Skip to main content

Using Inquiry to Facilitate Meaningful Learning in Inorganic Chemistry Qualitative Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inquiry into the Singapore Science Classroom

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

  • 848 Accesses

Abstract

Many teachers find that their students do not seem to be able to link what they do in the laboratory with what they learn in the classroom. As such, students are unaware of what to think about and take note of during experiments; the same situation exists in Singapore. For example, research using a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument has shown that Singapore secondary and junior college students, as well as graduate pre-service teachers, have difficulty understanding the procedures and reactions involved in basic inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis practical work. To address these difficulties and make learning during practical work more meaningful, an inquiry-based approach to learning basic qualitative analysis was developed to engage students in learning the key procedures, reactions and concepts involved through empirical investigations. The inquiry-based instructional package was implemented in one school and the same diagnostic instrument was administered to the students involved 4 months later. The results indicated that the secondary 4 students who had undergone the instructional package obtained better scores than the secondary 4 students involved in the first study and had lower levels of alternative conceptions. This indicated the feasibility of using inquiry to facilitate students’ understanding and application of science concepts during practical work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berry, A., Mulhall, P., Gunstone, R., & Loughran, J. (1999). Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A. (2012). Moving the essence of inquiry into the classroom: Engaging teachers and students in authentic science. In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 25–42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, L. B. (2000). Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In B. E. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science: The role and reality of practical work in school science (pp. 67–77). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 655–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 70, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1992). Redefining and reorienting practical work in school science. School Science Review, 73, 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 5, 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H., & Wham, A. J. B. (1982). The demands of practical work. Education in Chemistry, 19, 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, M. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students’ understanding of acid, base and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1077–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sere, M.-G. (2002). Towards renewed research questions from the outcomes of the European project ‘Labwork in Science Education’. Science Education, 86, 624–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, A. E., Bula, O. A., & Cornett, J. W. (2001). The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 408–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D. (2000). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate secondary students’ conceptions of qualitative analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Secondary students’ perceptions about learning qualitative analysis in inorganic chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002a). A cross-age study on the understanding of the reactions involved in basic inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 25(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002b). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2004). Qualitative analysis practical work. School Science Review, 85, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Linking the macroscopic, sub-microscopic and symbolic levels: The case of inorganic qualitative analysis. In J. K. Gilbert & D. F. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 137–150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Facing the mismatches in the classroom. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of children’s science (pp. 66–80). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F. (1995). Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 327–346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES). (1997). Chemistry: Report on the November 1996 examinations. Cambridge, UK: UCLES.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. (2011). Chemistry: GCE Ordinary Level (Syllabus 5072). Cambridge, UK: UCLES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B., & Allsop, T. (1985). Practical work in science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Chwee Daniel Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, K.C.D. (2014). Using Inquiry to Facilitate Meaningful Learning in Inorganic Chemistry Qualitative Analysis. In: Tan, AL., Poon, CL., Lim, S. (eds) Inquiry into the Singapore Science Classroom. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-78-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics