Skip to main content

Education and Expenditure Inequality in Indonesia and the Philippines: A Comparative Analysis in an Urban and Rural Dual Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Indonesian Economy and the Surrounding Regions in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 76))

  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

Using nationwide household surveys, this study investigates the roles of education in expenditure inequality in two archipelagic Asian countries: Indonesia and the Philippines. Since disparity between urban and rural areas is one of the main determinants of expenditure inequality and there is a large difference in educational endowments between urban and rural areas, an analysis is conducted in an urban-rural framework. Both countries achieved a notable reduction in expenditure inequality in the 2010s. In Indonesia, the reductions of disparity between education groups and tertiary education group’s within-group inequality in urban areas were the main contributors to the reduction of overall expenditure inequality. In the Philippines, the reductions of expenditure disparities between urban and rural areas and between education groups were the main contributors to the reduction of overall expenditure inequality. In 2018, Indonesia and the Philippines had the same level of expenditure inequality. However, compared to developed countries, their expenditure inequalities are still very high. In Indonesia, expenditure inequality among those with secondary education is the major determinant of overall expenditure inequality. Thus, reducing the secondary group’s within-group inequality is necessary. At the same time, the tertiary group’s within-group inequality should be decreased in urban areas. In the Philippines, expenditure inequality among those with tertiary education is the major determinant of overall expenditure inequality. Thus, reducing the tertiary group’s within-group inequality is imperative. At the same time, the disparity between education groups should be decreased in both urban and rural areas.

We are grateful to the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 18 K01589, 18 K01635, 23K01409 and 23KK0029).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Because Indonesia and the Philippines have different education systems, the number of years of education assigned to each level of education differs between them (see Table 10.11 in the appendix).

  2. 2.

    To measure the amount of education a household owns, this study uses years of education completed by the household head.

  3. 3.

    The formula of the Theil index T will be presented in the methodology section. In this study, another Theil index, the Theil index L, is also used to perform a hierarchical inequality decomposition analysis. But the result is similar to the one by the Theil index T qualitatively and thus it is not presented.

  4. 4.

    These studies include Ikemoto (1985) for Malaysia, Glewwe (1986) for Sri Lanka, Ikemoto and Limskul (1987) for Thailand, Ching (1991) for the Philippines, Tsakloglou (1993) for Greece, Estudillo (1997) for the Philippines, Akita et al. (1999) for Indonesia, Kanbur and Zhang (1999) for China, Parker (1999) for U.K., Dickey (2001) for Great Britain, Liu (2001) for Vietnam, Gray et al. (2003) for Canada, Mukhopadhaya (2003) for Singapore, Rao et al. (2003) for Singapore, Motonishi (2006) for Thailand, Tang and Petrie (2009) for Australia, and Akita and Miyata (2013) for Indonesia.

  5. 5.

    Table 10.11 in the appendix presents the way how to determine the number of years of education completed by the head of household.

  6. 6.

    Ram (1990) argued that educational inequality may decline monotonically with educational expansion for less-developed countries which have already reached a certain level of educational attainment and have adopted free and universal primary education.

  7. 7.

    The between-sector inequality refers to expenditure disparity between the urban and rural sectors, while the between-group disparity refers to expenditure disparity between educational groups.

References

  • Abdullah A, Doucouliagos H, Manning E (2015) Does education reduce income inequality? A meta-regression analysis. J Econ Surv 29(2):301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akita T, Lukman RA (1999) Spatial patterns of expenditure inequalities in Indonesia: 1987, 1990, and 1993. Bull Indones Econ Stud 35:67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akita T, Miyata S (2008) Urbanization, educational expansion, and expenditure inequality in Indonesia in 1996, 1999, and 2002. J Asia Pac Econ 13(2):147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akita T, Miyata S (2013) The roles of location and education in the distribution of economic Well-being in Indonesia: hierarchical and non-hierarchical inequality decomposition analyses. Lett Spat Resour Sci 6(3):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akita T, Lukman RA, Yamada Y (1999) Inequality in the distribution of household expenditures in Indonesia: a Theil decomposition analysis. Dev Econ 37(2):197–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand S (1983) Inequality and poverty in Malaysia: measurement and decomposition. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Asra A (1989) Inequality trends in Indonesia, 1969–1981: a re-examination. Bull Indones Econ Stud 25(2):100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asra A (2000) Poverty and inequality in Indonesia: estimates, decomposition and key issues. J Asia Pac Econ 5:91–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Balisacan AM, Fuwa N (2003) Growth, inequality and politics revisited: a developing-country case. Econ Lett 79(1):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balisacan AM, Fuwa N (2004) Changes in spatial income inequality in the Philippines: an exploratory analysis. Research paper 2004/34, WIDER, United Nations University

