Abstract
The development of connectedness between the school, community, and learners’ lives has occupied several educational reform efforts and progressive pedagogies at least since the early twentieth century (e.g., Dewey, 1998). It is, however, recently that the importance of connectedness has received a renewed interest accelerated by efforts to develop education that is adaptive to supporting every learner for life and work in the twenty-first century. The idea of connectedness or ‘connected learning’ implies the dynamic relationship that exists between home, school, and community, and between the curriculum and students’ learning lives situated within and across formal, semi-formal, and informal contexts (Erstad et al., 2009; Kumpulainen et al., 2011). In this paper, I shall elaborate on ongoing research and development efforts to promote connected learning in the Finnish education system. In specific, I shall discuss our emerging understanding of potential pedagogies of connected learning, namely dialogic pedagogy, and how it is socially constructed into being in situated interactions of classroom communities whose learning spaces have been extended to semi-formal and informal settings of learning. The paper makes visible the sociocultural practices of connected learning, and considers what possibilities for learner agency and engagement are created.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching. Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge, UK: Dialogos.
Andersen, P. L., & Hansen, M. N. (2011). Class and cultural capital – The case of class inequality in educational performance. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 1–15.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Alex.
Bowers, J., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999). The evolution of mathematical practices: A case study. Cognition and Instruction, 17(1), 25–64.
Bransford, J., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., et al. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 209–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.
Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413.
Brown, R., & Renshaw, P. (2000). Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 52–66). Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
Brown, R., & Renshaw, P. (2006). Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(3), 247–259.
Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353–400.
César, M. (2007). Dialogical identities in students from cultural minorities or students categorised as presenting SEN: How do they shape learning, namely in mathematics? In ScTIG Group (Eds.), 2nd socio-cultural theory in educational research & practice conference proceedings. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. Retrieved from www.lta.education.manchester.ac.uk/ScTIG/index.htm
Cole, M. (1996). Culture in mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8–11 (2nd ed.). Birmingham, UK: Imaginative Minds.
Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education: The 60th anniversary. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.
Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.
Edwards, A., & D’Arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56(2), 147–155.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Erstad, O., Gilje, O., Sefton-Green, J., & Vasbo, K. (2009). Exploring ‘learning lives’: Community, identity, literacy and meaning. Literacy, 43(2), 100–106.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2011). The school of opportunities – Towards every learner’s full potential. Helsinki, Finland: Kopiojyvä Oy.
Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1–32.
Gonzáles, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. D. (1999). Establishing a community of practice in a secondary mathematics classroom. In L. Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics from hierarchies to networks. London: Falmer Press.
Greeno, J. G. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537–547.
Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Communities of learning in the classroom. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 177–225). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hubbard, L. A., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.
Kantor, R., Green, J., Bradley, M., & Lin, L. (1992). The construction of schooled discourse repertoires: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on learning to talk in preschool. Linguistics and Education, 4, 131–172.
Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2005). The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instructional Science, 33(3), 213–250.
Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 141–158.
Kovalainen, M., Kumpulainen, K., & Vasama, S. (2001). Orchestrating classroom interaction in a community of inquiry. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 17–28.
Kumpulainen, K., Krokfors, L., Lipponen, L., Tissari, V., Hilppö, J., & Rajala, A. (2011). Learning bridges – Toward participatory learning environments. Helsinki, Finland: CICERO Learning, University of Helsinki.
Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2010). Productive interaction as agentic participation in dialogic enquiry. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues. Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 48–63). London: Routledge.
Kumpulainen, K., & Renshaw, P. (2007). Cultures of learning. An introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 109–115.
Kumpulainen, K., Vasama, S., & Kangassalo, M. (2003). The intertextuality of children’s explanations in a technology-enriched early years science classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 793–805.
Kumpulainen, K., & Wray, D. (Eds.). (2002). Classroom interaction and social learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. (2004). Learning across multiple places and their chronotope. Retrieved April 27, 2010, from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/aera_2004.htm
Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–819.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 431–466.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rajala, A., Hilppö, J., Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2013). Expanding the chronotopes of schooling for promotion of students’ agency. In J. Shefton-Green & O. Erstad (Eds.), Learning lives (pp. 107–125). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Renshaw, P., & Brown, R. (1997). Learning partnerships: The role of teachers in a community of learners. In I. Logan & J. Sachs (Eds.), Meeting the challenges of primary schools (pp. 200–211). London: Routledge.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.
Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills. Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
van der Linden, J., & Renshaw, P. (Eds.). (2004). Dialogic learning. Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction and teaching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Walker, D., & Nocon, H. (2007). Boundary-crossing competence: Theoretical considerations and educational design. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(3), 178–195.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity (learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumpulainen, K. (2014). Pedagogies of Connected Learning: Adapting Education into the Twenty-First Century. In: Hung, D., Lim, K., Lee, SS. (eds) Adaptivity as a Transformative Disposition. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-17-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-17-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-16-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-17-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)