Abstract
This chapter intends to explain how global university rankings can be understood as a mechanism holding Taiwan’s interests within the context of the emergence of an international higher education market and the prospect of regionalisation in East Asia. To illustrate Taiwan’s interests in university ranking systems, the chapter argues that league tables can be used to promote Taiwan’s interests in three ways. Firstly, it pointed out that university rankings have been taken by the Taiwanese government as a metric system to indicate the standard of universities, thereby reflecting their distance from the status of world-class university. In this sense, rankings are used as a governing tool to align the architecture of Taiwan’s higher education system, thereby advancing its competitiveness. Secondly, university rankings are seen as a zoning technology promoting the growing trends toward regionalisation of higher education in East Asia. Thirdly, university rankings are considered as a mechanism of agenda setting promoting the discourses of Chineseness in global higher education. These two anticipations are developed based on the context of China’s rise and the emergence of the idea of the Greater China in higher education. They are involved in Taiwan’s interests, as it is believed that the Taiwanese higher education sector can plausibly extend its influences in the process of regionalisation.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Knight (2012) argued that there are three regionalisation approaches, namely, functional, organisational and political. Quality assurance and accreditation and research citation indexes are seen as examples of functional approach initiatives, aligning higher education systems in the region.
References
Altbach, P. G. (2007). Empires of knowledge and development. In P. G. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), World class worldwide: transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 1–30). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Anonymous. (2010). After fierce debate, Taiwan will enroll students from mainland China The Chronicle of Higher Education. City.
Arimoto, A. (2011). Reaction to academic ranking: knowledge production, faculty productivity from an international perspective. In: J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 229–258). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2011). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education, 61(4), 431–444.
Butler, D. (2010). University rankings smarten up. Nature, 464(4), 16–17.
Castells. (2000). End of millennium. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Centre for Higher Education Development [CHE], UNESCO-European Centre for Higher Education [CEPES], Institute for Higher Education Policy [IHEP]. (2006) Berlin Principles on Ranking of Higher Education Institutions, www.che.de/downloads/Berlin_Principles_IREG_534.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2009.
Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Chou, C. P., & Ching, G. (2012). Taiwan education at the crossroad: When globalization meets localization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chou, C. P., Lin, H.-f., & Chiu, Y.-j (2013). “The impact of SSCI and SCI on Taiwan’s academy: An outcry for fair play”. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(1), 23–31.
Dale, R. (2008). “Changing meanings of “the Europe of knowledge” and “modernizing the university,” from Bologna to the “new Lisbon”. European Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 27–42.
Dale, R. (2009a) Contexts, constraints and resources in the development of European education space and European education policy. In S. Robertson & R. Dale (Eds.), Globalisation and Europeanisation in education (pp. 23–43). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Dale, R. (2009b) Studying globalisation and Europeanisation in education: Lisbon, the open method of coordination and beyond. In: S. Robertson & R. Dale (Eds.), Globalisation and Europeanisation in education (pp. 121–140). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Deem, R., Lucas, L., & Mok, K. H. (2009). The ‘world-class’ university in Europe and East Asia: Dynamics and consequences of global higher education reform. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker (Eds.), University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 117–134). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Deem, R., Mok, K. H., & Lucas, L. (2008). “Transforming higher education in whose image? exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia”. Higher Education Policy, 21(3), 83–97.
deLisle, J. (2010). Soft power in a hard place: China, Taiwan, cross-strait relations and U.S. policy. Orbis, 54(4), 493–524.
Dill, D. D. (2009). Convergence and diversity: The role and influence of university rankings. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker (Eds.), University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 97-116). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hawkins, J. N. (2012). Regionalization and harmonization of higher education in Asia: Easier said than done. Asian Education and Development Studies, 1(1), 96–108.
Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan [HEEACT]. (2009) College Navigator in Taiwan. http://cnt.heeact.edu.tw. Accessed 30 Nov 2009.
Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan [HEEACT]. (various years) “Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities”, http://ranking.heeact.edu.tw. Accessed 3 May 2013
Hou, Y.-C. A. (2008). A comparative study of national and global college rankings according to Berlin Principles and Usher & Savino’s indicator model. Evaluation in Higher Education, 2(2), 113–142.
Hou, Y.-C. A. (2009). Building a user-centered college navigator in Taiwan. Evaluation Bimonthly, 22: 10-16. [in Chinese]
Hou, Y.-C. A., & Morse, R. (2009). Quality assurance and excellence in Taiwan higher education—an analysis of three Taiwan major college rankings. Evaluation in Higher Education, 3(2), 45–41.
Hou, Y.-C. A., Morse, R., & Shao, Y.-j. E. (2012). Is there a gap between students’ preference and university presidents’ concern over college ranking indicators?: A case study of ‘‘College Navigator in Taiwan’’. Higher Education, 64(6), 767–787.
Information Portal for Accredited Self-financing Post-secondary Programmes [IPASS]. (2013). Enrolments of Full-time Accredited Self-financing Post-secondary Programmes. http://www.ipass.gov.hk/eng/stat.aspx. Accessed 14 Sep 2013.
Jones, G. (2008). Can provincial universities be global institutions? rethinking the institution as the unit of analysis in the study of globalization and higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(4), 457–468.
Kehm, B. M., & Stensaker, B. (Eds.) (2009). University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Knight, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for the regionalization of higher education: Application to Asia. In J. N. Hawkins, K. H. Mok, & D. Neubauer (Eds.) Higher education regionalization in asia pacific: implications for governance, citizenship and university transformation (pp. 17–35). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Li, M. (Ed.) (2009). Soft power: China’s emerging strategy in international politics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Li, M., Shanker, S., & Tang, K. K. (2011). Why does the USA dominate university league tables?. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 923–937.
Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.
Liu, N. C., Cheng, Y., & Liu, L. (2004). Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics: A comment to the “fatal attraction”. Scientometrics, 64(1), 101–109.
Liu, N. C., Wang, Q., & Cheng, Y. (Eds.) (2011). Paths to a world-class university: Lessons from practices and experiences. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2009). Reflections on internationalisation of higher education in Taiwan: Perspectives and prospects. Higher Education, 58(6), 733–745.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2011). Soft power, university rankings and knowledge production: Distinctions between hegemony and self-determination in higher education. Comparative Education, 47(2), 209–222.
Lo, W. Y. W. (2013). The political economy of cross-border higher education: The intra-national flow of students in Greater China. In M. Izuhara (Ed.), Handbook on East Asian Social Policy (pp. 454-473). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marginson, S. (2009). Open source knowledge and university rankings. Thesis Eleven, 96, 9–39.
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 282–309.
Ministry of Education [MOE], Taiwan. (2010). Programme for Aiming for Top University. http://www.edu.tw/files/list/B0069/發展國際一流大學及頂尖研究中心修正計畫書(97修正核定版).pdf. Accessed 31 July 2010.
Ministry of Education [MOE], Taiwan. (2013). Education Statistics, The Republic of China. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education [MOE], China. (2013). 2012 Statistics of Education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6200/index.html. Accessed 14 September 2013.
Mok, K. H. (2010). Emerging regulatory regionalism in university governance: A comparative study of China and Taiwan. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 87–103.
Moutsios, S. (2010). “Power, politics and transnational policy-making in education”. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 121–141.
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2013). Postsecondary Institutions and Cost of Attendance in 2012-13; Degrees and Other Awards Conferred, 2011-12; and 12-Month Enrollment, 2011-12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education.
Neubauer, D. (2010). Ten globalization challenges to higher education quality and quality assurance. Evaluation in Higher Education, 4(1), 13–37.
Neubauer, D. (2012). Higher education regionalization in Asia Pacific: Implications for governance, citizenship and university transformation. Asian Education and Development Studies, 1(1), 11–17.
Postiglione, G. A. (2005). Questioning centre-periphery platforms. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(2), 209–225.
QS World University Rankings. (various years) “Top Universities”, http://www.topuniversities.com. Accessed 3 May 2013
Robertson, S. L. (2010). The EU, ‘regulatory state regionalism’ and new modes of higher education governance. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 23–37.
Sadlak, J. (2006). Validity of university ranking and its ascending impact on higher education in Europe. Bridge, 12(December). Retrieved from www.ostina.org/content/view/1701/626
Sadlak, J. (2010). Quality challenge in a changing landscape of higher education: Place and impact of academic rankings. Evaluation in Higher Education, 4(1), 1–12.
Salmi, J., & Saroyan, A. (2007). League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 24–62.
Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.
Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. (various years). Academic Ranking of World Universities. http://www.arwu.org. Accessed 3 May 2013
Sharma, Y. (2010). Taiwan: way clear for Chinese students next year University World News. City.
Shin, J. C. (2011). Organizational effectiveness and university rankings. In: J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 19–34). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
Shin, J. C., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2011). The past, present, and future of University rankings. In: J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
Simon, D. F., & Kau, M. Y. M. (Eds.) (1992). Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Teichler, U. (2009). Between over-diversification and over-homogenization: Five decades of search for a creative fabric of higher education. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker (Eds.), University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 155–182). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Teichler, U. (2011). Social contexts and systemic consequence of university rankings: a meta-analysis of the ranking literature. In: J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 55–69). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
Tertiary Education Services Office of the Government of the Macao SAR. (2012). Staff and students data of higher education institutions of Macao. Macao: Tertiary Education Services Office of the Government of the Macao SAR.
Times Higher Education [THE]. (various years). World University Rankings. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings. Accessed 3 May 2013
Toutkoushian, R. K., & Webber, K. (2011). Measuring the research performance of postsecondary institutions. In: J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 123–144). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
University Grants Committee [UGC], Hong Kong. (2013). Statistics. http://cdcf.ugc.edu.hk/cdcf/statIndex.do?language=EN. Accessed 14 Sep 2013
Vaira, M. (2009). Towards unified and stratified systems of higher education? system convergence and organizational stratified. In B. M. Kehm & B. Stensaker, (Eds.), University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education (pp. 135–154). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
van Vught, F. A. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 151–174.
Watson, P. (2009). Regional themes and global means in supra-national higher education policy. Higher Education, 58(3), 419–438.
Yang, R. (2007). China’s soft power projection. International Higher Education, 46(Winter), 24–25.
Yang, R. (2010). Soft power and higher education: An examination of China’s Confucius Institutes. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(2), 235–245.
Zha, Q. (2009). Diversification or homogenization in higher education: A global allomorphism perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3-4), 459–479.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lo, W. (2014). Dimension 3: University Rankings and the Global Landscape of Higher Education: Using University Rankings to Promote Local Interests. In: University Rankings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-35-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-35-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-34-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-35-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)