Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Biofuel Production from Oil Palm Biomass

  • Keat Teong LeeEmail author
  • Cynthia Ofori-Boateng
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


With the aim of minimizing the dependency on fossil fuels whilst improving the economic viability and environmental performances of oil palm production for biofuels production, emission control from these systems become invincible. However, with best management practices couples with stringent adherence to basic environmental sustainability principles, these hurdles may be surmounted. The environmental sustainability dimension of impact assessment for this chapter is based on life cycle assessment for common palm biofuels like biodiesel, bioethanol, bio-methanol via BtL route, biogas and bio-electricity from oil palm biomass. Possible improvement options are also outlined in this chapter to ensure more positive energy balance and almost zero emissions from each of the biofuels production systems considered.


Life cycle assessment Greenhouse gas emissions Palm biofuels Bioelectricity Environmental sustainability Climate change Energy balance 


  1. Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace B, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J (2002) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL Technical Report, NREL/TP-510-32438Google Scholar
  2. Barrañon DCC (2006) Methanol and hydrogen production. Dissertation, Lulea University Technology, LuleaGoogle Scholar
  3. Boerriegter HV (2004) BIOSYNGAS description of R&D trajectory necessary to reach large-scale implementation of renewable syngas from biomass. ECN-C-04-112Google Scholar
  4. Buchholz T, Volk TA, Luzadis VA (2007) A participatory systems approach to modeling social, economic, and ecological components of bioenergy. Energ Policy 35:6084–6094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choo YM, Muhamad H, Hashim Z, Subramaniam V, Puah CW, Tan Y (2011) Determination of GHG contributions by subsystems in the oil palm supply chain using the LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choosak K, Chanporn T, Pornpote P (2009) LCA studies comparing biodiesel synthesized by conventional and supercritical methanol methods. J Clean Prod 17:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choudhary S (2012) Comparative lifecycle analysis of bioenergy pathways: cellulosic ethanol vs biomass electricity. Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) thesis, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  8. Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2003) The oil palm, 4th edn. Blackwell, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly HE (1990) Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 2:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donato LB, Huerga IR, Hilbert JA (2005) Energy balance of soybean-based biodiesel production in Argentina. Institute of Rural Engineering, The National Agricultural Technology Institute (INTA), ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  11. Economic Planning Unit (2006) Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006–2010. Economic Planning Unit, PutrajayaGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards AC, Scalenghe R, Freppaz M (2007) Changes in the seasonal snow cover of alpine regions and its effects on soil processes: a review. Quatern Int 162–163:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairhurst T, McLaughlin D (2009) Sustainable oil palm development on degraded land in kalimantan. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng H, Rubin OD, Babcock BA (2008) greenhouse gas impacts of ethanol from iowa corn: life cycle analysis versus system-wide accounting. Working Paper 08-WP 461, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1070.
  15. Goh CS, Lee KT, Bhatia S (2010) Hot compressed water pretreatment of oil palm fronds to enhance glucose recovery for production of second generation bio-ethanol. Bioresour Technol 101:7362–7367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. González-García S, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Comparative environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol from different feedstocks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:2077–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamelinck CN, Faaij AC (2002) Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Source 1:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassan S, Nor FM, Zainal ZA, Miskam MA (2011) Performance and emissions characteristics of supercharged biomass producer gas-diesel dual fuel engine. J Appl Sci 10:3923Google Scholar
  19. Heijungs R, Huppes G, Guinee JB (2010) Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis. Polym Degrad Stabil 95:422–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henson IE (2005) An assessment of changes in biomass carbon stocks in tree crops and forests in Malaysia. J Trop Sci 17:279–296Google Scholar
  21. Hong LS, Ibrahim D, Omar IC (2012) Oil palm frond for the production of bioethanol. Int J Biochem Biotechnol 1:7–11Google Scholar
  22. Huber GW, Lborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts and engineering. Chem Rev 106:4044–4098Google Scholar
  23. Husain Z, Zainal ZA, Abdullah MZ (2003) Analysis of biomass-residue-based cogeneration system in the palm oil mills. Biomass Bioenergy 24:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ILCD (2010) ILCD handbook-specific guide for life cycle inventory datasets, 1st edn. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Programme, IGES, JapanGoogle Scholar
  26. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and frame work, ISO 14040. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  27. Jung YH, Kim S, Yang TH, Lee HJ, Seung D, Park YC, Seo JH, Choi IG, Kim KH (2012) Aqueous ammonia pretreatment, saccharification, and fermentation evaluation of oil palm fronds for ethanol production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:1497–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim S, Dale BE (2008) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol derived from corn grain via dry milling. Bioresour Technol 99:5250–5260Google Scholar
  29. Levelton Engineering Ltd. (2000) Assessment of net emissions of greenhouse gases from ethanol-gasoline blends in southern Ontario. Cross-Sectoral Policy Development Division Industry Performance and Analysis Directorate Policy Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada. Available at
  30. Lin B-F, Huang J-H, Huang D-Y (2008) Effects of biodiesel from palm kernel oil on the engine performance, exhaust emissions and combustion characteristics of a direct injection diesel engine. Energy Fuel 22:4229–4234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luo L, Van Der Voet E, Huppes G (2009) Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:1613–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MPOB (Malaysia Palm Oil Board) (2010) Malaysian oil palm industry statistics 2009, 29th edn. Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakagawa H, Harada T (2004) Biomethanol production from lignocellulosic resources in the tropical and subtropical Asia, In: Lignocellulose: materials for the future from the tropics. JIRCAS Working Report No. 39, JIRCAS, Tsukuba, Japan, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  34. Novizar N, Dwi S (2010) Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from palm oil and jatropha oil in indonesia. In: Biomass Asia Workshop, Jakarta, November 29–December 01Google Scholar
  35. Ofori-Boateng C, Kwofie EM (2009) Water scrubbing: a better option for biogas purification for effective storage. World Appl Sci 5:122–125Google Scholar
  36. Olivério JL, Ribeiro JE (2006) Cogeneration in Brazilian sugar and bioethanol mills: past, present and challenges. Int Sugar 108:391–401Google Scholar
  37. O-Thong S, Boe K, Angelidaki I (2012) Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas production. Appl Energ 93:648–654Google Scholar
  38. Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Rydberg T, Rebitzer G (2004) Life cycle assessment. Part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environ Int 30:721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pierik J (1995) Logistics and pretreatment of biomass fuels for gasification and combustion. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, PattenGoogle Scholar
  40. Pimentel D, Patzek TW (2005) Ethanol production using corn, switch grass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Nat Resour Res 14:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt WP, Suh S, Weidemai BP, Pennington DW (2004) Life cycle assessment. Part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Renó MLG, Lora EES, Palacio JCE, Venturini OJ, Buchgeister J, Almazan O (2011) A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Energy 36:3716–3726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32Google Scholar
  44. Santy S (2010) Sourcing lifecycle for software as a service (SAAS) implementation shell case. Master thesis, University of Twente, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switch grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt JH (2007) Life assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Ph.D. thesis, Part 3: Lifecycle inventory of rapeseed oil and palm oil, Diss. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  47. Shirai Y, Minatowakisaka Yacob S, Hassan MA, Suzuki SI (2003) Reduction of methane released from palm oil mill lagoon in Malaysia and its counter-measures. Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change 8:237–252Google Scholar
  48. Spatari S, Zhang Y, Maclean H (2005) Life cycle assessment of switch grass and corn stover-derived ethanol-fueled automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 39:9750–9758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spatari S, Bagley DM, MacLean HL (2010) Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol 101:654–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stephenson AL, von Blottnitz H, Brent AC, Dennis JS, Scott SA (2010) Global warming potential and fossil-energy requirements of biodiesel production scenarios in South Africa. Energy Fuel 24:24–89Google Scholar
  51. Subramaniam V, Chow MC, Ma AN (2004) Energy database of the oil palm. Palm oil engineering bulletin, vol. EB70. Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB), KajangGoogle Scholar
  52. Subramaniam V, Ma AN, Choo YM, Nik MNS (2008) Environmental performance of the milling process of Malaysian palm oil using the life cycle assessment approach. Am J Environ Sci 4:310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suh S, Huppes G (2005) Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J Clean Prod 13:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment, background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe. Part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vanichseni T, Intaravichai S, Saitthiti B, Kiatiwat T (2002) Potential biodiesel production from palm oil for Thailand. Kasetsart J: Nat Sci 36:83–97Google Scholar
  56. Wang M, Wu M, Huo H (2007) Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environ Res Lett 2:024001Google Scholar
  57. Wang W, Tseng MM (2009) Life Cycle Commonality: As a Systematic Approach to Achieve Product Design for Sustainability. The 6th CIRP Sponsored International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, Hong Kong, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang MQ, Han J, Haq Z, Tyner WE, Wu M, Eligawainy A (2011) Energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of corn and cellulosic ethanol with technology improvement and land use changes. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1885–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wicke B, Dornburg V, Junginger M, Faaij A (2008) Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1322–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Womeni HM, Tiencheu B, Tenyang N, Tchouanguep MF, Kpaseu C, Linder M, Fanni J (2010) Extraction of palm kernel oil in Cameroon: effects of kernels drying on the oil quality. J Food Technol 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M (2006) Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switch grass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Progress 22:1012–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yee KF, Tan KT, Abdullah AZ, Lee KT (2009) Life cycle assessment of palm biodiesel: revealing facts and benefits for sustainability. Appl Energ 86:S189–S196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yu S, Toa Jing (2009) Energy efficiency assessment by life cycle simulation of cassava-based fuel ethanol for automotive use in Chinese Guangxi context. Energy 34:22–31Google Scholar
  64. Yusoff S, Hansen SB (2007) Feasibility study of performing a life cycle assessment on crude palm oil production in Malaysia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zulkifli H, Halimah M, Chan KW, Choo YM, Mohd Basri W (2010) Life cycle assessment for oil palm fresh fruit bunch production from continued land use for oil palm planted on mineral soil (Part 2). J Oil Palm Res 22:887–894Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaSPS PenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations