Skip to main content

Comparative Study of Various Machine Learning Models for Estimating Standard Penetration Test-N Value

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Communities (IACESD 2023)

Abstract

The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is a widely used field test in geotechnical engineering to determine the consistency, strength, and other properties of soil. This paper presents an alternative approach to determine the Standard Penetration Resistance Value. A lot of times, due to budget limitations, time constraints, and other concerns, there is a tendency to discard this test. Often, N value is estimated from the adjacent site if the data is available, else it is discarded. Various studies have been carried out to determine factors such as shear velocity and angle of internal friction to estimate SPT-N value. This research is a novel approach to estimate N value of the soil with the help of various soil parameters. Here, N value of cohesionless soil is estimated using different techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), XGBoost model, ElasticNet model, lasso regression model, extra trees, Bayesian linear regression, ridge regression, AdaBoost, and random forest models with the help of seven soil parameters, namely moisture content, soil composition (% of gravel, sand, silt, and clay content), bulk density, and dry density. The model is trained on a dataset of SPT-N values and corresponding soil properties. The performance of these models is evaluated using various statistical measures and compared with the existing empirical equations. The results show that the random forest and AdaBoost models have the most efficient performance with R2 values of 0.62 and 0.63, respectively, while their accuracies are 84.53% and 83.61%, respectively. The proposed approach can be a useful tool for geotechnical engineers to predict the SPT-N values of soils and thus facilitate more efficient and cost-effective site investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rahman MM (2020) Foundation design using standard penetration test (SPT) N-value. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23159.73123

  2. Reich Y (1997) Machine learning techniques for civil engineering problems. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 12:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy YR (2022) Issue 2. www.jetir.org

  4. Erzin Y, Tuskan Y (2017) Prediction of standard penetration test (SPT) value in Izmir, Turkey using radial basis neural network. Celal Bayar Ãœniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.319912

  5. Tarawneh B (2017) Predicting standard penetration test N-value from cone penetration test data using artificial neural networks. Geosci Front 8:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2016.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mbarak WK, Cinicioglu EN, Cinicioglu O (2020) SPT based determination of undrained shear strength: Regression models and machine learning. Front Struct Civ Eng 14:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0591-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galupino J, Dungca J (2022) Development of a k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) machine learning model to estimate the SPT N-values of Valenzuela City, Philippines. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Institute of Physics

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arshid MU (2021) Knowledge based prediction of standard penetration resistance of soil using geotechnical database. Civ Eng J (Iran) 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-SP2021-07-01

  9. Nugroho SA, Fernando H, Suryanita R (2021) Prediction of standard penetration test value on cohesive soil using artificial neural networks. J Inform 5:103. https://doi.org/10.26555/jifo.v15i2.a19822

  10. Fernando H, Nugroho SA, Suryanita R, Kikumoto M (2021) Prediction of SPT value based on CPT data and soil properties using ANN with and without normalization. Int J Artif Intell Res. https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v5i2.208

  11. Grossi E, Buscema M (2007) Introduction to artificial neural networks. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:1046–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1999) A short introduction to boosting

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 785–794

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 67(2):301–320

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 58(1):267–268

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Freijeiro-González L, Febrero-Bande M, González-Manteiga W (2020) A critical review of LASSO and its derivatives for variable selection under dependence among covariates. Int Statistical Rev 90(1):118–145

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006) Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn 63:3–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wundervald B, Ali A, Inglis AN, Prado E (2019) Bayesian linear regression Bayesian trees view project R-music view project Bayesian linear regression. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28385.97121

  19. Hastie T (2020) Ridge regularization: an essential concept in data science. Technometrics 62:426–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2020.1791959

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Tu C, Liu H, Xu B (2017) AdaBoost typical algorithm and its application research. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  21. Breiman L (2001) Random forests

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Rizwan Shaik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shaik, M.R., Atyam, H., Dharavath, S., Nageshwar Rao, C. (2024). Comparative Study of Various Machine Learning Models for Estimating Standard Penetration Test-N Value. In: Menon, N.V.C., Kolathayar, S., Rodrigues, H., Sreekeshava, K.S. (eds) Recent Advances in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Communities. IACESD 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 459. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0072-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0072-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-97-0071-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-97-0072-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics