Skip to main content

How to Determine the Relief Target for Minamata Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecological Risk Management

Part of the book series: Ecological Research Monographs ((ECOLOGICAL))

  • 497 Accesses

Abstract

Minamata disease that occurred in southern Kyushu and Niigata prefecture in Japan was caused by ingesting seafood that is contaminated by methylmercury discharged from factories. This is a world-renowned pollution disease. Minamata disease is judged from the symptoms peculiar to mercury poisoning. However, it is known that mercury poisoning causes other disorders even at low concentrations of exposure, especially in fetal exposure. Those who are not certified as Minamata disease patients is widely rescued if they have eaten seafood in the area and have some kind of disability. In this chapter, we will discuss the concept of the precautionary principle and its scope of application through the case of Minamata disease. The key concepts are benchmark dose (BMD) and its lower limit (BMDL). When a person’s symptoms occur at a certain frequency, say 5%, without mercury intake, with a higher probability of a certain exposure of mercury intake, say 10%, this exposure level is called BMD. BMD is used for tolerable intake. The relationship between this exposure and the incidence of symptoms is estimated by a dose–response relationship, but the estimation includes uncertainty. Based on the precautionary principle, the fifth percentile of BMD is calculated. This is called BMDL. It is used as a recommendation based on the precautionary principle as a guide to refrain from mercury intake. In Japan, this is used as the standard for people who are eligible for relief from Minamata disease. In that case, 5% of people who are not actually exposed to mercury will be eligible for relief, and there will be less than 10% of true relief recipients due to mercury exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Budtz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P, Keiding N, White RF, Weihe P (2000) Benchmark dose calculations of methylmercury-associated neurobehavioural deficits. Toxicol Lett 112-113:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump KS, Kjellstrom T, Shipp AM, Silvers A, Stewart A (1998) Influence of prenatal mercury exposure upon scholastic and psychological test performance: benchmark analysis of a New Zealand cohort. Risk Anal 18:701–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump KS, Van Landingham C, Shamlaye C et al (2000) Benchmark concentrations for methylmercury obtained from the Seychelles child development study. Environ Health Perspect 108(3):257–263. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108257

  • EFSA CONTAM Panel (2012) Scientific opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA J 10:2985. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2985

  • FSCJ [Food Safety Commission, Japan] (2005) Food safety risk assessment related to methylmercury in seafood. https://www.fsc.go.jp/english/index.data/methylmercury_risk_assessment.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2020

  • Futatsuka M, Ueda A, Yasutake R, Nomura S (1982) Estimation of dietary intake of methyl mercury in Minamata district. Kumamoto Med J 35:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada Y, Miyamoto Y, Nonaka I, Ohta S, Ninomiya T (1968) Electroencephalographic studies of Minamata disease in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 10:257–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harada M (1995) Minamata disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol 25:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda H (2003) Challenges posed by the precautionary principle and accountability in ecological risk assessment. Environmetrics 14:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa R, Yumita Y, Hiromoto M (1997) Total mercury intake from fish and shellfish by Japanese people. Chemosphere 35(12):2909–2913. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(97)00351-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi J, Masunaga S, Matsuda H (eds) (2003) Calculating environmental risks. Iwanami-Shoten, Tokyo, 246 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC [National Research Council] (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/9899

  • Takaoka S (2016) Minamata disease diagnosis general remarks. (in Japanese) https://www.kyouritsu-cl.com/up_file/1912/td04_file1_10142331.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2020

  • Tsurumi Y (2006) Minamata’s Moyainaoshi Movement and Sustainable Development: Recovery from Division, Chuo Univ. http://www.nier.go.jp/hidekim/ESD/Minamata.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2020

  • WHO, IPCS [World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety] (1990) Methylmercury/published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/38082. Accessed 4 Oct 2020

  • Yorifuji T, Tsuda T, Harada M (2013) Minamata disease: a challenge for democracy and justice. Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. European Environment Agency, Denmark, pp 124–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorifuji T, Tsuda T, Takao S, Suzuki E, Harada M (2009) Total mercury content in hair and neurologic signs - historic data from minamata. Epidemiol 20:188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Nakai S, Masunaga S (2009) An exposure assessment of methyl mercury via fish consumption for the Japanese population. Risk Anal 29:1281–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Dr. Zhang Ying, Dr. Makoto Futatsuka, Dr. Noriyuki Hachiya, Dr. Ikuo Hirata, Dr. Shigeki Masunaga, Dr. Junko Nakanishi, Dr. Shinya Ueno for valuable information. This chapter is partly supported by the Ministry of the Environment for the grant for “Comprehensive research on health effects of heavy metals.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matsuda, H., Ueno, S. (2021). How to Determine the Relief Target for Minamata Disease. In: Matsuda, H. (eds) Ecological Risk Management. Ecological Research Monographs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6934-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics