Advertisement

ASEAN and R2P

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Political Science book series (BRIEFSPOLITICAL)

Abstract

Amongst the many that endorsed R2P in 2005 during the UN World Summit were the ASEAN states. Yet, R2P has enjoyed only lip service in Southeast Asia. A key factor behind this is the principle of non-interference, a key doctrine in the group’s worldview in inter-state relations. This chapter reviews the reasons for this lukewarm attitude towards R2P and where the ASEAN states stand over the issue of international intervention especially Libya and Syria. Notwithstanding the ambivalent reception to R2P in Southeast Asia, efforts are being made by scholars and think tanks to mainstream the concept within policy-making. Is a typology of R2P positions within ASEAN emerging?

Keywords

Gulf cooperation council Cyclone nargis Rohingya ASEAN way Organisation of islamic cooperation (OIC) Five principles of peaceful co-existence Constructive engagement 

References

  1. Abbas, H. (2012, September 9). The Rohingya crisis: ASEAN vs Red Cross. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/09/06/the-rohingya-crisis-asean-vs-red-cross.html
  2. Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect .(2012). ASEAN, the Rohingyas and Myanmar’s responsibility to protect. AP R2P Brief, 2(9), 1–7.Google Scholar
  3. Annan, K. (2012). Interventions: A life in war and peace. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bernama. (2011, May 13). Malaysia announces support and peacekeepers for Govt of Bahrain. Bahrain: Bernama Media.Google Scholar
  5. Bellamy, A., & Beeson, M. (2010). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Can ASEAN reconcile humanitarianism and sovereignty? Asian Security, 6(3), 262–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellamy, A., & Davies, S. E. (2009). The responsibility to protect in the Asia Pacific region. Security Dialogue, 40(6), 547–574.Google Scholar
  7. Capie, D. (2009). S.Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Singapore: Defence Studies Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Capie, D. (2012). The responsibility to protect norm in Southeast Asia: framing, resistance and the Localisation Myth. Pacific Review, 25(1), 75–93.Google Scholar
  9. Chooi, C. (2012, May 28). Bersih 3.0 not like the Arab Spring, says Umno deputy minister. Retrieved June 30, 2012, from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/mobile/malaysia/article/bersih-3.0-not-like-the-arab-spring-says-umno-deputy-minister/
  10. Chooi, C. (2012, Nov 6). Bersih not looking for an Arab Spring, Ambiga tells CNN’s Amanpour. The Malaysian Insider. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/bersih-not-looking-for-an-arab-spring-ambiga-tells-cnns-amanpour
  11. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2010, March 4). Applying the responsibility to protect to Burma/Myanmar. Retrieved August 12, 2012, from http://www.globalr2p.org/publications/27
  12. Karim, M. F. (2012, August 3). ASEAN responsibility to protect. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/08/03/asean-responsibility-protect.html
  13. Kassim, Y. R. (2012). Plight of the Rohingya: ASEAN credibility at stake. RSIS Commentaries 207/2012. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/Perspective/RSIS2072012.pdf2012
  14. Author’s interview with a Senior ASEAN diplomat on 2 April 2012. Google Scholar
  15. Nichols, M. (2012, November 26). U.N. committee expresses concern for Myanmar’s Muslims. Reuters. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/us-myanmar-un-idUSBRE8AP16Y20121126
  16. Pacific Forum CSIS, Issues & Insights. (2011, July). Responsibility to protect: Delivering on the promise by Alexander Bellamy (vol. 11). Routledge: Carolina Hernandez, Pierre Lizee & Rizal Sukma.Google Scholar
  17. Roughneen, S. (2012 l, April 28). Bersih 3.0: Reform storm gathers in Malaysia. Deen Marican. The Malaysian DJ Blogger. Retrieved 30 April 2012 http://dinmerican.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/bersih-3-0-reform-storm-gathers-in-malaysia/
  18. Sukma, R. (2012). The ASEAN political and security community (APSC): Opportunities and constraints for the R2P in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 25(1), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thakur, R. (2011). Dissemination meeting and policy roundtable on the responsibility to protect, RtoP. Tokyo: Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies and JICA Research Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Thalang, J. N. (2012, November 18). Asean chief urges relief for Myanmar’s Rohingya. The Nation in ASEAN News Network. Retrieved November 30, 2012, from http://www.asianewsnet.net/home/news.php?id=39014

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations