Advertisement

Measuring eGovernment Systems Success: An Empirical Study

  • Mohamed E. Edrees
  • Amjad Mahmood
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 285)

Abstract

eGovernment is connecting the government with citizens, businesses, and other stakeholders, via computers and internet. It has received fairly extensive attention in recent years. Many governments have realized the importance of using information and communication technologies to provide efficient and transparent government. It is therefore important to measure the success of government-to-citizen (G2C) eGovernment systems from the citizens’ perspective. This study provides an empirical test of an adaptation of DeLone and McLean’s IS success model in the context of G2C eGovernment. Data collected by questionnaire from 149 users of eGovernment gateway in Bahrain were analyzed. All hypothesized relationships between the six success variables are significantly or marginally supported. This paper concludes by discussing limitations, which should be addressed in future research.

Keywords

Electronic (e) government EGovernment system success Systems success Success/impact measurement Delone and mclean 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Irani, Z., Love, P. E., & Jones, S. (2008). Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 155–164.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isaac, W. C. (2007). Performance Measurement for the e-Government Initiatives: A Comparative Study. Dissertation Abstracts International.(UMI No: 3283471).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Obi, M. C. (2009). Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring e-Government User Satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts International.(UMI No. 3379230).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50-69.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rose, W. R., & Grant, G. G. (2010). Critical issues pertaining to the planning and implementation of E Government initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 26–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seddon, P. B., & kiew, M. Y. (1996). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 90-109.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2005). E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 217–238.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 487–497.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 717–733.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science Department, Information Technology CollageUniversity of BahrainSakhirBahrain

Personalised recommendations