Skip to main content

Refocusing the Quality Discourse: The United States National Survey of Student Engagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engaging University Students

Abstract

This chapter reports on work conducted with nearly 1,500 bachelor's degree-granting colleges and universities in the USA to assess the extent to which their undergraduates are exposed to and participate in empirically proven effective educational activities. The chapter begins with a discussion of the prevailing quality discourse in the USA. It then explores the conceptual and empirical foundations of student engagement and the origins of NSSE as both a response to the quality problem and as a diagnostic tool to facilitate improvement. The chapter also discusses tensions between internal improvement and external accountability efforts, and NSSE’s role in the assessment and accountability movements. It concludes with a discussion of challenges that confront the project going forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how m uch students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. M., & Cabrera, A. F. (2011). How sound is NSSE? Investigating the psychometric properties of NSSE at a public, research-extensive institution. Review of Higher Education, 35, 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. S. (n.d.). An Overview of U.S. Accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Washington, DC. http://www.chea.org/pdf/overview_US_accred_8-03.pdf.

  • Ewell, P. T. (1999). Linking performance measures to resource allocation: Exploring unmapped terrain. Quality in Higher Education, 5(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (2008). U.S. accreditation and the future of quality assurance: A tenth anniversary report from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Washington, DC: Council on Higher Education Accreditation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (2010). The US national survey of student engagement (NSSE). In D. D. Dill & M. Beerkens (Eds.), Public policy for academic quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments (pp. 83–97). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (Eds.) (2009). Using NSSE in institutional research. New directions for institutional research (Vol. 141). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17, 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2007). Risky business: Promises and pitfalls of institutional transparency. Change, 33(3), 10–17, 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. M. Gonyea & G. D. Kuh (Eds.), Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141 (pp. 5–20). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Pascarella, E. T. (2004). What does institutional selectivity tell us about educational quality? Change, 36(5), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C. (2007). First, do no harm. Carnegie Perspectives. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/first-do-no-harm. Accessed 6. May. 2013.

  • McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2013). Student engagement: Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research: Vol. 28. (pp. 47–92). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C., & McClenney, K. (2012). Will these trees ever bear fruit? A response to the special issue on student engagement. Review of Higher Education, 35, 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2008). Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within–2008 results. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2009). Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time–Annual results 2009. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change, 42(1), 16–22.Pike, G. R. (2013). NSSE benchmarks and institutional outcomes: A note on the importance of considering the intended uses of a measure in validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 54, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, L. (2008). Pulling rank: A plan to help students with college choice in an age of rankings. New England Journal of Higher Education, 22(4), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. (2000). Playing with numbers. [Article]. Washington Monthly, 32(9), 16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander C. McCormick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: NSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice

Appendix A: NSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice

Level of Academic Challenge

  • Number of assigned textbooks, books or book-length packs of course readings

  • Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more

  • Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages

  • Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages

  • Coursework emphasizes analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience or theory, such as examining a particular case or situation in-depth and considering its components

  • Coursework emphasizes synthesizing and organizing ideas, information or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships

  • Coursework emphasizes making judgments about the value of information, arguments or methods, such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions

  • Coursework emphasizes applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

  • Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor’s standards or expectations

Active and Collaborative Learning

  • Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions

  • Made a class presentation

  • Worked with other students on projects during class

  • Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

  • Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)

  • Participated in a community-based project (e.g. service learning) as part of a regular course

  • Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Student−Faculty Interaction

  • Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor

  • Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class

  • Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor

  • Received prompt feedback from faculty on your academic performance (written or oral)

  • Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.)

  • Worked on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements

Enriching Educational Experiences

  • Had serious conversations with students who are very different from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

  • Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own

  • Institutional emphasis: contact among students from different economic, social and racial or ethnic backgrounds

  • Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment

  • Participation in:

    • Co-curricular activities (organisations, campus publications, student government, social fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

    • A learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together

    • Community service or volunteer work

    • Foreign language coursework

    • Study abroad

    • Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

    • Independent study or self-designed major

    • Culminating senior experience (capstone course, thesis, project, comprehensive exam, etc.)

Supportive Campus Environment

  • Institutional emphasis: Providing the support you need to thrive socially

  • Institutional emphasis: Providing the support you need to help you succeed academically

  • Institutional emphasis: Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

  • Quality of relationships with other students

  • Quality of relationships with faculty members

  • Quality of relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCormick, A., Kinzie, J. (2014). Refocusing the Quality Discourse: The United States National Survey of Student Engagement. In: Coates, H., McCormick, A. (eds) Engaging University Students. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-63-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics