Abstract
In this Chapter, we place an emphasis on how the cultural-discursive, material-economic and social-political conditions for transformed practices in schools can be created by reshaping the arrangements amidst which educators practise. Specifically, we focus on leading as a practice, rather than as series of traits or capabilities invested in sovereign individuals. Our focus on practices is not to eschew the important work that is undertaken by principals and other formal leaders but, by using the verb ‘leading’ we are drawing attention to the ‘situated knowledge and situated action’ which resides in the work of leading. On this view, ‘leading’ is not a set of practices that is invested solely in the principalship. We discuss the practice architectures which make possible both formal and informal practices of leading and show how small but highly significant changes in the relations of power embedded in the practices and practice architectures we observed have enabled a richer sense of shared responsibility for leading and learning to be facilitated amongst executive teams, teachers, students and communities. We conclude that stimulating educational development requires not only the enlightened practices of positional leaders but also a thickening of leading practices throughout the school, and, beyond the school setting, in school districts and among other key stakeholders the community. This also requires a fundamental shift towards viewing leading practices as situated in an overall project of education development (a social and critical view) rather than school improvement (a technical and managerialist view).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
On a Piagetian cognitive interactionist view, one might say both that teachers had assimilated these arrangements and that they accommodated themselves (or were accommodated) to these arrangements; in our terms, by accommodating themselves to these practice architectures (or being accommodated by interacting with them), these practitioners assimilated the sayings, doings and relatings of the relevant practices. On the relationship between assimilation and accommodation in Piagetian theory, see Piaget 1971, pp. 172–182.
References
Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organisational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and policy in schools, 9(3), 292–327.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (Trans: Nice, R.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Edwards-Groves, C., Brennan-Kemmis, R., Hardy, I., & Ponte, P. (2010). Relational architectures: Recovering solidarity and agency as living practices in education. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 18(1), 43–54.
Edwards-Groves, C., & Rönnerman, K. (2013). Generating leading practices through professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 39(1), 122–140.
Gherardi, S. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise? In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in organization and management (pp. 516–525). Los Angeles: Sage.
Hargreaves, A., Halasz, G., & , Pont, B. (2007). School leadership for systemic improvement in Finland. A case study report for the OECD activity. Retrieved from Improving school leadership website: http://www.bestlibrary.org/files/school-leadership-for-systematic-improvement-in-finland.pdf.
Kemmis, S. &, Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–62). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Hardy, I., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2009). Leading and learning: Developing ecologies of educational practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Canberra.
Leithwood, K. (2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 245–291.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2010). Principal leadership and straddling fields: A Bourdieuian account. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes (Trans: Walsh, B.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Winmalee: Australian Council for Educational Leaders (ACEL) Monograph Series. Monograph 41.
Smeed, J., Kimber, M., Millwater, J., & Ehrich, L. (2009). Power over, with and through: Another look at micropolitics. Leading and Managing, 15(1), 26–41.
Wilkinson, J., Olin, A., Lund, T., Ahlberg, A., & Nyvaller, M. (2010). Leading praxis: Exploring educational leadership through the lens of practice architectures. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 18(1), 67–80.
Wilkinson, J., Olin, A., Lund, T., Stjernstrom, E. (2013). Understanding leading as travelling practices. School Leadership and Management. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2013.773886.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., Bristol, L. (2014). Practising Leading. In: Changing Practices, Changing Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-46-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-47-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)