/12/13/a-threat-to-humanity-ngos-and-activists-call-for-a-ban-on-the-use-of-killer-robots
Sandford, A., & Joly, J. (2021). ‘A threat to humanity’, NGOs and activists call for a ban on the use of ‘killer robots’. Retrieved from Euronews: https://www.euronews.com/2021/12/13/a-threat-to-humanity-ngos-and-activists-call-for-a-ban-on-the-use-of-killer-robots. Accessed July 1, 2022.
Sharkey, N. (2007). Automated killers and the computing profession. Computer, 40(11), 124, 122–123. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.372
Shattuck, L. G. (2015). Transitioning to autonomy: A human systems integration perspective. In Presented at Transitioning to Autonomy: Changes in the Role of Humans in Air Transportation, Moffett Field, CA, March 10–12, 2015. https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/workshop/autonomy/download/presentations/Shaddock%20.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2022.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artifical. MIT Press.
Sparrow, R. (2007). Killer robots. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x
Taylor, I. (2021). Who is responsible for killer robots? Autonomous weapons, group agency, and the military-industrial complex. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12469
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
US Department of Defense. 2012. Autonomy in weapon systems. Directive 3000.09 (21 November).
Wagner, Markus. 2012. Autonomy in the battlespace: independently operating weapon systems and the law of armed conflict (12 November). International Humanitarian Law and the Changing Technology of War. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2211036
Winter, E. (2022). The compatibility of autonomous weapons with the principles of international humanitarian law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 27(1), 1–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panneerselvam, P. (2024). Autonomous Weapon System: Debating Legal–Ethical Consideration and Meaningful Human Control Challenges in the Military Environment. In: Menon, S., Todariya, S., Agerwala, T. (eds) AI, Consciousness and The New Humanism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0503-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0503-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0502-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0503-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)