Advertisement

Teaching Practices at CHC Education Institutions: A Hidden Challenge and Techniques to Enhance Cooperative Learning

  • Pham Thi Hong Thanh
Chapter
  • 1k Downloads
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 25)

Abstract

This chapter aims to discuss teaching practices at CHC education institutions and points out how the traditional teaching teacher-centredness hinders cooperative learning. Relevant literature and findings of empirical studies documented in this chapter disclose that CHC teachers’ resistance to empowering students in active learning is the main barrier preventing CHC students from adopting cooperative learning. To better this situation, there is a need to develop strategies that could enable CHC teachers to delegate part of their authority to students. The chapter then reports an empirical study that was conducted to develop such strategies. The results revealed that when teachers were mandatorily required to implement the reform, they tended to only implement ‘artificial’ changes (i.e. modify some teaching activities in class, redesign the lesson plan) that did not empower students to engage in real cooperative learning. Students were only given a chance to practise proper cooperative learning activities when teachers were convinced about the effectiveness of the reform and particularly when assisted to change their belief. The study highlighted that CHC teachers’ voices need to be taken into careful consideration. Then, culturally appropriate strategies that could assist CHC teachers to make real change need to be developed.

Keywords

Learning Activity Verbal Behaviour Cooperative Learning Previous Lesson Bright Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, B. B., Daffinrud, S. M., Lewis, H. A., & Millar, S. B. (1995). Executive summary: Final evaluation of report: Math 130, Arithmetical problem solving, learning through evaluation, adaptation and dissemination (LEAD) of education reform. http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/-lead/. Accessed 11 Feb 2006.
  2. Antil, R. L., Jenkins, R. J., Wayne, K. S., & Vadasy, F. P. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris, C. (1976). Increasing leadership effectiveness. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Ban, T., & Cummings, W. K. (1999). Moral orientations of school children in the United States and Japan. Comparative Education Review, 43, 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Biggs, J., & Watkins, D. (1996). The Chinese learner in retrospect. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 269–285). Hong Kong: CERC and ACER.Google Scholar
  8. Black, S. (1992). Group learning. Executive Educator, 14(9), 18–20.Google Scholar
  9. Bramlett, R. K. (1992). Cooperative learning: A field study with implications for school psychologists (Report No. CGO-24657). Paper presented at the 1992 annual convention of the American psychological association (ERIC document reproduction service No. ED 351654).Google Scholar
  10. Brick, J. (1991). China: A handbook in intercultural communication. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, J. (1990). Teachers and students: Constructivists forging connections. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 68–71.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Promoting learning and understanding through constructivist approaches for Chinese learners. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Bigs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychology and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 181–203). Hong Kong: CERC, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  15. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, E., & Intili, J. A. (1982). Interdependence and management in bilingual classrooms. Final report. Stanford University California, Centre for Educational Research at Stanford.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, E., Lotan, R., Abram, P., Scarloss, B., & Schultz, S. (2002). Can groups learn? Teachers College Record, 104, 1045–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Confucius. (1947). The wisdom of Confucius. In S. Commins & R. N. Linscott (Eds.), Man and man: The social philosophers (pp. 323–258). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. DeVillar, R. A., & Faltis, C. J. (1991). Computers and cultural diversity: Restructuring for school success. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Di Vesta, F., & Smith, D. (1979). The pausing principle: Increasing the efficiency of memory for ongoing events. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4(3), 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dirksen, C. (1990). Learning styles of mainland Chinese students of English. IDEAL (Issues and Development in English and Applied Linguistics), 5, 29–38.Google Scholar
  25. Dole, J., & Sinatra, G. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.Google Scholar
  26. Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  27. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D., & Pell, T. (1999). Changes in patterns of teacher interaction in primary classrooms: 1976–96. British Journal of Educational Research, 25, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gay, L. R., Mills, E. G., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Gillies, R. (2004a). The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gillies, R. (2004b). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gillies, R. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gillies, R. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Gillies, R. M., & Haynes, M. (2011). Increasing explanatory behaviour, problem-solving, and reasoning within classes using cooperative group work. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 39(3), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gillies, R. M., & Khan, A. (2008). The effects of teacher discourse on students’ discourse, problem-solving, and reasoning during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning? Higher Education, 19, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Education Psychology, 63, 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harmon, R. (2000). Competing in an international era: preparing the workforce for the global economy. In depth. Workforce Economics, 6(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  39. Ho, S.-P. A. (1998). Changing teachers’ conceptions of teaching as an approach to enhancing teaching and learning in tertiary education. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  40. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, J. (2005). Cultures and organization-software of the minds (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  41. Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concepts of “face”. American Anthropologist, 46(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hu, C. T. (1960). China: Its people, its society, its culture. New Haven: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jin, L. X., & Cortazzi, M. (1995). A cultural synergy model for academic language use. In P. Bruthiaux, T. Boswood, & B. Du-Babcock (Eds.), Explorations in English for professional communication (pp. 41–56). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  45. Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 739–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29–33.Google Scholar
