Abstract
As the millennium turned, student engagement emerged as a new and compelling approach to assessing and improving the quality of undergraduate education. An important measure of its appeal is the rapidity with which it has been embraced in a range of national contexts through the implementation of the surveys documented in this volume. These implementations represent an international network of collaborating researchers who are simultaneously building knowledge, promoting educational improvement and focusing quality discourses away from crude measures and rankings in favour of critical matters of educational practice. Rather than slavishly adopting a fixed vision of student engagement, these adaptations respect the importance of national context. Although multinational inquiry into student engagement is in its infancy, a number of important lessons have already emerged that can guide educational improvement efforts at both institutional and governmental or ministerial levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coates, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2012). Recasting the academic workforce: Why the attractiveness of the academic profession needs to be increased and eight possible strategies for how to go about this from an Australian perspective. Higher Education, 64, 875–889.
Coates, H., & Mahat, M. (2014). Threshold quality parameters in hybrid higher education. Higher Education.Â
Coates, H., & Mahat, M. (2013). Assessing student engagement and outcomes: Modelling insights from Australia and around the world. International Journal of Chinese Education, 2 (2), 241–264.
Hu, S., & McCormick, A. C. (2012). An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 53, 738–754.
Kinzie, J., & Pennipede, B. S. (2009). Converting engagement results into action. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 83–96.
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17.
McCormick, A. C., Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J. (2013). Refreshing engagement. Change, 45(3), 6–15.
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2013). Student engagement: Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28). The Netherlands: Springer.
Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. San Francisco: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coates, H., McCormick, A. (2014). Emerging Trends and Perspectives. In: Coates, H., McCormick, A. (eds) Engaging University Students. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-63-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-63-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4585-62-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-63-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)