Advertisement

High Stakes Testing, Literacy Wars, Globalisation and Asia

  • Marilyn Kell
  • Peter Kell
Chapter
  • 526 Downloads
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 24)

Abstract

This chapter describes the background and context for what has been termed “high stakes testing” and the growth of international student achievement tests in literacy and numeracy. Testing has been popularised through a perception that testing is a scientific and unbiased form of monitoring the performance of students and schooling systems. There is a growing reliance on the use of testing to evaluate the performance of students, teachers and school systems but the chapter identifies problems and issues as well. This includes problems from teachers “teaching to the test”, the narrowing of curriculum options and a reliance on passive forms of learning based on rote learning, memorisation and recall to pass tests. The chapter also argues that testing can reinforce inequality and that testing methodologies promote sorting and gating processes that reduce options and opportunities for many students. The chapter also describes the context in which East Asian countries, such as Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan and more recently China have exhibited high levels of achievement in international student achievement tests.

Keywords

National Curriculum High Stake High Stake Testing High Ranking School Improve Minority Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Backes-Gellner, U., & Veen, S. (2008). The consequences of central examinations on educational quality standards and labour market outcomes. Oxford Review of Education, 34(5), 569–588. doi: 10.1080/03054980701877617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birk, L. (2003). Collateral damage: Social-justice curricula are jeopardized in high-stakes environment. In Harvard Education Letter (Eds.), Spotlight on high-stakes testing (pp. 75–81). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dall, A. (2010, November 28–December 2). PISA – Soft governing with hard-core impact? Paper presented at Making a Difference, AARE International Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from www.aare.edu.au/10pap/2300Dall.pdf
  4. Lingard, B., & Grek, S. (2007). The OECD, indicators and PISA: An exploration of events and theoretical perspectives. ESRC/ESF Research Project on Fabricating Quality in Education (Working Paper 2). Retrieved from http://www.ces.ed.ac.uk/research/FabQ/publications.htm
  5. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reforms: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Nardi, E. (2008). Cultural biases: A non-Anglophone perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 259–266. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695940802417467.
  7. Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Popham, W. J. (2003). Preparing for the coming avalanche of accountability tests. In Harvard Education Letter (Ed.), Spotlight on high-stakes testing (pp. 9–15). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  9. Sadowski, M. (2003). Are high-stakes tests worth the wager? In Harvard Education Letter (Ed.), Spotlight on high-stakes testing (pp. 47–59). Cambridge, MA: Education Press.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, J. M., & Kovacs, P. E. (2011). The impact of standards-based reform on teachers: The case of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Teachers and Teaching, 17(2), 201–225. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2011.539802.
  11. Valli, L., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Buese, D. (2008). Test driven high-stakes accountability ion elementary schools. London: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Wagner, T. (2003). Making the grade: Reinventing America’s schools. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn Kell
    • 1
  • Peter Kell
    • 2
  1. 1.Charles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  2. 2.School of EducationCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia

Personalised recommendations