  47. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992). Approaches to implementing cooperative learning in the social studies classroom. In R. J. Stahl & R. L. VanSickle (Eds.), Cooperative learning in the social studies classroom: An invitation to social study (pp. 44–51). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone. London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  49. Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2001). What is cooperative learning? The Cooperative learning centre at the University of Minnesota. http://www.clcrc.com. Accessed 26 Nov 2001.
  50. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: Myth-understandings about adult Hong Kong-Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(5), 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK – TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher-level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). On the appropriateness of language teaching methods in language and development. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language and Development. http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/hanoi_proceedings/contents.htm. Accessed 12 Jan 2010.
  54. Ledlow, S. (1999). Cooperative learning in higher education. http://clte.asu.edu/active/clinhighed.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
  55. Lee, C. K., Ng, M., & Phang, R. (1999). A school-based study of cooperative learning and its effects on social studies achievement. Attitudes toward the subject and classroom climate in four social studies classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, 19–23 April.Google Scholar
  56. Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lopata, C., Miller, K., & Miller, R. (2003). Survey of actual and preferred use of cooperative learning among exemplar teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (2007). Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McSwinney, J. (1995). Business process re-engineering for small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. In Proceedings of IFIP conference on re-engineering the enterprise, Galway.Google Scholar
  60. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Research, 25, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Michaelsen, L. (1998). A workshop on using small groups effectively. AAA Annual meeting. New Orleans: Continuing professional Education.Google Scholar
  62. Morris, P. (1985). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to the implementation of a pedagogic innovation: A South East Asian case study. International Review of Education, 31, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nguyen, K. D. (2005). Investigations on teaching innovation at Ho Chi Minh teacher’s College. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
  65. Niles, F. S. (1995). Cultural differences in learning motivation and earning strategies: A comparison of overseas and Australian students at an Australian university. International Journal Intercultural Relations, 19(3), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. (1988). Teaching and practicing thinking skills to promote comprehension in the context of group problem solving. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 53–59.Google Scholar
  68. Palinscar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice, 41, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29(2), 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Phuong-Mai, N. (2008). Culture and cooperation cooperative learning in Asian confucian heritage cultures: The case of Viet Nam. Netherlands: IVLOS Institute of Education of Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  71. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  72. Pratt, D. D. (1992). Chinese conceptions of learning and teaching: A westerner’s attempt at understanding. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 11(4), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Raths, J. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching beliefs. Early Childhood Research & Practice (ECRP), 3(1), 385–391. http//ecrp.uiuc.edu/v3n1/raths.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2012.Google Scholar
  75. Renshaw, P. (1992). Synthesising the individual and the social: Sociocultural theory applied to the mathematics education of young children. Paper presented at the 7th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Quebec City, Aug 1992.Google Scholar
  76. Rich, Y. (1990). Ideological impediments to instructional innovation: The case of cooperative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(1), 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Richards, C. (1998). Beyond training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Ruby, R., & Ladd, P. (1999). Learning styles and adjustment issues of international students. Journal of Education for Business, 7(6), 363–379.Google Scholar
  79. Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  81. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Sharan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning and the teacher. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  83. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sparks, G. M. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 41, 65–72.Google Scholar
  85. Tan, G., Gallo, P. B., Jacobs, G. M., & Lee, C. K.-E. (1999). Using cooperative learning to integrate thinking and information technology in a content-based writing lesson. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(8), 13–21.Google Scholar
  86. Tang, T. K. W. (1993). Do teachers’ belief influence student learning. In J. B. Biggs & A. D. Watkins (Eds.), Learning and teaching in Hong Kong: What is and what might be (pp. 53–66). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  87. Tang, T. K. W. (2001). The influence of teacher education on conceptions of teaching and learning. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 219–236). Hong Kong/Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  88. Thanh-Pham, T. H. (2011a). Effects of assessment on cooperation among Vietnamese college students. Higher Education Review, 43(2), 42–55.Google Scholar
  89. Thanh-Pham, T. H. (2011b). An investigation of perceptions of Vietnamese teachers and students toward cooperative learning. International Education Studies, 4(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
  90. Thanh-Pham, T. H. (2013). Using group projects as a strategy to increase cooperation among low and high achieving students. Higher Education Research and Development. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.806436.Google Scholar
  91. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Turner, J., Meyer, D., Midgley, C., & Patrick, H. (2003). Teachers’ discourse and sixth graders reported affect and achievement behaviours in two high-mastery/high-performance mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Turner, J., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 9, 1759–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychology and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: CERC, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  96. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9, 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  98. Wong, N. Y. (2003). Kaoshi: Huarandiquhuizhibuqu de mengyan. Hong Kong Economic Journal, 27 MarchGoogle Scholar
  99. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Woodrow, D. (2007). The impact of culture in creating differential learning styles. In G. K. Verma, C. Bagley, & M. Jha (Eds.), International perspectives on educational diversity and inclusion (pp. 87–104). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pham Thi Hong Thanh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations