Abstract
This study examines the effects of different types of shadow education on academic achievement, using data from a longitudinal survey of a nationally representative sample of South Korean seventh graders. To control for pre-existing differences between students who used a particular type of shadow education and those who did not, the study employed a series of statistical models including propensity score matching techniques. Results show that the use of a particular type of shadow education (i.e., preparatory cram school) made a small difference in achievement gains in math, whereas other forms (i.e., individual tutoring, correspondence courses, on-line tutoring services, and Educational Broadcasting System [EBS]) made little difference. Limitations, implications, and future research directions are discussed.
Earlier versions of this manuscript were presented at the workshop for The Contours of Korean Education: Educational Challenges of Recent Economic and Demographic Changes, August 3, 2009, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and at the fifth conference of the Korean Education Longitudinal Survey, October 20, 2011, Seoul, Republic of Korea. The author thanks Jere R. Behrman, Robin Sakamoto, and Hee-sam Kim for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. The author also thanks Adrienne Henck for her editorial suggestions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For shadow education, I drew on the first and second follow-up parent surveys because the ways which parents were asked about shadow education were somewhat different between the base-year and the two follow-up surveys.
- 2.
I also examined the effects of shadow education by including all types of shadow education simultaneously and found similar results reported in this study.
- 3.
I also examined the interaction of parental education, family income, and previous achievement with each type of shadow education but found no significant interaction effects. The results from interaction effects are available upon request from the author.
- 4.
I replicated propensity score analyses with different caliper sizes and found few differences among/between/in the findings reported in this study. The results from propensity score analyses with different caliper sizes are available upon request from the author.
References
Aurini, J., & Davies, S. (2004). The transformation of private tutoring: Education in a franchise form. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(3), 419–438.
Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ban, S., Jeong, C., & Yang, S. (2005). Analysis of the effects of private tutoring on student achievement. Paper presented at the first conference of the Korean Education and Employment Panel, Seoul [In Korean].
Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: Conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22, 611–620.
Buchmann, C. (2002). Getting ahead in Kenya: Social capital, shadow education and achievement. Research in Sociology of Education, 13, 133–159.
Buchmann, C., Condron, D., & Roscigno, V. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT, and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.
Byun, S. (2010). Does policy matter in shadow education spending? Revisiting the effects of the High School Equalization Policy in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 83–96.
Byun, S., & Park, H. (2012). The academic success of East Asian American youth: The role of shadow education. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 40–60.
Cheo, R., & Quah, E. (2005). Mothers, maids and tutors: An empirical evaluation of their effect on children’s academic grades in Singapore. Education Economics, 13(3), 269–285.
Dang, H. (2007). The determinants and impact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam. Economics of Education Review, 26, 684–699.
Dang, H., & Rogers, F. H. (2008). The growing phenomenon of private tutoring: Does it deepen human capital, widen inequalities, or waste resources? World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 161–200.
Domingue, B., & Briggs, D. C. (2009). Using linear regression and propensity score matching to estimate the effect of coaching on the SAT. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 35(1), 12–29.
Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2009). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kang, C. (2009). An international comparison of the effect of private education spending on student academic performance: Evidence from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2006. Korean Journal of Labor Economics, 32(3), 61–89.
Kang, C., & Lee, S. (2010). An economic analysis of private tutoring in Korea. Seoul: Korean Education Development Institute [In Korean].
Kang, S., Cha, I., Jeong, J., & Park, S. (2008). The effects of youth’s learning environments on academic achievement: Focusing on private tutoring and family background. Paper presented at the Korean Youth Panel Survey conference, Seoul [In Korean].
Kim, M. (2005). Estimation of the education production function: Regression analysis of academic achievement. Paper presented at the first conference of the Korean Education and Employment Panel, Seoul [In Korean].
Kim, K. (2007). Shadow education: Analysis of its effects. Paper presented at the 4th conference of the Korean Youth Panel Survey, Seoul [In Korean].
Kim, M., Kang, Y., Park, S., Hwang, Y., & Lee, H. (2006). Scales of the entrance examination industry and its development: A study of the entrance examination industry and college admission policy. Seoul: Korean Education Development Institute [In Korean].
Korea National Statistical Office. (2011). The survey of private education expenditures in 2010. Seoul: Korea National Statistical Office.
Kuan, P. (2011). Effects of cram schooling on mathematics performance: Evidence from junior high students in Taiwan. Comparative Education Review, 55(3), 342–368.
Lee, C., Lee, H., & Jang, H. (2010). The history of policy responses to shadow education in South Korea: Implications for the next cycle of policy responses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 97–108.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Chestnut: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Park, H., Sang, K., & Kang, J. (2008). Effect of private tutoring on middle school students’ achievement. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(4), 107–127 [In Korean].
Park, H., Byun, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Parental involvement and students: Focusing on private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 82(1), 3–22.
Rogers, W. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516–524.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33–38.
Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.
Sung, K., & Kim, J. (2010). A comparative study on the relationship between private tutoring experiences and high school students’ academic science achievement: Korea, Finland, and Japan. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(1), 103–126 [In Korean].
Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2005). Effect of private tutoring on university entrance examination performance in Turkey (IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 1609). http://ftp.iza.org/dp1609.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2013.
Zhou, M., & Kim, S. S. (2006). Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byun, Sy. (2014). Shadow Education and Academic Success in Republic of Korea. In: Park, H., Kim, Kk. (eds) Korean Education in Changing Economic and Demographic Contexts. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 23. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-27-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-27-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-26-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-27-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)