Abstract
How useful are the experiences of the HPES? There are differing perspectives of how the use of PISA results can inform policy and in turn, be translated into practice. While there are many who advocate the importance of learning from HPES, there are contesting voices to caution against negative implications that may arise, citing examples of how policymakers or educators may misinterpret finding and implement policies that may backfire or be counterproductive if they are unable to anticipate and prepare for change. The relationship between Education and Economics; and between Quality and Equity in Education emerge as two major themes resulting from a close meta-analysis of the data provided by OECD. The meta-analysis reveals a startling finding hitherto unknown, i.e. The quality does, in fact, lead to equity and this points the way forward for policymakers that in the quest for equity, building quality is the first step that one can and should take.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asia Society. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Retrieved from http://asiasociety.org/education/learning-world/equity-and-quality-education
Astin, A. (1985). Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper & Row.
Cummings, W. K., & Altbach, P. G. (Eds.). (1997). The challenge of Eastern Asian education: Implications for America. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Duke, B. (1985). The Japanese schools: Lessons for industrial America. New York: Praeger.
Evetts, J. (1973). The sociology of educational ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ho, E. S. C. (2013). Overall quality and equality of Hong Kong basic education system from PISA 2000+ to PISA 2006. In E. S. C. Ho (Ed.), Multilevel analysis of the PISA data: Insights for policy and practice (pp. 17–36). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Jensen, B. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best schools systems in East Asia. Melbourne, Australia: The Grattan Institute.
Khadaroo, S. T. (2013, April 26). ‘A nation at risk’: How much of ‘apocalyptic’ education report still applies? The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2013/0426/A-Nation-at-Risk-How-much-of-apocalyptic-education-report-still-applies
Lee, W. O. (1991). The search for excellence and relevance in education: Lessons from Japan’s fourth educational reform proposals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 17–32.
Lee, W. O., & Lee, S. K. (2011). Learning from success. International Alliance of Leading Education Institutes Newsletter, 2, 1–4.
Lynn, R. (1988). Educational achievement in Japan: Lessons for the West. Hampshire, UK: Macmillan.
National Commission of the States Task Force on Education for Growth. (1983). Action for excellence. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Science Board Commission on Pre-college Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. (1983). Educating Americans for the 2lst century: A Report to the American people and the National Science Board. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background – Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. 2). Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264091504-en.
OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264096660-en.
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264177338-en.
Robbins, L. (2007). Equity v. excellence: Is education still a zero-sum game? Peabody Reflector. Retrieved from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/equity_vs_excellence.xml
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2009). Initial findings from the IEA international civic and citizenship study. Amsterdam: IEA.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Touchstone.
Stewart, V. (2012). A world-class education: Learning from international models of excellence and innovation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tucker, M. S. (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2013). Human development report 2013. The rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. New York: Author.
Vogel, E. F. (1979). Japan as number one: Lessons for America. New York: Harper & Row.
World Bank. (2013). World development indicators. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.as
Acknowledgements
The authors will like to thank Ms Jocelyn Shi Yah Tan for her assistance in the drafting process, and for gathering data for this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, W.O., Low, E.L., Lee, S.K. (2014). How Useful Are the Experiences of the High Performing Education Systems?. In: Lee, S., Lee, W., Low, E. (eds) Educational Policy Innovations. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-08-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-08-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-07-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-08-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)