    Google Scholar 

  • Balisacan AM, Pernia EM (2002) Probing beneath cross-national averages: poverty, inequality, and growth in the Philippines. ERD Working Paper Series No. 7, Asian Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J Hum Resour 8(4):436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F (1979) Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica 47(4):901–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching P (1991) Size distribution of income in the Philippines. In: Mizoguchi T (ed) Making economies more efficient and more equitable: factors determining income distribution. Tokyo, Kinokuniya Company, pp 157–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Chongvilaivan A, Kim J (2016) Individual income inequality and its drivers in Indonesia: a Theil decomposition reassessment. Soc Indic Res 126:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu HY (2000) The impacts of educational expansion and schooling inequality on income distribution. Quart J Bus Econ 39(2):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagum C (1997) A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratio. Empir Econ 22:515–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio JD, Lee J-W (2002) Education and income inequality: new evidence form cross-country data. Rev Income Wealth 48:395–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gropello E (2011a) Skills for the labor market in Indonesia. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gropello E (2011b) Skills for the labor market in the Philippines. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey H (2001) Regional earnings inequality in Great Britain: a decomposition analysis. Reg Stud 35(7):605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood R, Lipton M (2004) Rural and urban income inequality and poverty: does convergence between sectors offset divergence within them? In: Cornia GA (ed) Inequality, growth, and poverty in an era of liberalization and globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 112–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Estudillo JP (1997) Income inequality in The Philippines, 1961–91. Dev Econ 35(1):68–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glewwe P (1986) The distribution of income in Sri Lanka in 1969–70 and 1980–81: a decomposition analysis. J Dev Econ 24(2):255–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D, Mills JA, Zandvakili S (2003) Statistical analysis of inequality with decompositions: the Canadian experience. Empir Econ 28:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton J, Khandker SR (2009) Handbook on poverty and inequality. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi M, Kataoka M, Akita T (2014) Expenditure inequality in Indonesia, 2008-2010: a spatial decomposition analysis and the role of education. Asian Econ J 28(4):389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes GA, Islam I (1981) Inequality in Indonesia: a decomposition analysis. Bull Indones Econ Stud 17(2):42–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemoto Y (1985) Income distribution in Malaysia: 1957–80. Dev Econ 23(4):347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemoto Y, Limskul K (1987) Income inequality & regional disparity in Thailand, 1962-81. Dev Econ 25(3):249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam I, Khan H (1986) Spatial patterns of inequality and poverty in Indonesia. Bull Indones Econ Stud 22(2):80–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur R, Zhang X (1999) Which regional inequality? The evolution of rural–urban and inland–coastal inequality in China from 1983 to 1995. J Comp Econ 27:686–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur R, Zhuang J (2013) Urbanization and inequality in Asia. Asian Dev Rev 30(1):131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight JB, Sabot RH (1983) Educational expansion and the Kuznets effect. Am Econ Rev 73(5):1132–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert PJ, Aronson JR (1993) Inequality decomposition analysis and the Gini coefficient revisited. Econ J 103:1221–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CHA (2006) Educational expansion, educational inequality, and income inequality: evidence from Taiwan, 1976–2003. Soc Indic Res 80:601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu AYC (2001) Markets, inequality and poverty in Vietnam. Asian Econ J 15(2):217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mapa DS, Balisacan AM, Briones KJS, Albis MLF (2009) What really matters for income growth in the Philippines: empirical evidence from provincial data. In: UPSS working paper series 2009–01, School of Statistics. University of the Philippines, Diliman

    Google Scholar 

  • Motonishi T (2006) Why has income inequality in Thailand increased? An analysis using surveys from 1975 to 1998. Jpn World Econ 18(4):464–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhaya P (2003) Trends in total and subgroup income inequality in the Singaporean workforce. Asian Econ J 17(3):243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumark D (1988) Employers’ discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination. J Hum Resour 23(3):279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca R (1973) Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 14(3):693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park KH (1996) Educational expansion and educational inequality on income distribution. Econ Educ Rev 15(1):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SC (1999) The inequality of employment and self-employment incomes: a decomposition analysis for the U.K. Rev Income Wealth 45(2):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pernia EM (2008) Migration remittances, poverty and inequality: The Philippines. UPSE Discussion Paper, 2008/01, University of the Philippines, School of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram R (1989) Can educational expansion reduce income inequality in less-developed countries. Econ Educ Rev 8(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram R (1990) Educational expansion and schooling inequality: international evidence and some implications. Rev Econ Stat 72(2):266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao VVB, Banerjee DS, Mukhopadhaya P (2003) Earnings inequality in Singapore. J Asia Pac Econ 8(2):210–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seriño MNV (2014) Decomposition analysis of income inequality in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. DLSU Bus Econ Rev 24(1):126–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks A (1980) The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48(3):613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks A, Wan G (2005) Spatial decomposition of inequality. J Econ Geogr 5(1):59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son HH (2008) The role of labor market in explaining growth and inequality in income: The Philippines’ case. Philippines Rev Econ 45(1):69–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang KK, Petrie D (2009) Non-hierarchical bivariate decomposition of Theil indexes. Econ Bull 29(2):928–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakloglou P (1993) Aspects of inequality in Greece: measurement, decomposition and intertemporal change, 1974, 1982. J Dev Econ 40(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2015) Philippine education for all 2015 review report. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2021) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf AA, Sumner A, Rum IA (2014) Twenty years of expenditure inequality in Indonesia, 1993–2013. Bull Indones Econ Stud 50(2):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Akita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 10.11 Years of education

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akita, T., Miyata, S. (2024). Education and Expenditure Inequality in Indonesia and the Philippines: A Comparative Analysis in an Urban and Rural Dual Framework. In: Resosudarmo, B.P., Mansury, Y. (eds) The Indonesian Economy and the Surrounding Regions in the 21st Century. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 76. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0122-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics