Skip to main content

Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite Retrofitted Steel Profiles Using Automated Fibre Placement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
RC Structures Strengthened with FRP for Earthquake Resistance

Part of the book series: Composites Science and Technology ((CST))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional methods for repairing impaired structures such as concreting, steel jackets, or timber splicing are impractical because of the inherent constraints associated with these materials. They would be susceptible to the same deterioration as the existing structure, leading to an ongoing cycle of repairs. Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite jackets offer a wide range of advantages including superior corrosion resistance, lightweight properties, and long-lasting durability. These characteristics make FRP composite jackets highly advantageous compared to conventional repair systems. Additionally, they can be effectively utilized for repairing various types of structures, including those made of timber, steel, and concrete. FRP composite jackets can be implemented through several techniques. However, in the experimental investigation presented in this chapter, automated fibre placement (AFP) was used to overwrap and reinforce two sets of thin-walled square hollow sections (SHS), columns and beams, with thermoplastic carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP). The results obtained were then compared with the control samples without CFRP reinforcement. For the control columns, a good agreement was observed between the predicted and experimental ultimate compressive loads. The ultimate loads of CFRP reinforced columns exceeded the ultimate loads of the control columns. Inward and outward buckling was observed in each column. De-bonding, tearing, and snapping of the CFRP plies was observed in column specimens with thermoplastic CFRP reinforcement. For the control beams, there was a comparable agreement between the predicted ultimate load and the experimental ultimate load. It was found that the ultimate loads for some strengthened beams were higher than that of the control beams. For all beams, there was inward deformation on the upper surface of each beam, and outward deformations were observed on the two side walls of the SHS beams. This experimental investigation showed that the current strengthening processes using AFP is not comparable to traditional CFRP strengthening methods which use epoxy and FRP plies and that further research is required in this space. Due to the failure modes observed, future research is planned to improve the reinforcement method using AFP. The planned improvements are surface preparation, AFP processing conditions, number of CFRP layers and orientation of the CFRP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kumar Nigam P, Akhtar S (2021) Retrofitting practices in various categories of RCC structures—a comprehensive review. Mater Today: Proc 45:7123–7131

    Google Scholar 

  2. 10 Best Retrofitting Techniques for RCC Buildings [Internet]. Civil String Get the Knowledge (2021). Available from: https://civilstring.com/retrofitting-techniques-for-rcc-buildings/

  3. Waghmare SPB (2011) Materials and jacketing technique for retrofitting of structures. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1(1):15–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. FRP Jacketing versus Steel Jacketing—structural strengthening. In: Horse (ed) Solutions (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Trapani F, Malavisi M, Marano G, Greco R, Ferrotto M (2020) Optimal design algorithm for seismic retrofitting of RC columns with steel jacketing technique. Procedia Manuf 44:639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Samy K, Fawzy A, Fouda MA (2023) Strengthening of historic reinforced concrete columns using concrete and FRP jacketing techniques. Asian J Civil Eng 24(3):885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Compressive behavior of concrete-filled FRP tube columns: assessment of critical column parameters. Eng Struct 51:188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed AA, Manalo AC, Ferdous W et al (2020) State-of-the-art of prefabricated FRP composite jackets for structural repair. Eng Sci Technol Int J 23(5):1244–1258

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li G, Kidane S, Pang S-S, Helms JE, Stubblefield MA (2003) Investigation into FRP repaired RC columns. Compos Struct 62(1):83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saafi M, Asa E (eds) (2010) Extending the service life of electric distribution and transmission wooden poles using a wet layup FRP composite strengthening system. J Perform Constructed Facil

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teng JG, Yu T, Fernando D (2012) Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Constr Steel Res 78:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roads V (ed) (2018) Code of practice: FRP for strengthening of bridge structures

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim H, Lee KH, Lee YH, Lee J (2012) Axial behavior of concrete-filled carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite columns. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 21(3):178–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent T, Ozbakkaloglu T (2013) Influence of fiber orientation and specimen end condition on axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete. Constr Build Mater 47:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Teng J, Chen J-F, Smith ST, Lam L (2002) FRP: strengthened RC structures

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu R-Y, Pantelides CP (2017) Rapid repair and replacement of earthquake-damaged concrete columns using plastic hinge relocation. Compos Struct 180:467–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam L, Teng JG (2003) Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Constr Build Mater 17(6):471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazumdar SK (2002) Composites manufacturing: materials, product, and process engineering. CRC Press LLC, United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  19. Performance Proven Worldwide. Wet Lay-Up Process United States of America: Performance Proven Worldwide; cited 2015. Available from: http://www.pactinc.com/capabilities/wet-lay-uphand-lay-up-method/

  20. Cascardi A, Dell’Anna R, Micelli F, Lionetto F, Aiello MA, Maffezzoli A (2019) Reversible techniques for FRP-confinement of masonry columns. Constr Build Mater 225:415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutowski T (1997) Advanced composites manufacturing. Wiley, New York, p 600

    Google Scholar 

  22. August Z, Ostrander G, Hauber D (eds) (2015) Additive manufacturing with high performance thermoplastic composites. In: The second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  23. Werner D (ed) (2015) Multi-material-head novel laser-assisted tape, prepreg and dry-fiber placement system. In: The second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stokes-Griffin CM, Compston P (2015) The effect of processing temperature and placement rate on the short beam strength of carbon fibre–PEEK manufactured using a laser tape placement process. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 78:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oromiehie E, Prusty BG, Compston P, Rajan G (2019) Automated fibre placement based composite structures: review on the defects, impacts and inspections techniques. Compos Struct 224:110987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Landry A (ed) (2015) The needs for automation in composite design and manufacturing. In: The second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  27. Béland S (1990) High performance thermoplastic resins and their composites: Noyes Data Corp

    Google Scholar 

  28. August Z, Ostrander G, Michasiow J, Hauber D (2014) Recent development in automated fibre placement of thermoplastic composites. SAMPE 50(2):30–37

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jonsson M, Eklund D, Järneteg A, Åkermo M, Sjölander J (eds) (2015) Automated manufacturing of an integrated pre-preg structure. In: The second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  30. Di Francesco M, Giddings P, Potter K (eds) (2015) On the layup of convex corners using automated fibre placement: an evaluation method. In: the second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  31. Girdauskaite L, Krzywinski S, Schmidt-Eisenlohr C, Krings M (eds) (2015) Introduction of automated 3d vacuum buildup in the composite manufacturing chain. In: The second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quddus M, Brux A, Larregain B, Galarneau Y (eds) (2015) A study to determine the influence of robotic lamination programs on the precision of automated fiber placement through statistical comparisons. In: The second international symposium on automated composites manufacturing. Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  33. Serubibi A, Hazell PJ, Escobedo JP et al (2023) Fibre-metal laminate structures: high-velocity impact, penetration, and blast loading–a review. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 173:107674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Serubibi A, Hazell PJ, Escobedo JP, Wang H, Oromiehie E, Prusty GB (2021) Analysis of AFP manufactured fibre metal laminate structures under impact loading. Engineers Australia, BARTON, ACT

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maung PT, Prusty BG, Oromiehie E, Phillips AW, St John NA (2022) Design and manufacture of a shape-adaptive full-scale composite hydrofoil using automated fibre placement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123(11):4093–4108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Air A, Shamsuddoha M, Oromiehie E, Prusty BG (2023) Development of an automated fibre placement-based hybrid composite wheel for a solar-powered car. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125(9):4083–4097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maung PT, Prusty BG, Donough MJ, Oromiehie E, Phillips AW, St John NA (2023) Automated manufacture of optimised shape-adaptive composite hydrofoils with curvilinear fibre paths for improved bend-twist performance. Mar Struct 87:103327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Garg DP, Zikry MA, Anderson GL (2001) Current and potential future research activities in adaptive structures: an ARO perspective. Smart Mater Struct 10(4):610–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chung DDL (2010) Composite materials: science and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, London, United Kingdom, p 371

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bannister M (2001) Challenges for composites into the next millennium—a reinforcement perspective. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 32(7):901–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Spenser J (2006) Boeing technologies developed for commercial jetliners are now being integrated into some military products. Boeing Frontiers Online

    Google Scholar 

  42. Efficiency and reliability: Airbus (2023). Available from: https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/commercial-aircraft/passenger-aircraft/a380

  43. Balageas D (2006) Introduction to structural health monitoring. Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  44. Prusty BG, Oromiehie E, Rajan G (2016) Introduction to composite materials and smart structures. In: Iniewski K (ed) Structural health monitoring of composite structures using fiber optic methods. Devices, Circuits, and Systems. CRC Press, New York, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  45. Elmar W, Bernhard J (2014) Composites market report. The European GRP market (AVK) TgCmC

    Google Scholar 

  46. Prepregs: Composites One (2017). Available from: http://www.compositesone.com/product/prepreg/

  47. What are prepregs? Fibre Glast Development Corporation (n.d.) [Available from: http://www.fibreglast.com/product/about-prepregs/Learning_Center

  48. Daniel IM, Ishai O (2006) Engineering mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. Thermosets: Polymers International Australia (2014) [Available from: http://polymers.com.au/thermosets/

  50. Common Thermoplastics and Thermoseting and there uses: United Kingdom: Stephens Plastic Mouldings (n.d.) cited 2015. Available from: http://www.stephensinjectionmoulding.co.uk/thermoplastics/

  51. Chang IY, Lees JK (1988) Recent development in thermoplastic composites: a review of matrix systems and processing methods. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 1(3):277–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Muzzy JD, Kays AO (2004) Thermoplastic versus thermosetting structural composites. Polymer Compos 5(3)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zeng J-J, Liang S-D, Li Y-L, Guo Y-C, Shan G-Y (2021) Compressive behavior of FRP-confined elliptical concrete-filled high-strength steel tube columns. Compos Struct 266:113808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gain AK, Oromiehie E, Prusty BG (2022) Nanomechanical characterisation of CF-PEEK composites manufactured using automated fibre placement (AFP). Compos Commun 31:101109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Oromiehie E, Gain AK, Donough MJ, Prusty BG (2022) Fracture toughness assessment of CF-PEEK composites consolidated using hot gas torch assisted automated fibre placement. Compos Struct 279:114762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Oromiehie E, Gain AK, Prusty BG (2021) Processing parameter optimisation for automated fibre placement (AFP) manufactured thermoplastic composites. Compos Struct 272:114223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Arns J-Y, Oromiehie E, Arns C, Prusty BG (2021) Micro-CT analysis of process-induced defects in composite laminates using AFP. Mater Manuf Process 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  58. Oromiehie E, Garbe U, Prusty BG (2019) Porosity analysis of carbon fibre reinforced polymer laminates manufactured using automated fibre placement. Compos Mater

    Google Scholar 

  59. Matti FN, Oromiehie E, Mashiri FR, Prusty BG (2022) Strengthening of steel beams with thermoplastic CFRP overwrapping using automated fibre placement. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Structural Engineering Research (iCSER 2022), 20–22 November 2022, Sydney, Australia, pp 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  60. Online SA (2016) Steel structures, AS 1163–2016. SAI Global database 1998

    Google Scholar 

  61. Online SA (1998) Steel structures, AS 4100–1998. SAI Global database 1998

    Google Scholar 

  62. OneSteel Market Mills (2004) Cold formed structural hollow sections and profiles, 4th edn

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by Western Sydney University (WSU) and University of New South Wales (UNSW). The authors would like to acknowledge the support received through following funding schemes of Australian Government:

ARC LIEF: An Australasian facility for the automated fabrication of high-performance bespoke components (LE140100082).

ARC ITTC: ARC Training Centre for Automated Manufacture of Advanced Composites (IC160100040).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahim Oromiehie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oromiehie, E., Matti, F., Mashiri, F., Prusty, G.B. (2024). Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite Retrofitted Steel Profiles Using Automated Fibre Placement. In: Singh, S.B., Murty, C.V.R. (eds) RC Structures Strengthened with FRP for Earthquake Resistance. Composites Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0102-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0102-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0101-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0102-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics